Steering towards sustainability requires more ecological restoration

Natureza a Conservacao

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 127-137

  Aronson, James ^a,b   Alexander, Sasha ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Atlantic forest restoration pact; Lake chilika; Networking; Puget sound; Restoration of natural capital; Working for water

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901667728     PISSN: 16790073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2013.021     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alexander S et al., 2011. Opportunities and challenges for ecological restoration within REDD+. Restoration Ecology, 19:683-89. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00822.x
2. Apostol D & Shlisky A, 2012. Restoring Temperate Forests: A North American Perspective. In: Van Andel J & Aronson J (eds.). Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 161-172. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/9781118223130.ch13
3. Aronson J, 2011. Sustainability science demands that we define our terms across diverse disciplines. Landscape Ecology, 26:457-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9586-2
4. Aronson J & Van Andel J, 2012. Restoration ecology and the path to sustainability. In: Andel J & Aronson J (eds.). Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 293-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118223130.ch22
5. Aronson J & Alexander S, 2013. Ecosystem Restoration is now a global priority: Time to roll up our sleeves. Restoration Ecology, 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.12011
6. Aronson J, Milton SJ & Blignaut J (eds.), 2007. Restoring Natural Capital: Science, Business and Practice. Washington:Island Press.
7. Aronson J et al., 1993. Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Ecosystems in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands. I. A View from the South. Restoration Ecology, 1: 8-17. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00004.x
8. Aronson J et al., 2010. The Road to Sustainability Must Bridge Three Great Divides. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185:225-236. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05281.x
9. Aronson J et al., 2011. What role should government regulation play in ecological restoration: Ongoing debate in São Paulo State, Brazil. Restoration Ecology 19:690-695. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00815.x
10. Beer C et al., 2010. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake:global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 329: 834-838. PMid:20603496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1184984
11. Beger M et al., 2010. Conservation Planning for Connectivity across Marine, Freshwater, and Terrestrial Realms. Biological Conservation, 143:565-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. biocon.2009.11.006
12. Bell SS, Fonseca MS & Motten LB, 1997. Linking Restoration and Landscape Ecology. Restoration Ecology, 5:318-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00545.x
13. Berkes F, 2004 Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18:621-630. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x
14. Brancalion PHS et al., 2012. Finding the money for tropical forest restoration. Unasylva, 63:25-34.
15. Brancalion PHS et al., 2013a. Cultural ecosystem services and popular perceptions of the benefits of an ecological restoration project in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restoration Ecology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.12025
16. Brancalion PHS et al., 2013b. How to Organize a Large Scale Ecological Restoration Program? The Framework Developed by the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact in Brazil. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105498 11.2013.817339
17. Brandt S et al., 2013. A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92:1-15. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
18. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics - IBGE, 2012. Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
19. Bullock JM et al., 2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26: 541-549. PMid:21782273. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011
20. Calmon M et al., 2011. Emerging threats and opportunities for large-scale ecological restoration in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Restoration Ecology, 19:154-158. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00772.x
21. Chilika Development Authority - CDA, 2012. Eco-Restoration. Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
22. Clewell AF & Aronson J, 2013. Ecological Restoration:Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession. 2nd Edition. Washington: Island Press. http://dx.doi. org/10.5822/978-1-59726-323-8
23. Convention on Biological Diversity - CBD, 2010. Global Biodiversity Outlook. Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
24. Cowling RM, Pierce SM & Sigwela AM, 2007. Mainstreaming the restoration of natural capital: A conceptual and operational framework. In: Aronson J, Milton SJ & Blignaut J (eds.). Restoring Natural Capital: Science, Business and Practice. Washington: Island Press. p. 305-312.
25. Cullis JDS, Gorgens AHM & Marais C, 2007. A strategic study of the impact of invasive alien plants in the high rainfall catchments and riparian zones of South Africa on total surface water yield. Water SA, 33: 35-42.
26. De Groot R et al., 2013. Benefits of investing in ecosystem restoration. Conservation Biology. http://dx.doi.org/10.111/ cobi.1215
27. Duff G et al., 2009. A collaborative design to adaptively manage for landscape sustainability in north Australia: lessons from a decade of cooperative research. Landscape Ecology, 24:1135-1143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9236-5
28. Earth Economics, 2010. Toward Implementing the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan. Tacoma: Earth Economics.
29. Earth Economics, 2013. Ecosystem Valuation Toolkit (EVT). Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
30. Flores L et al., 2013. Policy Implications of the Economic Benefits of Feeder Bluffs and 12 Other Ecosystems in Clallam County. Tacoma, Washington: Earth Economics.
31. Forman RTT, 1990. Ecologically sustainable landscapes:The role of spatial configuration. In Zonneveld IS & Forman RTT (eds.). Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. New York: Springer. p. 261-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3304-6_14
32. Garcia LC et al., 2013. Restoration challenges and opportunities for increasing landscape connectivity under the new Brazilian Forest Act. Natureza & Consevação, 11:181-185.
33. Ghosh AK, Pattnaik AK & Ballatore TJ, 2006. Chilika Lagoon:Restoring ecological balance and livelihoods through re-salinization. Tokyo: Blackwell. p. 239-255.
