Entrainment of neural oscillations as a modifiable substrate of attention

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 300-309

  Calderone, Daniel J ^a   Lakatos, Peter ^b   Butler, Pamela D ^a,b,c   Castellanos, F Xavier ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Dyslexia; EEG; Entrainment; Schizophrenia; Selective attention

Indexed keywords

AIR ENTRAINMENT; DISEASES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS; DYSLEXIA; INTRINSIC OSCILLATIONS; NEURAL OSCILLATIONS; PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SELECTIVE ATTENTION;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ATTENTION; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DELTA RHYTHM; DYSLEXIA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; EPILEPSY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; MACACA; MENTAL DISEASE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NEUROFEEDBACK; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; PHONEME; REVIEW; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPEECH; STRIATE CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORKING MEMORY; ANIMAL; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PERIODICITY;

EID: 84901457257     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Raichle M.E. Two views of brain function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:180-190.
2. Sporns O. Networks of the Brain 2011, MIT Press.
3. Stone J.L., Hughes J.R. Early history of electroencephalography and establishment of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 30:28-44.
4. Thut G., et al. The functional importance of rhythmic activity in the brain. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R658-R663.
5. Buzsáki G. Rhythms of the Brain 2006, Oxford University Press.
6. Thut G., Miniussi C. New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS-EEG studies. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:182-189.
7. Schroeder C.E., et al. Dynamics of active sensing and perceptual selection. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2010, 20:172-176.
8. Vanrullen R., et al. Ongoing EEG phase as a trial-by-trial predictor of perceptual and attentional variability. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2:60.
9. Buzsaki G., Watson B.O. Brain rhythms and neural syntax: implications for efficient coding of cognitive content and neuropsychiatric disease. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2012, 14:345-367.
10. Henry M.J., Obleser J. Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:20095-20100.
11. Lakatos P., et al. Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science 2008, 320:110-113.
12. Lakatos P., et al. The spectrotemporal filter mechanism of auditory selective attention. Neuron 2013, 77:750-761.
13. Arnal L.H., Giraud A.L. Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:390-398.
14. Rohenkohl G., et al. Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory information. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:8424-8428.
15. Mathewson K.E., et al. Rescuing stimuli from invisibility: inducing a momentary release from visual masking with pre-target entrainment. Cognition 2010, 115:186-191.
16. Schroeder C.E., Lakatos P. The gamma oscillation: master or slave?. Brain Topogr. 2009, 22:24-26.
17. Schroeder C.E., Lakatos P. Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32:9-18.
18. Lakatos P., et al. The leading sense: supramodal control of neurophysiological context by attention. Neuron 2009, 64:419-430.
19. Zion Golumbic E.M., et al. Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective. Brain Lang. 2012, 122:151-161.
20. Ding N., Simon J.Z. Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:11854-11859.
21. Giraud A.L., Poeppel D. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:511-517.
22. Schroeder C.E., et al. Neuronal oscillations and visual amplification of speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:106-113.
23. Zion Golumbic E.M., et al. Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party". Neuron 2013, 77:980-991.
24. Thut G., et al. Entrainment of perceptually relevant brain oscillations by non-invasive rhythmic stimulation of the human brain. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2:170.
25. de Graaf T.A., et al. Alpha-band rhythms in visual task performance: phase-locking by rhythmic sensory stimulation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e60035.
26. Mathewson K.E., et al. Making waves in the stream of consciousness: entraining oscillations in EEG alpha and fluctuations in visual awareness with rhythmic visual stimulation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:2321-2333.
27. Neuling T., et al. Good vibrations: oscillatory phase shapes perception. Neuroimage 2012, 63:771-778.
28. Jaegle A., Ro T. Direct control of visual perception with phase-specific modulation of posterior parietal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 26:422-432.
29. Ng B.S.W., et al. A precluding but not ensuring role of entrained low-frequency oscillations for auditory perception. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:12268-12276.
30. Cravo A.M., et al. Temporal expectation enhances contrast sensitivity by phase entrainment of low-frequency oscillations in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:4002-4010.
31. Stefanics G., et al. Phase entrainment of human delta oscillations can mediate the effects of expectation on reaction speed. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:13578-13585.
32. Lakatos P., et al. Predictive suppression of cortical excitability and its deficit in schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:11692-11702.
33. Canolty R.T., Knight R.T. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:506-515.
34. Landau A.N., Fries P. Attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:1000-1004.
35. Busch N.A., VanRullen R. Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:16048-16053.
36. Busch N.A., et al. The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:7869-7876.
37. Besle J., et al. Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:3176-3185.
38. Gomez-Ramirez M., et al. Oscillatory sensory selection mechanisms during intersensory attention to rhythmic auditory and visual inputs: a human electrocorticographic investigation. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:18556-18567.
39. Goswami U. A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:3-10.
