Quantifying flow-ecology relationships with functional linear models;Quantification des relations débit-écologie par des modèles linéaires fonctionnels

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 629-644

  Stewart Koster, Ben ^a,b   Olden, Julian D ^a   Gido, Keith B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

dams; ecohydrology; environmental flows; flow variation; functional data analysis; hydrologic metrics; river regulation

Indexed keywords

DAMS; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ECO-HYDROLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW; FLOW VARIATIONS; FUNCTIONAL DATA ANALYSIS; HYDROLOGIC METRICS; RIVER REGULATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS;

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOHYDROLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FLOW FIELD; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RIVER FLOW;

EID: 84901697403     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2013.860231     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abell, R. et al. 2008. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 58, 403-414. doi:10.1641/B580507
2. Ainsworth, L.M. Routledge, R. and Cao, J. 2011. Functional data analysis in ecosystem research: the decline of Oweekeno Lake sockeye salmon and Wannock River flow. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 16, 282-300. doi:10.1007/s13253-010-0049-z
3. Arthington, A.H. et al. 2006. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 16, 1311-1318. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2
4. Biggs, B.J.F. Nikora, V.I. and Snelder, T.H. 2005. Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function. River Research and Applications, 21, 283-298. doi:10.1002/rra.847
5. Bliesner, R. et al. 1999. Chapter 4: Physical and biological response to test flows. In: P.B. Holden, ed. Flow recommendations for the San Juan River, San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program. Albuquerque, NM: USFWS, 4-1-4-88.
6. Bliesner, R. et al. 2009. Hydrology, geomorphology, and habitat studies. 2008 annual report, San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program. Albuquerque, NM: USFWS.
7. Bradshaw, G.A. and Spies, T.A. 1992. Characterizing canopy gap structure in forests using wavelet analysis. The Journal of Ecology, 80, 205-215.
8. Brewer, S.K. 2013. Groundwater influences on the distribution and abundance of riverine smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu, in pasture landscapes of the midwestern USA. River Research and Applications, 29, 269-278.
9. Clausen, B. and Biggs, B.J.F. 2000. Flow variables for ecological studies in temperate streams: groupings based on covariance. Journal of Hydrology, 237, 184-197. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00306-1
10. Cooke, S.J. et al. 2005. Threats, conservation strategies, and prognosis for suckers (Catostomidae) in North America: insights from regional case studies of a diverse family of non-game fishes. Biological Conservation, 121, 317-331. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.015
11. Crainiceanu, C.M. and Goldsmith, A.J. 2010. Bayesian functional data analysis using WinBUGS. Journal of Statistical Software, 32, 1-33.
12. Farringer, R.T. Echelle, A.A. and Lehtinen, S.F. 1979. Reproductive cycle of the red shiner, Notropis lutrensis, in central Texas and South Central Oklahoma. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 108, 271-276. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1979)108<271:RCOTRS>2.0.CO;2
13. Franssen, N.R. Gido, K.B. and Propst, D.L. 2007. Flow regime affects availability of native and nonnative prey of an endangered predator. Biological Conservation, 138, 330-340. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.028
14. Gao, Y. et al. 2009. Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. Journal of Hydrology, 374, 136-147. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.009
15. Gido, K.B. and Propst, D.L. 1999. Habitat use and association of native and nonnative fishes in the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah. Copeia, 1999, 321-333. doi:10.2307/1447478
16. Gido, K.B. and Propst, D.L. 2012. Long-term dynamics of native and nonnative fishes in the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah, under a partially managed flow regime. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 141, 645-659. doi:10.1080/00028487.2012.683471
17. Gido, K.B. et al. 2013. Multi-decadal responses of native and introduced fishes to natural and altered flow regimes in the American Southwest. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 70. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2012-0441
18. Holden, P.B. ed. 1999. Flow recommendations for the San Juan River. San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program. Albuquerque, NM: USFWS.
19. John, K.R. 1963. The effect of torrential rains on the reproductive cycle of Rhinichthys osculus in the Chiricahua Mountains, Arizona. Copeia, 1963, 286-291. doi:10.2307/1441345
20. Jowett, I.G. and Biggs, B.J.F. 2009. Application of the 'natural flow paradigm' in a New Zealand context. River Research and Applications, 25, 1126-1135. doi:10.1002/rra.1208
21. Kennard, M.J. et al. 2010. Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of hydrologic metrics for ecohydrological studies. River Research and Applications, 26, 137-156.
22. Kennard, M.J. et al. 2007. Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 64, 1346-1359. doi:10.1139/f07-108
23. Manly, B.F.J. 2007. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
24. Mathews, R. and Richter, B.D. 2007. Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43, 1400-1413. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00099.x
25. Mims, M.C. and Olden, J.D. 2012. Life history theory predicts fish assemblage response to hydrologic regimes. Ecology, 93, 35-45.
