Lepton flavor violation in the Standard Model with general dimension-six operators

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Crivellin, A ^a   Najjari, S ^b   Rosiek, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; Rare decays

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901456409     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2014)167     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. J. Beringer et al., Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001.
2. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Infrared Singularities and Massive Fields, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2856.
3. S. Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1995).
4. A.M. Baldini et al., MEG Upgrade Proposal, arXiv:1301.7225.
5. B. Aubert et al., Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation in the Decays eγ and μγ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 021802 [arXiv:0908.2381].
6. K. Hayasaka et al., New search for → eγ and → μγ decays at Belle, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 16 [arXiv:0705.0650].
7. J. Adam et al., New constraint on the existence of the μ+ → e+γ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 201801 [arXiv:1303.0754].
8. K. Hayasaka et al., Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced + Pairs, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 139 [arXiv:1001.3221].
9. U. Bellgardt et al., Search for the Decay μ+ → e+e+e, Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988) 1.
10. J. Baron et al., Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron, Science 343 (2014) 269 [arXiv:1310.7534].
11. G.W. Bennett et al., An Improved Limit on the Muon Electric Dipole Moment, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 052008 [arXiv:0811.1207].
12. K. Inami et al., Search for the electric dipole moment of the tau lepton, Phys. Lett. B 551 (2003) 16 [hep-ex/0210066].
13. F. Borzumati and A. Masiero, Large Muon and electron Number Violations in Supergravity Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 961.
14. A. Brignole and A. Rossi, Anatomy and phenomenology of mu-tau lepton flavor violation in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 701 (2004) 3 [hep-ph/0404211].
15. P. Paradisi, Constraints on SUSY lepton flavor violation by rare processes, JHEP 10 (2005) 006 [hep-ph/0505046].
16. W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, S. Gori, P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, Anatomy and Phenomenology of FCNC and CPV Effects in SUSY Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 17 [arXiv:0909.1333].
17. J. Girrbach, S. Mertens, U. Nierste and S. Wiesenfeldt, Lepton flavour violation in the MSSM, JHEP 05 (2010) 026 [arXiv:0910.2663].
18. P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 1-Billion Muon Decays, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421.
19. A. Ilakovac and A. Pilaftsis, Flavor violating charged lepton decays in seesaw-type models, Nucl. Phys. B 437 (1995) 491 [hep-ph/9403398].
20. J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe and M. Yamaguchi, Lepton flavor violation via right-handed neutrino Yukawa couplings in supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 2442 [hep-ph/9510309].
21. J. Hisano and K. Tobe, Neutrino masses, muon g-2 and lepton flavor violation in the supersymmetric seesaw model, Phys. Lett. B 510 (2001) 197 [hep-ph/0102315].
22. K.S. Babu and C. Kolda, Higgs mediated → 3μ in the supersymmetric seesaw model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 241802 [hep-ph/0206310].
23. A. Masiero, S.K. Vempati and O. Vives, Massive neutrinos and flavor violation, New J. Phys. 6 (2004) 202 [hep-ph/0407325].
24. A. Dedes, H.E. Haber and J. Rosiek, Seesaw mechanism in the sneutrino sector and its consequences, JHEP 11 (2007) 059 [arXiv:0707.3718].
25. S. Antusch, E. Arganda, M.J. Herrero and A.M. Teixeira, Impact of theta(13) on lepton flavour violating processes within SUSY seesaw, JHEP 11 (2006) 090 [hep-ph/0607263].
26. A. Ilakovac, A. Pilaftsis and L. Popov, Charged lepton flavor violation in supersymmetric low-scale seesaw models, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 053014 [arXiv:1212.5939].
27. A. Ilakovac, A. Pilaftsis and L. Popov, Lepton Dipole Moments in Supersymmetric Low-Scale Seesaw Models, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015001 [arXiv:1308.3633].
28. A. de Gouvea, S. Lola and K. Tobe, Lepton flavor violation in supersymmetric models with trilinear R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 035004 [hep-ph/0008085].
29. A. Abada, S. Davidson and M. Losada, Neutrino masses and mixings in the MSSM with soft bilinear R(p) violation, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 075010 [hep-ph/0111332].
30. A. Dedes, S. Rimmer and J. Rosiek, Neutrino masses in the lepton number violating MSSM, JHEP 08 (2006) 005 [hep-ph/0603225].
31. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, B. Duling, A. Poschenrieder and C. Tarantino, Charged Lepton Flavour Violation and (g-2)(mu) in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-Parity: A Clear Distinction from Supersymmetry, JHEP 05 (2007) 013 [hep-ph/0702136].
