The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 41, Issue , 2014, Pages 85-89

  Frantz, Cynthia McPherson ^a   Mayer, F Stephan ^a  

^a OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Connectedness to nature; Electricity use; Environmental education; Environmentally responsible behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901651043     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ajzen I. Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. Advances in experimental social psychology 1987, Vol. 20:1-63. Academic Press, New York.
2. Aron A., Aron E.N., Tudor M., Nelson G. Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60:241-253.
3. Aron A., Aron E.N., Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 63:596-612.
4. Bekkers R., Wiepking P. Accuracy of self-reports on donations to charitable organizations. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 2011, 45(6):1369-1383.
5. Brügger A., Kaiser F.G., Roczen N. One for all? Connectedness to Nature, Inclusion of Nature, Environmental Identity, and Implicit Association with Nature. European Psychologist 2011, 16(4):324-333.
6. Cheng J.C., Monroe M.C. Connection to nature: Children's affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior 2012, 44:31-49.
7. Cialdini R., Brown S., Lewis B., Luce C., Neuberg S. Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1997, 73:481-494.
8. Clayton S. Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. Identity and the natural environment 2003, 45-65. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Clayton, S. Opotow (Eds.).
9. Coke J., Batson C., McDavis K. Empathic mediation of helping: A two stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978, 36:752-766.
10. Davis M.H., Conklin L., Smith A., Luce C. Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:713-726.
11. Davis J.L., Le B., Coy A.E. Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2011, 31:257-265.
12. Dunlap R.E., Jones R. Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of environmental sociology 2002, 482-542. Greenwood Press, London, UK. R.E. Dunlap, Michelson (Eds.).
13. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D., Mertig A.G., Jones R.E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56(3):425-442.
14. Dutcher D.D., Finley J.C., Luloff A.E., Johnson J.B. Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior 2007, 39:474-493.
15. Epstein S. The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:1097-1126.
16. Epstein S. The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research. American Psychologist 1980, 35:790-806.
17. Frantz C.M. Tapping into core social motives to drive sustainability transformation. The Solutions Journal 2014, (in press).
18. Frantz C.M., Mayer F.S. Why are we failing to take action against the emergency of climate change?. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy 2009, 9:205-222.
19. Frantz C.M., Mayer F.S., Gordon H., Handley G. Venture outdoors report: Oberlin subsample analysis. Internal report 2010.
20. Frantz C.M., Mayer F.S., Petersen J., Shammin R., Bent H. Conveying real-time feedback on resource use through empathetic gauges. Paper Presented at the ACEEE Behavior, Energy, and Climate Change Conference 2011.
21. Frantz C.M., Mayer F.S., Petersen J., Shammin M.R. What Best Predicts Resource Conservation Behavior? The Case for Connectedness to Nature 2013, (in preparation).
22. Frantz C.M., Mayer F.S., Sallee C. A children's Version of the Connectedness to Nature Scale Revised 2013, (under revision).
23. Galinsky A., Moskowitz G. Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 2000, 78:708-724.
24. Gordon H., Frantz C.M., Mayer F.S. The relationship between ego- and eco-motivation, environmental attitudes, and environmentally responsible behavior. Poster Presented at the Annual Meeting of Society for Personality and Social Psychology 2012.
25. Gosling E., Williams K.J.H. Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behavior: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010, 30:298-304.
26. Hamilton L. Self-reported and actual savings in a water conservation campaign. Environment and Behavior 1985, 17:315-326.
27. IPPC Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis 2013, Retrieved from the IPPC website: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5-SPM_Approved27Sep2013.pdf.
28. Kals E., Schumacher D., Montada L. Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior 1999, 31:178-202.
29. Lam S., Cheng S. Cross-informant agreement in reports of environmental behavior and the effect of cross-questioning on report accuracy. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34(4):508-520.
30. Leopold A. A Sand County Almanac: With essays on conservation from Round River 1949, Ballantine Books, New York.
31. Lieflander A.K., Frohlich G., Bogner F.X., Schultz P.W. Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research 2012, 1-15.
32. Markowitz E.M., Goldberg L.R., Ashton M.C., Lee K. Profiling the pro-environmental individual: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality 2012, 80:81-111.
33. Mayer F.S., Frantz C.M. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24:503-515.
34. Mayer F.S., Frantz C.M., Bruehlman-Senecal E., Dolliver K. Why is nature restorative? An integration of two competing explanations. Environment and Behavior 2009, 41:607-643.
35. NAAEE (North American Association of Environmental Educators) (2011) (retrieved 6.15.11). http://www.naaee.net/what-is-ee.
36. Nenycz-Thiel M., Beal V., Ludwichowska G., Romaniuk J. Investigating the accuracy of self-reports of brand usage behavior. Journal of Business Research 2013, 66:224-232.
37. Nisbet E.K., Zelenski J.M., Murphy S.A. The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior 2009, 41:715-740.
38. Petersen J.E., Shunturov V., Janda K., Platt G., Weinberger K. Combining real-time feedback on resource use with incentives stimulates dormitory residents to reduce electricity consumption. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2007, 8:16-33.
39. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A., Congdon R. HLM 6 hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling 2000, Scientific Software International, Inc.
40. Rideout B.E. The effect of a brief environmental problems module on endorsement of the new ecological paradigm in college students. Journal of Environmental Education 2005, 37(1):3-11.
41. Rideout B.E., Hushen K., McGinty D., Perkins S., Tate J. Endorsement of the new ecological paradigm in systematic and e-mail samples of college students. Journal of Environmental Education 2005, 36(2):15-23.
42. Schultz P.W. Assessing the structure of environmental concern: Concern for the self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2001, 21:327-339.
43. Sherburn M., Devlin A. Academic major, environmental concern, and arboretum use. Journal of Environmental Education 2004, 35(2):23-36.
44. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Guagnano G.A. The new environmental paradigm in social psychological perspective. Environment and Behavior 1995, 27:723-745.
45. Tam K.-P. Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2013, 34:64-78.
46. Tam K.-P., Lee S.-L., Chao M.M. Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2013, 49:514-521.
47. Trostle J. Connectedness to Nature and Electricity Consumption: An Interdisciplinary Study of Behavior and Emotional Response to Nature in the Union Street Housing Complex 2008, Unpublished honors thesis.
48. UNESCO Connect, the UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Educational Newsletter, III 1978, January.
49. Warner E.T., Wolin K.Y., Duncan D.T., Heil D.P., Askew S., Bennett G.G. Differential accuracy of physical activity self-report by body mass index. American Journal of Health Behavior 2012, 36:168-178.
50. Warriner G., McDougall G.H., Claxton J.D. Any data or none at all? Living with inaccuracies in self-reports of residential energy consumption. Environment & Behavior 1984, 16:503-526.