Complexity of metastasis-associated SDF-1 ligand signaling in breast cancer stem cells

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 21, 2014, Pages 7503-7504

  Graham, Nicholas A ^a,b   Graeber, Thomas G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; IMATINIB; PHOSPHOSPECIFIC ANTIBODY; STROMAL CELL DERIVED FACTOR 1; VEMURAFENIB;

BREAST METASTASIS; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER STEM CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL CYCLE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL POPULATION; CELL SUBPOPULATION; CYTOSKELETON; DNA DAMAGE; DRUG MIXTURE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HUMAN; IMMUNOBLOTTING; IN VIVO STUDY; LETHALITY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NOTE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INDUCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

ANIMALS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHEMOKINE CXCL12; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASTIC STEM CELLS; RECEPTORS, CXCR4; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84901660043     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1405991111     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Müller A, et al. (2001) Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature 410(6824):50-56. (Pubitemid 32225831)
2. Yi T, et al. (2014) Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals system-wide signaling pathways downstream of SDF-1/CXCR4 in breast cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E2182-E2190.
3. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF (2003) Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(7):3983-3988. (Pubitemid 36418143)
4. Drake JM, et al. (2013) Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer reveals intrapatient similarity and interpatient heterogeneity of therapeutic kinase targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(49): E4762-E4769.
5. Rubbi L, et al. (2011) Global phosphoproteomics reveals crosstalk between Bcr-Abl and negative feedback mechanisms controlling Src signaling. Sci Signal 4(166):ra18.
6. Linding R, et al. (2007) Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 12 9(7):1415-1426. (Pubitemid 46962092)
7. Matsuoka S, et al. (2007) ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316(5828):1160-1166. (Pubitemid 46877472)
8. Ballif BA, Villén J, Beausoleil SA, Schwartz D, Gygi SP (2004) Phosphoproteomic analysis of the developing mouse brain. Mol Cell Proteomics 3(11):1093-1101. (Pubitemid 40012102)
9. Olsen JV, et al. (2006) Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127(3):635-648. (Pubitemid 44647421)
10. Keshava Prasad TS, et al. (2009) Human Protein Reference Database-2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database issue): D767-D772.
11. Hornbeck PV, et al. (2012) PhosphoSitePlus: A comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 40(Database issue):D261-D270.
12. Naegle KM, et al. (2010) PTMScout, a Web resource for analysis of high throughput post-translational proteomics studies. Mol Cell Proteomics 9(11):2558-2570.
13. Gallien S, et al. (2012) Targeted proteomic quantification on quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(12): 1709-1723.
14. Francavilla C, et al. (2013) Functional proteomics defines the molecular switch underlying FGF receptor trafficking and cellular outputs. Mol Cell 51(6):707-722.
15. Kulak NA, Pichler G, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M (2014) Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat Methods 11(3):319-324.
16. Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP (2003) Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(12):6940-6945. (Pubitemid 36706372)
17. Prabakaran S, et al. (2011) Comparative analysis of Erk phosphorylation suggests a mixed strategy for measuring phospho-form distributions. Mol Syst Biol 7:482.
18. Graham NA, et al. (2012) Glucose deprivation activates a metabolic and signaling amplification loop leading to cell death. Mol Syst Biol 8:589.
19. Asmussen J, et al. (2013) MEK-dependent negative feedback underlies BCR-ABL-mediated oncogene addiction. Cancer Discov 4(2):200-215.
20. Lito P, et al. (2012) Relief of profound feedback inhibition of mitogenic signaling by RAF inhibitors attenuates their activity in BRAFV600E melanomas. Cancer Cell 22(5):668-682.
21. Zhang Y, et al. (2005) Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling network reveals dynamic modules. Mol Cell Proteomics 4(9):1240-1250. (Pubitemid 41448712)
22. Stergachis AB, MacLean B, Lee K, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, MacCoss MJ (2011) Rapid empirical discovery of optimal peptides for targeted proteomics. Nat Methods 8(12):1041-1043.