Adolescent perceptions of cigarette appearance

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 464-468

  Ford, Allison ^a   Moodie, Crawford ^a   Mackintosh, Anne M ^a   Hastings, Gerard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; MARKETING; MOTIVATION; PACKAGING; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SMOKING; TOBACCO; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MARKETING; MOTIVATION; PRODUCT PACKAGING; PSYCHOLOGY, ADOLESCENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SCOTLAND; SMOKING; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 84901687760     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: 1464360X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt161     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. World Health Organization. Guidelines for implementation of Article 13 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (Tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, 2008. Available at: Http://www.who.int/fctc/guidelines/article-13.pdf (27 June 2013, date last accessed).
2. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill. Available at: Http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary-Business/Bills- Legislation/Bills-Search-Results/Result?bId=r4613 (27 June 2013, date last accessed).
3. European Commission. Proposal for aDirective of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Concerning the Manufacture, Presentation and Sale of Tobacco and Related Products. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.
4. Moodie C, Hastings G. Making the pack the hero, tobacco industry response to marketing restrictions in the UK: Findings from along-Term audit. Int J Ment Health Addict 2011;9:24-38.
5. Centre for Tobacco Control Research. The Packaging of Tobacco Products. Stirling. Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling, 2012.
6. Cummings KM, Morley CP, Horan JK, et al. Marketing to Americas youth: Evidence from corporate documents. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl. i):5-17.
7. Cook BL, Wayne GF, Keithly L, Connolly GN. One size does not fit all: How the tobacco industry has altered cigarette design to target consumer groups with specific psychological and psychosocial needs. Addiction 2003;98:1547-61. (Pubitemid 37373853)
8. Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Connolly GN. Designing cigarettes for women: New findings from the tobacco industry documents. Addiction 2005;100:837-51. (Pubitemid 40769828)
9. European Commission. Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document Proposal for aDirective of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Concerning the Manufacture, Presentation and Sale of Tobacco and Related Products. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.
10. Mapother J. Filters: More colour and better carbon. Tob J Int 2011;4:80-6.
11. Wray RJ, JupkaK, Berman S, et al. Young adults' perceptions about established and emerging tobacco products: Results from eight focus groups. Nicotine Tob Res 2012; 14:184-90.
12. Scheffels J. Adifference that makes adifference: Young adult smokers' accounts of cigarette brands and package design. Tob Control 2008;17:118-22.
13. Scheffels J, Sæbø G. Perceptions of plain and branded cigarette packaging among Norwegian youth and adults: Afocus group study. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15:450-6.
14. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, Cummings K. The cigarette pack as image: New evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl. i):73-80.
15. Hammond D, Dockrell M, Arnott D, et al. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth. Eur J Public Health 2009;19:631-7.
16. Germain D, Wakefield MA, Durkin SJ. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: Does plain packaging make adifference? J Adolesc Health 2010;46:385-92.
17. Ford A, Moodie C, MacKintosh AM, Hastings G. How adolescents perceive cigarette packaging and possible benefits of plain packaging. Educ Health 2013;31:83-8.
18. Olson JC, Jacoby J. Cue utilisation in the quality perception process. In: Venkatesan M, editor. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research. Chicago, IL: Association for Consumer Research, 1972: 167-79.
19. Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: Ameans-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 1988;52:2-22.
20. Borland R, Savvas S. Effects of cigarette stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes. Tob Control 2013;22:331-37. doi 10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2011-050199.
21. Hoek J, Robertson C, Hammond D, McNeill L. How do young adult women smokers perceive dissuasive cigarette sticks? Poster presented at the World Conference on Tobacco or Health, 22 March 2012, Singapore.
22. Kinnear TC, Taylor Jr. Marketing Research: An Applied Approach, 4th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
23. Parasuraman A. Marketing Research, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1991.
24. Morgan DL. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research. Methods Series 16. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Ltd, 1988.
25. Barbour RS, Kitzinger J. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage, 1999.
26. Lantz PM, Jacobson PD, Warner KE, et al. Investing in youth tobacco control: Areview of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tob Control 2000;9:47-63.
27. Black C, Eunson J, Sewel K, Murray L. Scottish Schools Adolescent Lifestyle and Substance Use Survey (SALSUS) National Report: Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use Among 13 and 15 Year Olds in Scotland in 2010. Edinburgh: NHS National Services Scotland, 2011.
28. Schlackman W, Chittenden D. Packaging research. In: Worchester RM, Downham J, editors. Consumer Market Research Handbook. Amsterdam: The Netherland: Elsevier Science, 1986: 513-36.
29. Procter T. Essentials of Marketing Research. London: Pitman Publishing, 1997.
30. Ferris Wayne G, Connolly GN. How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking: Camel cigarettes 1983-93. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl. I):32-9.
31. Bero L. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Ann Rev Public Health 2003;24:267-88. (Pubitemid 37059104)
32. Maertens R, Mladjenovic N, Soo E, White PA. Select toxicant yields and salmonellamutagenicity of mainstream smoke emissions from Canadian ''super slim'' cigarettes. SRNT Conference. Boston, MA, Abstract POS4-25.
33. Mapother J. Putting ashine on tipping. Tob J Int 2012;2:77-83.
34. BBC. MEPs tighten anti-Tobacco laws aimed at young smokers. BBC 8 October 2013. Available at: Http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24439474 (10 October 2013, date last accessed).