A prospective noninterventional study to document implant success and survival of the straumann bone level SLActive dental implant in daily dental practice

Quintessence International

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 499-512

  Filippi, Andreas ^a   Higginbottom, Frank L ^b   Lambrecht, Thomas ^a   Levin, Barry P ^c   Meier, Josef L ^d,e   Rosen, Paul S ^f,g   Wallkamm, Beat ^e,h   Will, Christoph ^e,i   Roccuzzo, Mario ^e,j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b Restorative Sciences and Graduate Prosthodontics   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d Elkins Park Hospital   (United States)

^e University of Maryland Dental School ^*  (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DENTAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g Zentrum für zahnärztliche Chirurgie Implantologie ^*  (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

ⁱ Zentrum für zahnärztliche Chirurgie Implantologie   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

Bone level dental implant; Daily dental practice; Noninterventional study; SLActive

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DENTAL SURGERY; EUROPE; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORTH AMERICA; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; SURGICAL FLAPS; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; WATCHFUL WAITING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORTH AMERICA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WATCHFUL WAITING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901546751     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a29611     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Koller B, Att W, Strub JR. Survival rates of teeth, implants, and double crown-retained removable prostheses: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24: 109-117.
2. Tomasi C, Wennström JL, Berglundh T. Longevity of teeth and implants: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35(Suppl 1): 23-32.
3. Ganeles J, Wismeijer D. Early and immediately restored and loaded dental implants for singletooth and partial-arch applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(Suppl): 92-102.
4. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347-359.
5. Krennmair G, Seemann R, Schmidinger S, Ewers R, Piehslinger E. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 357-366.
6. Mangano C, Mangano F, Shibli JA, Ricci M, Sammons RL, Figliuzzi M. Morse taper connection implants supporting "planned" maxillary and mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a 5-year prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1117-1124.
7. Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL, Padilla JL. Validation of dental implant systems through a review of literature supplied by system manufacturers. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 271-279.
8. Bhatavadekar N. Assessing the evidence supporting the claims of select dental implant surfaces: a systematic review. Int Dent J 2008; 58: 363-370.
9. Morris HF, Ochi S. Influence of research center on overall survival outcomes at each phase of treatment. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 129-136.
10. Bhatavadekar N. Helping the clinician make evidence-based implant selections. A systematic review and qualitative analysis of dental implant studies over a 20 year period. Int Dent J 2010; 60: 359-369.
11. Lewis MB, Klineberg I. Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature. Aust Dent J 2011; 56: 181-192.
12. Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(Suppl): 186-217.
13. Stein AE, McGlumphy EA, Johnston WM, Larsen PE. Effects of implant design and surface roughness on crestal bone and soft tissue levels in the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 910-919.
14. Hänggi MP, Hänggi DC, Schoolfield JD, Meyer J, Cochran DL, Hermann JS. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar engths. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 791-802.
15. Jung RE, Jones AA, Higginbottom FL, et al. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 260-270.
16. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 1117-1130.
17. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1372-1383.
18. Cochran DL, Bosshardt DD, Grize L, et al. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 609-617.
19. Chen S, Buser D. Implants in post-extraction sites: a literature update. In: Buser D, Wismeijer D, Belser U (eds). ITI Treatment Guide 2008. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing, 2008: 9-16.
20. Cochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(Suppl): 109-113.
21. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990; 1: 33-40.
22. Hämmerle CH, Jung RE, Sanz M, et al. Submerged and transmucosal healing yield the same clinical outcomes with two-piece implants in the anterior maxilla and mandible: interim 1-year results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 211-219.
23. Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, et al. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 152-162.
24. Buser D, Wittneben J, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 342-349.
25. Reich E, Hiller KA. Reasons for tooth extraction in the western states of Germany. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 379-383.
26. Truhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55(Suppl 5): 38-45.
27. Rodrigo D, Martin C, Sanz M. Biological complications and peri-implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implant. A prospective 5-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1224-1231.
28. Teigen K, Jokstad A. Dental implant superstructures using cobalt-chromium alloy compared with gold alloy framework veneered with ceramic or acrylic resin: a retrospective cohort study up to 18 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 853-860.
29. Bergenblock S, Andersson B, Fürst B, Jemt T. Longterm follow-up of CeraOne single-implant restorations: an 18-year follow-up study based on a prospective patient cohort. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010 June 25 [Epub ahead of print].
30. Todisco M. Early loading of implants in vertically augmented bone with non-resorbable membranes and deproteinised anorganic bovine bone. An uncontrolled prospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010; 3: 47-58.
31. Anitua E, Orive G. Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 819-826.
32. Roccuzzo M, Bonino M, Aglietta M, Dalmasso P. Tenyear results of a three arms prospective cohort study in periodontally compromised patient. Part 2: clinical results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 389-395.
33. Levin L, Ofec R, Grossmann Y, Anner R. Periodontal disease as a risk for dental implant failure over time: a long-term historical cohort study. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 732-737.
34. Lethaus B, Kälber J, Petrin G, Brandstätter A, Weingart D. Early loading of sandblasted and acidetched titanium implants in the edentulous mandible: a prospective 5-year study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 887-892.
35. Malo P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142: 310-320.
36. Barone A, Orlando B, Tonelli P, Covani U. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 219-226.
37. Booker CL, Harding S, Benzeval M. A systematic review of the effect of retention models in population-based cohort studies. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 249.
38. Dumville JC, Torgerson DJ, Hewitt CE. Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 2006; 332: 969-971.