메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

Using logic model methods in systematic review synthesis: Describing complex pathways in referral management interventions

Author keywords

Demand management; Evidence synthesis; Logic model; Methodology; Referral management; Referral systems; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA MINING; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 84901429050     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-62     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (73)

References (25)
  • 1
    • 0242606334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic review of the effect of primary care-based service innovations on quality and patterns of referral to specialist secondary care
    • A systematic review of the effect of primary care-based service innovations on quality and patterns of referral to specialist secondary care. Faulkner A, Mills N, Bainton D, Baxter K, Kinnersley P, Peters TJ, Sharp D, Brit J Gen Pract 2003 53 878 884 (Pubitemid 37383811)
    • (2003) British Journal of General Practice , vol.53 , Issue.496 , pp. 878-884
    • Faulkner, A.1    Mills, N.2    Bainton, D.3    Baxter, K.4    Kinnersley, P.5    Peters, T.J.6    Sharp, D.7
  • 2
    • 0002258239 scopus 로고
    • Nothing as practical as a good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families
    • Washington DC: Aspen Institute Connell JP, Kubisch AC, Schoor LB, Weiss CH
    • Nothing as practical as a good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. Weiss CH, New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives Washington DC: Aspen Institute, Connell JP, Kubisch AC, Schoor LB, Weiss CH, 1995 65 69
    • (1995) New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives , pp. 65-69
    • Weiss, C.H.1
  • 3
    • 0035885159 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The challenge of complexity in healthcare
    • 10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625 11557716
    • The challenge of complexity in healthcare. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T, BMJ 2001 323 625 628 10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625 11557716
    • (2001) BMJ , vol.323 , pp. 625-628
    • Plsek, P.E.1    Greenhalgh, T.2
  • 4
    • 66249087280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Complexity in medicine and healthcare: People and systems, theory and practice
    • 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01204.x 19522904
    • Complexity in medicine and healthcare: people and systems, theory and practice. Miles A, J Eval Clin Pract 2009 15 409 410 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009. 01204.x 19522904
    • (2009) J Eval Clin Pract , vol.15 , pp. 409-410
    • Miles, A.1
  • 5
    • 0346159242 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence-based policy: The promise of realist synthesis
    • 10.1177/135638902401462448
    • Evidence-based policy: the promise of realist synthesis. Pawson R, Evaluation 2002 8 340 358 10.1177/135638902401462448
    • (2002) Evaluation , vol.8 , pp. 340-358
    • Pawson, R.1
  • 6
    • 84968752497 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Theory-based evaluation: Reflections ten years on
    • Theory-based evaluation: reflections ten years on. Rogers PJ, N Dir Eval 2007 114 63 81
    • (2007) N Dir Eval , vol.114 , pp. 63-81
    • Rogers, P.J.1
  • 8
    • 37649019292 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions
    • 10.1177/1356389007084674
    • Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Rogers PJ, Evaluation 2008 14 29 48 10.1177/1356389007084674
    • (2008) Evaluation , vol.14 , pp. 29-48
    • Rogers, P.J.1
  • 9
    • 84866395564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of decision makers' perceptions
    • doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001220 22942232
    • Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers' perceptions. Wallace J, Nwosu B, Clarke M, BMJ Open 2012 2 001220 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001220 22942232
    • (2012) BMJ Open , vol.2 , pp. 5001220
    • Wallace, J.1    Nwosu, B.2    Clarke, M.3
  • 10
    • 77950875312 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Synthesizing diverse evidence: The use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews
    • 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.01.002
    • Synthesizing diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews. Baxter S, Baxter S, Killoran A, Kelly M, Goyder E, Pub Health 2010 124 99 106 10.1016/j.puhe.2010. 01.002
    • (2010) Pub Health , vol.124 , pp. 99-106
    • Baxter, S.1    Baxter, S.2    Killoran, A.3    Kelly, M.4    Goyder, E.5
  • 11
    • 84870679191 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the health benefits of advice services: Using research evidence and logic model methods to explore complex pathways
    • 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01087.x
    • Assessing the health benefits of advice services: using research evidence and logic model methods to explore complex pathways. Allmark P, Baxter S, Goyder E, Guillaume L, Crofton-Martin G, Health Soc Care Comm 2013 21 59 68 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01087.x
    • (2013) Health Soc Care Comm , vol.21 , pp. 59-68
    • Allmark, P.1    Baxter, S.2    Goyder, E.3    Guillaume, L.4    Crofton-Martin, G.5
  • 12
    • 84901467961 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • EPPI-Centre London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London
    • EPPI-Centre, Methods for Conducting Systematic Reviews London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London 2010
    • (2010) Methods for Conducting Systematic Reviews
  • 18
    • 47749126232 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
    • DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
    • Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. Thomas A, Harden A, BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 8 doi:10.1186/1471-2288- 8-45 (Pubitemid 352033066)
    • (2008) BMC Medical Research Methodology , vol.8 , pp. 45
    • Thomas, J.1    Harden, A.2
  • 19
    • 34250376920 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Theory-based evaluation: Past present and future
    • Theory-based evaluation: past present and future. Weiss CH, N Dir Eval 1997 76 68 81
    • (1997) N Dir Eval , vol.76 , pp. 68-81
    • Weiss, C.H.1
  • 20
    • 35348829062 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a pod or apples and oranges?
    • 10.1177/1356389007082129
    • Theories of change and realistic evaluation: peas in a pod or apples and oranges? Blamey A, Mackenzie M, Evaluation 2007 13 439 455 10.1177/ 1356389007082129
    • (2007) Evaluation , vol.13 , pp. 439-455
    • Blamey, A.1    Mackenzie, M.2
  • 21
    • 0034998791 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: Opportunities and problems
    • DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00257.x
    • Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, Roberts K, J Eval Clin Pract 2001 2 125 133 (Pubitemid 32489006)
    • (2001) Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice , vol.7 , Issue.2 , pp. 125-133
    • Dixon-Woods, M.1    Fitzpatrick, R.2    Roberts, K.3
  • 22
    • 84884171494 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
    • doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
    • Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S, BMC Med Res Methodol 2013 13 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
    • (2013) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.13
    • Gale, N.K.1    Heath, G.2    Cameron, E.3    Rashid, S.4    Redwood, S.5
  • 24
    • 84901390808 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluating the state of quality-improvement science through evidence synthesis: Insights from the Closing the Quality Gap Series
    • 10.7812/TPP/13-010 24079357
    • Evaluating the state of quality-improvement science through evidence synthesis: insights from the Closing the Quality Gap Series. McDonald KM, Schultz EM, Chang C, Perm J 2013 17 52 61 10.7812/TPP/13-010 24079357
    • (2013) Perm J , vol.17 , pp. 52-61
    • McDonald, K.M.1    Schultz, E.M.2    Chang, C.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.