40. Thomson J.M., Goswami U. Rhythmic processing in children with developmental dyslexia: auditory and motor rhythms link to reading and spelling. J. Physiol. Paris 2008, 102:120-129.
41. Soltész F., et al. Differential entrainment of neuroelectric delta oscillations in developmental dyslexia. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e76608.
42. Leong V., Goswami U. Assessment of rhythmic entrainment at multiple timescales in dyslexia: evidence for disruption to syllable timing. Hear. Res. 2013, 308:141-161.
43. McAvinue L.P., et al. A componential analysis of visual attention in children with ADHD. J. Atten. Disord. 2012, 10.1177/1087054712461935.
44. Laasonen M., et al. Project DyAdd: visual attention in adult dyslexia and ADHD. Brain Cogn. 2012, 80:311-327.
45. Ortega R., et al. Exogenous orienting of visual-spatial attention in ADHD children. Brain Res. 2012, 1493:68-79.
46. Johnstone S.J., et al. Ten years on: a follow-up review of ERP research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 124:644-657.
47. Mullane J.C., Klein R.M. Literature review: visual search by children with and without ADHD. J. Atten. Disord. 2008, 12:44-53.
48. Stevens A.A., et al. Increased sensitivity to perceptual interference in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2012, 18:511-520.
49. Arns M., et al. A decade of EEG theta/beta ratio research in ADHD: a meta-analysis. J. Atten. Disord. 2013, 17:374-383.
50. Gevensleben H., et al. Distinct EEG effects related to neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2009, 74:149-157.
51. Gevensleben H., et al. Is neurofeedback an efficacious treatment for ADHD? A randomised controlled clinical trial. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2009, 50:780-789.
52. Bakhshayesh A.R., et al. Neurofeedback in ADHD: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2011, 20:481-491.
53. Lofthouse N., et al. A review of neurofeedback treatment for pediatric ADHD. J. Atten. Disord. 2012, 16:351-372.
54. Gevensleben H., et al. Neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: 6-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2010, 19:715-724.
55. Arns M., et al. Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: the effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: a meta-analysis. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2009, 40:180-189.
56. Basar E., Guntekin B. A review of brain oscillations in cognitive disorders and the role of neurotransmitters. Brain Res. 2008, 1235:172-193.
57. Lenz D., et al. Altered evoked gamma-band responses reveal impaired early visual processing in ADHD children. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1985-1993.
58. Mazaheri A., et al. Functional disconnection of frontal cortex and visual cortex in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2010, 67:617-623.
59. Gomarus H.K., et al. Do children with ADHD and/or PDD-NOS differ in reactivity of alpha/theta ERD/ERS to manipulations of cognitive load and stimulus relevance?. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120:73-79.
60. Missonnier P., et al. EEG anomalies in adult ADHD subjects performing a working memory task. Neuroscience 2013, 241:135-146.
61. Cheung C.H., et al. Aetiology for the covariation between combined type ADHD and reading difficulties in a family study: the role of IQ. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2012, 53:864-873.
62. Fries P. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:474-480.
63. Cashdollar N., et al. Hippocampus-dependent and -independent theta-networks of active maintenance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:20493-20498.
64. Anderson K.L., et al. Theta oscillations mediate interaction between prefrontal cortex and medial temporal lobe in human memory. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1604-1612.
65. Luo H., et al. Auditory cortex tracks both auditory and visual stimulus dynamics using low-frequency neuronal phase modulation. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000445.
66. Romei V., et al. Sounds reset rhythms of visual cortex and corresponding human visual perception. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:807-813.
67. Schyns P.G., et al. Cracking the code of oscillatory activity. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001064.
68. Arnal L.H. Predicting "when" using the motor system's beta-band oscillations. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:225.
69. Sohal V.S. Insights into cortical oscillations arising from optogenetic studies. Biol. Psychiatry 2012, 71:1039-1045.
70. Fiebelkorn I.C., et al. Ready, set, reset: stimulus-locked periodicity in behavioral performance demonstrates the consequences of cross-sensory phase reset. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:9971-9981.
71. Thorne J.D., et al. Cross-modal phase reset predicts auditory task performance in humans. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:3853-3861.
72. Lakatos P., et al. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:1904-1911.
73. Tort A.B.L., et al. Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:1195-1210.
74. Hoch T., et al. Modulation of the amplitude of gamma-band activity by stimulus phase enhances signal encoding. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 33:1223-1239.
75. Onslow A.C.E., et al. Quantifying phase-amplitude coupling in neuronal network oscillations. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2011, 105:49-57.
76. Ozkurt T.E., Schnitzler A. A critical note on the definition of phase-amplitude cross-frequency coupling. J. Neurosci. Methods 2011, 201:438-443.
77. Fiebelkorn I.C., et al. Cortical cross-frequency coupling predicts perceptual outcomes. Neuroimage 2013, 69:126-137.
78. Buzsaki G. Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers. Neuron 2010, 68:362-385.
79. Kramer M.A., et al. Sharp edge artifacts and spurious coupling in EEG frequency comodulation measures. J. Neurosci. Methods 2008, 170:352-357.
80. Kropotov J.D. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Quantitative EEG, Event-related Potentials and Neurotherapy 2009, 393-419. Elsevier.
81. Moriyama T.S., et al. Evidence-based information on the clinical use of neurofeedback for ADHD. Neurotherapeutics 2012, 9:588-598.
82. Leins U., et al. Neurofeedback for children with ADHD: a comparison of SCP- and theta/beta-protocols. Prax. Kinderpsychol. Kinderpsychiatr. 2006, 55:384-407. (in German).