Pharmacy journal abstracts published in PubMed that abide by the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 110-114

  Blair, Daniel A ^a   Hughes, Peter J ^a   Woolley Jr , Thomas W ^a  

^a SAMFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; MEDLINE; PHARMACY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PHARMACY; PUBLISHING; PUBMED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84901418901     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.010     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. US National Library of Medicine. Fact sheet: MEDLINEH [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: The Library [20 Feb 2013; cited 3 May 2013]., http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/ medline.html.
2. Saint S, Christakis DA, Saha S, Elmore JG, Welsh DE, Baker P, Koepsell TD. Journal reading habits of internists. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Dec;15(12):881-4.
3. Barry HC, Ebell MH, Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC, Nietzke F. Family physicians' use of medical abstracts to guide decision making: style or substance? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(6):437-42.
4. Ward LG, Kendrach MG, Price SO. Accuracy of abstracts for original research articles in pharmacy journals. Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):1173-7.
5. Pitkin RM, Branagan MA, Burmeister LF. Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. JAMA. 1999 Mar 24-31;281(12):1110-1.
6. Harris AH, Standard S, Brunning JL, Casey SL, Goldberg JH, Oliver L, Ito K, Marshall JM. The accuracy of abstracts in psychology journals. J Psychol. 2002 Mar;136(2):141-8.
7. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, Schulz KF. CONSORT Group. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 22;5(1):e20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pmed.0050020.
8. Hopewell S, Ravaud P, Baron G, Boutron I. Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ. 2012 Jun 22;344:e4178. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4178.
9. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1191-4.
10. Faggion CM Jr, Giannakopoulos NN. Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and implant dentistry: a survey. J Periodontol. 2012 Oct;83(10):1251-6.
11. Fleming PS, Buckley N, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Pandis N. Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Oct;142(4):451-8.
12. Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92.
13. Knobloch K, Vogt PM. Adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting suggestions in surgical randomized-controlled trials published in Annals of Surgery [letter]. Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):546; author reply 546-7.
14. Chen Y, Li J, Ai C, Duan Y, Wang L, Zhang M, Hopewell S. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals. PLoS One. 2010 Aug;5(8):e11926. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011926.
15. Wang L, Li Y, Li J, Zhang M, Xu L, Yuan W, Wang G, Hopewell S. Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine. Trials. 2010 Jul 8;11:75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1745-6215-11-75.
16. Ghimire S, Kyung E, Kang W, Kim E. Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four highimpact general medical journals. Trials. 2012 Jun 7;13:77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-77.
17. Altwairgi AK, Booth CM, Hopman WM, Baetz TD. Discordance between conclusions stated in the abstract and conclusions in the article: analysis of published randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy in lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct;30(28):3552-7.
18. Vera-Badillo FE, Shapiro R, Ocana A, Amir E, Tannock IF. Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 May;24(5):1238-44.
19. Seehra J, Wright NS, Polychronopoulou A, CobourneMT, Pandis N. Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in dental specialty journals. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2013 Mar;13(1):1-8.
20. Tfelt-Hansen PC. CONSORT recommendations in abstracts of randomised, controlled trials on migraine and headache. J Headache Pain. 2011 Oct;12(5):505-10.
21. Can OS, Yilmaz AA, Hasdogan M, Alkaya F, Turhan SC, Can MF, Alanoglu Z. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? a survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jul;28(7):485-92.
22. Diallo S, Cour F, Josephson A, Vidart A, Botto H, Lebret T, Bonan B. Evaluating single-incision slings in female stress urinary incontinence: the usefulness of the CONSORT statement criteria. Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3): 535-41.