Developing relationships between autonomous agents: Promoting pro-social behaviour through virtual learning environments part II

Handbook of Research on Agent-Based Societies: Social and Cultural Interactions

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 229-242

  Watson, Scott ^a   Dautenhahn, Kerstin ^a   Ho, Wan Ching Steve ^a   Dawidowicz, Rafal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901530027     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-236-7.ch016     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Adamson, A., & Jenson, V. (2001). Shrek.
2. Bates, J. (1994). The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 122-125.
3. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1999). Contextual design. Interactions, 6(1), 32-42.
4. Blow, M., Dautenhahn, K., Appleby, A., Nehaniv, C.L., & Lee, D.C. (2006). Perception of robot smiles and dimensions for human-robot interaction design. Conference Proceedings RO-MAN 2006 (pp. 469-474).
5. Dautenhahn, K. (2002). Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots. Conference Proceedings International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp.192-197).
6. Dautenhahn, K., Bond, A. H., Canamero, L., & Edmonds, B. (2002). Socially intelligent agents: Creating relationships with computers and robots. Massachusetts, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Dörner, D., & Hille, K. (1995). Artificial souls: Motivated emotional robots. Conference Proceedings Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 3828-3832). Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineering.
8. Druin, A., & Solomon, C. (1996). Designing mul-timedia environments for children: Computers creativity and kids. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
9. Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In A. Samuel (Ed.). Measurement and prediction. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
10. Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2006). Visual design of virtual pedagogical agents: Naturalism versus stylization and static appearance. Conference Proceedings NordiCHI 2006.
11. Hall, L., Jones, S., Hall, M., Richardson, J., & Hodgson, J. (2007). Inspiring design: the use of photo elicitation and lomography in gaining the child's perspective. Conference Proceedings Brit-ish HCI 2007.
12. Hall, L., Vala, M., Hall, M., Webster, M., Woods, S., Gordon, A., & Aylett, R. (2006). FearNot!'s appearance: Reflecting on children's expectations and perspectives. Conference Proceedings IVA 2006 (pp. 407-419). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
13. Hall, L., & Woods, S. (2004). Empathic interaction with synthetic characters: The importance of similarity. Unpublished Manuscript.
14. Hall, L., Woods, S., Aylett, R., Newall, L., & Paiva, A. (2005). Achieving empathic engagement through affective interaction with synthetic characters. Conference Proceedings ACII 2005 (pp. 731-738). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
15. Hall, L., Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., Sobral, D., Paiva, A., Wolke, D., & Newall, L. (2004). Designing empathic agents: Adults vs Kids. Conference Proceedings ITS 2004 (604-613). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
16. Hall, L., Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., & Wolke, D. (2004). FearNot! designing in the classroom. Conference Proceedings HCI 2004. London, UK: Springer-Verlaq.
17. Hinds, P., Roberts, T., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human Computer Interaction, 19, 151-181.
18. Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to media characters. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 63-101). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
19. Johnson, A., Roussos, M., Leigh, J., Vasilakis, C., Barnes, C., & Moher, T. (1998). The NICE project: learning together in a virtual world. Conference Proceedings IEEE 1998 (pp. 176-183).
20. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measuring of attitudes, New York, USA: Columbia University Press.
21. Lucero, A., & Martens, J. (2006). Mood boards: Industrial designers' perceptions of using mixed reality. SIGCHI.NL Conference 2005, HCI Close To You.
22. MacDorman, K.F. (2005). Androids as an experimental apparatus: Why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? Conference Proceedings CogSci-2005 (pp. 106-118). Stresa, Italy.
23. Martens, J., Lucero, A., Naalijkens, B., Ekeler, B., Rammeloo, G., van Heist, M., Kwak, M., & Sakovich, M. (2006). Blue Eye - making mood boards in augmented reality. HCI 2006, University of London, UK.
24. McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York, USA: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.
25. Moffat, R. (1997). Personality parameters and programs. In R. Trappl, & P. Petta (Eds.). Creating personality for synthetic actors. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlaq.
26. Mori, M. (1970). Bukimi no tani: The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
27. Müller, M.J., Wildman, D.M., & White, E.A. (1993). 'Equal opportunity' PD using PICTIVE. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 64-65.
28. Oosterholt, R., Kusano, M., & de Vries, G. (1996). Interaction design and human factors support, in the development of a personal communicator for children. Conference Proceedings CHI'96 (pp. 557-564).
29. Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing, and attitude measurement (2nd Ed.). London, UK: Pinter.
30. Øritsland, T.A., & Buur, J. (2003). Interaction styles: A aesthetic sense of direction in interface design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15(1), 67-85.
31. Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R., Sobreperez, P., Woods, S., Zoll, C. & Hall, L., (2004). Caring for agents and agents that care: Building empathic relations with synthetic agents. Conference Proceedings AAMAS 2004 (pp. 194-201).
32. Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R., Woods, S., Hall, L., & Zoll, C. (2005). Learning by feeling: evoking empathy with synthetic characters. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19, 235-266.
33. Raven, M.E., & Flanders, A. (1996). Using contextual inquiry to learn about your audiences. Journal of Computer Documentation, 20(1), 1-13.
34. Richardson, J. (2006). Designing a water safety environment using lomography. Unpublished MSc dissertation, University of Sunderland, UK.
35. rd ACM/IEEE Human-Robot Interaction conference (HRI08).
36. Russel, J.A., & Fernández-Dols, J.M. (2002). The psychology of facial expression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Sakaguchi, H. (2001). Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.
38. Scaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F., & Davies, M. (1997). Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. Conference Proceedings CHI'97 (pp. 343-350).
39. Schuler, D., & Mamioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Sengers, P. (1998). Do the right thing: An architecture for action-expression. Conference Proceedings AGENTS'98 (pp. 24-31).
41. nd Ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
42. Stotland, E., Mathews, K. E., Sherman, S. E., Hannson, R. O., & Richardson, B. Z. (1978). Empathy, fantasy and helping. Beverly Hills, USA: Sage.
43. Tannenbaum, P. H., & Gaer, E. P. (1965). Mood change as a function of stress of protagonist and degree of identification in a film viewing situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 612-616.
44. Thomas, F., & Johnston, O. (1981). The illusion of life: Disney animation. Walt Disney Animation.
45. von Feilitzen, C., & Linne, O. (1975). Identifying with television characters. Journal of Communication, 25(4), 51-55.
46. Walters, M. (2007). The design space for robot appearance and behaviour for robot companions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
47. Watson, S., Vannini, N., Davis, M., Woods, S., Hall, M., Hall, L., & Dautenhahn, K. (2007). FearNot! an anti-Bullying Intervention: Evaluation of an interactive virtual learning environment. Conference Proceedings AISB'07 (pp. 446-452).
48. Webb, B.R. (1996). The role of users in interactive system design: When computers are theatre, do we want the audience to write the script? Behaviour and Information Technology, 15(2), 76-83.
49. Wechsler, L. (2002). Why is this man smiling? Digital animators are closing in on the complex systems that makes a face come alive. Wired, 10(6). Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.06/face.html
50. Wispé, L. (1987). A history of the concept of empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.). Empathy and its Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., & Schulz, J. (2004). The design space of robots: Investigating children's views. Conference Proceedings RO-MAN 2004 (pp. 47-52). New Jersey, USA: IEEE.
52. Woods, S., Hall, L., Sobral, D., Dautenhahn, K., & Wolke, D. (2003) A study into the believability of animated characters in the context of bullying intervention. Conference Proceedings IVA 2003 (pp. 310-314). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
53. Woods, S., Hall, L., Sobral, D., Dautenhahn, K., & Wolke, D. (2005). Animated characters in bullying intervention. Conference Proceedings IVA 2003 (pp. 310-314). Berlin, Germany: Springer.