Supporting narrative retells for people with aphasia using augmentative and alternative communication: Photographs or line drawings? Text or no text?

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Griffith, Julie ^a   Dietz, Aimee ^a   Weissling, Kristy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Augmentative and alternative communication; Personally relevant; Text; Visual supports

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA, BROCA; CASE REPORT; COMMUNICATION AID; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA, BROCA; COMMUNICATION; COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY, EPISODIC; MIDDLE AGED; NARRATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; SPACE PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84901473613     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0089     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
2. Brandenburg, C., Worrall, L., Rodriguez, A. D., & Copland, D. (2013). Mobile computing technology and aphasia: An integrated review of accessibility and potential uses. Aphasiology, 27, 444-461
3. Cherney, L. (1998). Pragmatics and discourse: An introduction. In L. R. Cherney, B. B. Shadden, & C. A. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 1-7). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
4. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
5. Dietz, A., Ball, A., & Griffith, J. (2011). Reading and writing with aphasia in the 21st century: Technological applications of supported reading comprehension and written expression. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 18, 758-769
6. Dietz, A., Beukelman, D. R., & McKelvey, M. (2006). Visual scene display (VSD): New AAC interfaces for persons with aphasia. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 13-17
7. Dietz, A., Hux, K., McKelvey, M. L., Beukelman, D. R., & Weissling, K. (2009). Reading comprehension by people with chronic aphasia: A comparison of three levels of visuographic contextual support. Aphasiology, 23, 1053-1064
8. Dietz, A., Weissling, K., Griffith, J., & McKelvey, M. (2012, July- August). Personalizing AAC for people with aphasia: The role of text and visuographic supports. Seminar presented at the 2012 International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Pittsburgh, PA.
9. Elman, R. J., & Larsen, S. (2010, May). Computer and Internet use among people with aphasia. Paper presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Isle of Palms, SC.
10. Fox, L., Sohlberg, M. M., & Fried-Oken, M. (2001). Effects of conversational topic choice on outcomes of an augmentative communication intervention for adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 171-200
11. Garrett, K., & Beukelman, D. R. (1995). Changes in interaction patterns of an individual with severe aphasia given three types of partner support. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 237-251
12. Garrett, K. L., & Huth, C. (2002). The impact of graphic contextual information and instruction on the conversational behaviors of a person with severe aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 523-536
13. Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
14. Koul, R., Corwin, M., & Hayes, S. (2005). Production of graphic symbol sentences by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of a computer-based augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Brain and Language, 92, 58-77
15. Lindsay, J., & Wilkinson, R. W. (1999). Repair sequences in aphasic talk: A comparison of aphasic speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations. Aphasiology, 13, 305-325
16. McKelvey, M., Dietz, A., Hux, K., Weissling, K., & Beukelman, D. R. (2007). Performance of a person with chronic aphasia using a visual scene display prototype. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 305-317
17. McKelvey, M., Hux, K., Dietz, A., & Beukelman, D. R. (2010). Impact of personal relevance and contextualization on word picture matching by people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 22-33
18. McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107-116
19. McNeil, M. R., & Pratt, S. R. (2001). Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition. Aphasiology, 15, 901-911
20. Smith, C. E., & Garrett, K. L. (2005, November). Comprehension of contextual vs. decontextual written choices in severe aphasia. Poster presented at the Annual American Speech-Language- Hearing Association Convention, San Diego, CA.
21. True, G., Bartlett, M. R., Fink, R., Linebarger, M., & Schwartz, M. (2010). Perspectives of persons with aphasia towards Sentence Shaper To Go: A qualitative study. Aphasiology, 24, 1032-1050
22. Wallace, S., Dietz, A., Hux, K., & Weissling, K. (2012). Augmented input: The effect of visuographic supports on the auditory comprehension of people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 162-176
23. Wallace, S., & Hux, K. (2014). Effect of two layouts on high technology AAC navigation and content location by people with aphasia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9, 173-182. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.799237