32. S. Kanemura et al., Search for lepton flavor violation in the Higgs boson decay at a linear collider, Phys. Lett. B 599 (2004) 83 [hep-ph/0406316].
33. S. Kanemura, T. Ota and K. Tsumura, Lepton flavor violation in Higgs boson decays under the rare tau decay results, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 016006 [hep-ph/0505191].
34. P. Paradisi, Higgs-mediated → μ and → e transitions in II Higgs doublet model and supersymmetry, JHEP 02 (2006) 050 [hep-ph/0508054]. (Pubitemid 43346664)
35. A. Crivellin, A. Kokulu and C. Greub, Flavor-phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models with generic Yukawa structure, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 094031 [arXiv:1303.5877].
36. A.J. Buras, C. Grojean, S. Pokorski and R. Ziegler, FCNC Effects in a Minimal Theory of Fermion Masses, JHEP 08 (2011) 028 [arXiv:1105.3725].
37. G. D'Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036].
38. V. Cirigliano, B. Grinstein, G. Isidori and M.B. Wise, Minimal flavor violation in the lepton sector, Nucl. Phys. B 728 (2005) 121 [hep-ph/0507001].
39. E. Nikolidakis and C. Smith, Minimal Flavor Violation, Seesaw and R-parity, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015021 [arXiv:0710.3129].
40. B.M. Dassinger, T. Feldmann, T. Mannel and S. Turczyk, Model-independent analysis of lepton flavour violating tau decays, JHEP 10 (2007) 039 [arXiv:0707.0988].
41. J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A minimal set of top anomalous couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 812 (2009) 181 [arXiv:0811.3842].
42. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP 07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876].
43. B. Grzadkowski, Z. Hioki, K. Ohkuma and J. Wudka, Probing anomalous top quark couplings induced by dimension-six operators at photon colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 689 (2004) 108 [hep-ph/0310159].
44. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621.
45. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884].
46. A. Goudelis, O. Lebedev and J.-h. Park, Higgs-induced lepton flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012) 369 [arXiv:1111.1715].
47. G. Blankenburg, J. Ellis and G. Isidori, Flavour-Changing Decays of a 125 GeV Higgs-like Particle, Phys. Lett. B 712 (2012) 386 [arXiv:1202.5704].
48. R. Harnik, J. Kopp and J. Zupan, Flavor Violating Higgs Decays, JHEP 03 (2013) 026 [arXiv:1209.1397].
49. M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, The Bases of Effective Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 556 [arXiv:1307.0478].
50. V.A. Smirnov, Asymptotic expansions in limits of large momenta and masses, Commun. Math. Phys. 134 (1990) 109.
51. J. de Blas, M. Chala and J. Santiago, Global Constraints on Lepton-Quark Contact Interactions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 095011 [arXiv:1307.5068].
52. M. Cadoret et al., Combination of Bloch oscillations with a Ramsey-Borde interferometer: New determination of the fine structure constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 230801 [arXiv:0810.3152].
53. A. Crivellin, J. Girrbach and U. Nierste, Yukawa coupling and anomalous magnetic moment of the muon: an update for the LHC era, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 055009 [arXiv:1010.4485].
54. G.F. Giudice, P. Paradisi and M. Passera, Testing new physics with the electron g-2, JHEP 11 (2012) 113 [arXiv:1208.6583].
55. M. Passera, The Standard model prediction of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, J. Phys. G 31 (2005) R75 [hep-ph/0411168].
56. M. Passera, Status of the standard model prediction of the muon g-2, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 155 (2006) 365 [hep-ph/0509372].
57. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the Hadronic Contributions to the Muon g-2 and to alpha(MZ), Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1515 [Erratum ibid. C 72 (2012) 1874] [arXiv:1010.4180].
58. K. Hagiwara, R. Liao, A.D. Martin, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, (g 2)μ and (M2Z ) re-evaluated using new precise data, J. Phys. G 38 (2011) 085003 [arXiv:1105.3149].
59. T. Blum et al., The Muon (g-2) Theory Value: Present and Future, arXiv:1311.2198.
60. M. Fael, L. Mercolli and M. Passera, Towards a determination of the tau lepton dipole moments, arXiv:1301.5302.
61. B. Jamieson et al., Measurement of P(mu)xi in polarized muon decay, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 072007 [hep-ex/0605100].
62. J.F. Nieves and P.B. Pal, Generalized Fierz identities, Am. J. Phys. 72 (2004) 1100 [hep-ph/0306087].
63. G. Aarons et al., International Linear Collider Reference Design Report Volume 2: Physics at the ILC, arXiv:0709.1893.
64. P. Abreu et al., Search for lepton flavor number violating Z0 decays, Z. Phys. C 73 (1997) 243.