26. Minckley, W.L. and Marsh, P.C. 2009. Inland fishes of the Greater Southwest: chronicle of a vanishing biota. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
27. Moore, S.L. and Thorp, J.H. 2008. Coping with hydrogeomorphic variations in a prairie river: resiliency in young-of-the-year fishes. River Research and Applications, 24, 267-278. doi:10.1002/rra.1057
28. Müller, H.-G. and Stadtmüller, U. 2005. Generalized functional linear models. Annals of Statistics, 33, 774-805. doi:10.1214/009053604000001156
29. Naiman, R.J. et al. 2008. Flow variability and the biophysical vitality of river systems. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 340, 629-643. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2008.01.002
30. Olden, J.D. and Kennard, M.J. 2010. Intercontinental comparison of fish life history strategies along a gradient of hydrologic variability. In: K.B. Gido and D.A. Jackson, eds. Community ecology of stream fishes: concepts, approaches, and techniques. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, 83-107.
31. Olden, J.D. Kennard, M.J. and Pusey, B.J. 2012. A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology. Ecohydrology, 5, 503-518. doi:10.1002/eco.251
32. Olden, J.D. and Poff, N.L. 2003. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications, 19, 101-121. doi:10.1002/rra.700
33. Olden, J.D. Poff, N.L. and Bestgen, K.R. 2006. Life-history strategies predict fish invasions and extirpations in the Colorado River Basin. Ecological Monographs, 76, 25-40. doi:10.1890/05-0330
34. Paukert, C. and Rogers, R.S. 2004. Factors affecting condition of flannelmouth suckers in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Arizona. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 24, 648-653. doi:10.1577/M03-087.1
35. Peterson, J.T. and Rabeni, C.F. 1996. Natural thermal refugia for temperate warmwater stream fishes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 16, 738-746. doi:10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016<0738:NTRFTW>2.3.CO;2
36. Poff, N.L. and Allan, J.D. 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology, 76, 606-627. doi:10.2307/1941217
37. Poff, N.L. and Ward, J.V. 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46, 1805-1818. doi:10.1139/f89-228
38. Poff, N.L. and Zimmerman, J.K.H. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 55, 194-205. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x
39. Poff, N.L. et al. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience, 47, 769-784. doi:10.2307/1313099
40. Poff, N.L. et al. 2010. The Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology, 55, 147-170. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x
41. Priestley, M.B. 1991. Spectral analysis and time series. London: Academic Press.
42. Propst, D.L. and Gido, K.B. 2004. Responses of native and nonnative fishes to natural flow regime mimicry in the San Juan River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 133, 922-931. doi:10.1577/T03-057.1
43. Puckridge, J.T. et al. 1998. Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49, 55-72. doi:10.1071/MF94161
44. Ramsay, J. Hooker, G. and Graves, S. 2010. Functional data analysis with R and Matlab. New York: Springer.
45. Ramsay, J.O. et al. 2011. fda: Functional Data Analysis [online]. R package version 2.2.7. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fda [Accessed 20 March 2012].
46. Ramsay, J.O. and Silverman, B.W. 2002. Applied functional data analysis: methods and case studies. New York: Springer.
47. Ramsay, J.O. and Silverman, B.W. 2006. Functional data analysis. New York: Springer.
48. R Development Core Team, 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [online]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/ [Accessed 20 March 2012].
49. Richter, B.D. et al. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology, 10, 1163-1174. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x
50. Richter, B.D. et al. 2006. A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications, 22, 297-318. doi:10.1002/rra.892
51. Roberts, M.E. et al. 2006. Reproductive ecology and food habits of the blacknose shiner, Notropis heterolepis, in northern Illinois. The American Midland Naturalist, 155, 70-83. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2006)155[0070:REAFHO]2.0.CO;2
52. Sabo, J.L. and Post, D.M. 2008. Quantifying periodic, stochastic, and catastrophic environmental variation. Ecological Monographs, 78, 19-40. doi:10.1890/06-1340.1
53. Steel, E.A. and Lange, I.A. 2007. Using wavelet analysis to detect changes in water temperature regimes at multiple scales: effects of multi-purpose dams in the Willamette River basin. River Research and Applications, 23, 351-359. doi:10.1002/rra.985
54. Stewart, G. Anderson, R. and Wohl, E. 2005. Two-dimensional modelling of habitat suitability as a function of discharge on two Colorado rivers. River Research and Applications, 21, 1061-1074. doi:10.1002/rra.868
55. Stewart-Koster, B. et al. 2011. Fish response to the temporal hierarchy of the natural flow regime in the Daly River, northern Australia. Journal of Fish Biology, 79, 1525-1544. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03072.x
56. Tedesco, P. et al. 2008. River hydrological seasonality influences life history strategies of tropical riverine fishes. Oecologia, 156, 691-702. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1021-2
57. Winemiller, K.O. and Rose, K.A. 1992. Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: implications for population regulation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 2196-2218. doi:10.1139/f92-242
58. Zeug, S.C. and Winemiller, K.O. 2007. Ecological correlates of fish reproductive activity in floodplain rivers: a life history based approach. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 64, 1291-1301. doi:10.1139/f07-094