34. Giordano T, Blignaut J & Marais C, 2012. Natural resource management - an employment catalyst: The case of South Africa. Development Planning Division Working Paper Series no. 33. Development Bank of Southern Africa. Pretoria.
35. Harrison-Cox J et al., 2012. Puget Sound: Washington State's Best Investment. Tacoma, Washington: Earth Economics.
36. International Union for the Conservation of Nature - IUCN, 2011. Leaders define pathway to restoring 150 million hectares of lost forests. Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
37. Janzen DH, 1988. Tropical Ecological and Biocultural Restoration. Science, 239: 243-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.239.4837.243
38. Kanowski J & Catterall CP, 2010. Carbon stocks in aboveground biomass of monoculture plantations, mixed species plantations and environmental restoration plantings in northeast Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration, 11:119-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2010.00529.x
39. Kates RW et al., 2001. Sustainability Science. Science, 292:641-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386
40. King County, 2013. Watershed Investment Districts Draft Legislation. Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
41. Kumar R et al., 2011. Assessing wetland ecosystem services and poverty interlinkages: a general framework and case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56:1602-1621. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.631496
42. Lamb D, Erskine PD & Parotta JA, 2005. Restoration of Degraded Tropical Forests. Science, 1628:310.
43. Leite MS et al., 2013. Landscape ecology perspective in restoration projects for biodiversity conservation: a review. Natureza & Consevação, 11:108-118.
44. Lovell ST & Johnston DM, 2009. Creating Multifunctional Landscapes: How Can the Field of Ecology Inform the Design of the Landscape? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7:212-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/070178
45. Mansourian S, Vallauri D & Dudley N (eds.), 2005. Forest Restoration in Landscapes: Beyond Planting Trees. New York: Springer.
46. Maschinski J, 2006. Implications of population dynamic and metapopulation theory for restoration. In: Falk DA, Palmer, MA & Zedler JB (eds.). Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Washington: Island Press. p. 59-87.
47. Max-Neef MA, 2005. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53:5-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2005.01.014
48. Melo FPL et al., 2013. Scaling-up tropical forest restoration in a biodiversity hotspot: lessons learned thus far. Environmental Science & Policy. In press.
49. Mishra SR & Griffin AL, 2010. Encroachment: A threat to resource sustainability in Chilika Lake, India. Applied Geography, 30: 448-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. apgeog.2009.12.001
50. Naveh Z, 2005. Epilogue: Toward a Transdisciplinary Science of Ecological and Cultural Landscape Restoration. Restoration Ecology, 13: 228-234. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00028.x
51. Naveh Z, 2007. Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecology, 22:1437-1440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10980-007-9171-x
52. Neßhöver C et al., 2011. Investing in Ecological Infrastructure. In: Ten Brink P (eds.).The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making. London and Washington: Earthscan. p. 401-448.
53. Ostrom E, 2005. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Socio-ecological Systems. Science, 325:419-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
54. Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project - PSNERP, 2012. Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
55. Puget Sound Partnership - PSP, 2012. The 2012/2013 Action Agenda for Puget Sound. Washington State Government. Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
56. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, 2002. The Ramsar Wetland Conservation Award winners for 2002. Available from: . Access in:15 Oct 2013.
57. Ribeiro MC et al., 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142:1141-1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
58. Rodrigues RS et al., 2011. Large-scale ecological restoration of high-diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 261:1605-1613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. foreco.2010.07.005
59. Sekhar NU, 2007. Social Capital and Fisheries Management: The Case of Chilika Lake in India. EnvironmentalManagement, 39:497-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0183-0
60. Stinchfield HM, Koontz L & Sexton NR, 2009.Social and Economic Considerations for Coastal and Watershed Restoration in the Puget Sound, Washington: A Literature Review. Reston: US Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2009-1079. 78 p.
61. Suding K & Leger E, 2012. Shifting Baselines: Dynamics of Evolution and Community Change in a Changing World. In: Van Andel J & Aronson J (eds.). Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 281-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118223130.ch21
62. TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity:Ecological and Economic Foundations. London, Washington:Earthscan.
63. TEEB, 2011. Investing in Ecological Infrastructure. In: Ten Brink P (ed.).The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making. London, Washington: Earthscan.
64. Tollefson J, 2011. Brazil revisits forest code. Nature, 476:259-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/476259a
65. Turpie JK et al., 2008. The working for water programme, South Africa. Ecological Economics, 65:788-798. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.024
66. Van Dover CL et al., 2013. Ecological Restoration in the Deep Sea: Desiderata. Marine Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. marpol.2013.07.006
67. Weinstein M & Turner E (eds.), 1992 Sustainability Science:Balancing Ecology and Economy. New York: Springer.
68. Woodworth P, 2013. Our once and future planet: Restoring the world in the Climate Changing Century. Chicago:University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/ chicago/9780226081465.001.0001
69. Working for Water - WfW, 2013. Available from: . Access in: 15 Oct 2013.
70. World Commission on Environment and Development's (the Brundtland Commission) report Our Common Future, 1987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Wu J, 2010. Landscape of culture and culture of landscape:does landscape ecology need culture? Landscape Ecology, 25:1147-1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9524-8
72. Wu J, 2013a. Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape Ecology, 20:1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10980-012-9836-y
73. Wu J, 2013b. Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28:999-1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10980-013-9894-9