Monocular distance estimation from optic flow during active landing maneuvers

Bioinspiration and Biomimetics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Van Breugel, Floris ^a   Morgansen, Kristi ^b   Dickinson, Michael H ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

insect flight; landing; observability; range finding

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; OBSERVABILITY; RANGE FINDING;

DISTANCE ESTIMATION; INSECT FLIGHT; LANDING TRAJECTORY; MOTOR ACTIONS; NON LINEAR CONTROL; POSITION AND VELOCITY ESTIMATION; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; VISUAL CONTROL;

LANDING;

AIRCRAFT; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMIMETICS; COMPOUND EYE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FLYING; MONOCULAR VISION; OPTIC FLOW; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

AIRCRAFT; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BIOMIMETICS; COMPOUND EYE, ARTHROPOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OPTIC FLOW; ROBOTICS; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 84901408703     PISSN: 17483182     EISSN: 17483190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/9/2/025002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Koenderink J J 1986 Optic flow Vis. Res. 26 161-80 (Pubitemid 16154404)
2. Wittlinger M, Wehner R and Wolf H 2006 The ant odometer: stepping on stilts and stumps Science 312 1965-7 (Pubitemid 43993725)
3. Gibson J J 1958 Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals Br. J. Psychol. 49 182-94
4. Gibson J J 1950 The Perception of the Visual World (Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press)
5. Besl P J 1988 Active, optical range imaging sensors Mach. Vis. Appl. 1 127-52
6. Van Breugel F and Dickinson M H 2012 The visual control of landing and obstacle avoidance in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol. 215 1783-98
7. Srinivasan M V, Zhang S W, Chahl J S, Barth E and Venkatesh S 2000 How honeybees make grazing landings on flat surfaces Biol. Cybern. 83 171-83
8. Wang Y and Frost B J 1992 Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons Nature 356 236-8
9. Chahl J S, Srinivasan M V and Zhang S W 2004 Landing strategies in honeybees and applications to uninhabited airborne vehicles Int. J. Robot. Res. 23 101-10
10. Evangelista C, Kraft P, Dacke M, Reinhard J and Srinivasan M V 2010 The moment before touchdown: landing manoeuvres of the honeybee apis mellifera J. Exp. Biol. 213 262-70
11. Tammero L F and Dickinson M H 2002 Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol. 205 2785-98 (Pubitemid 35180885)
12. Borst A and Bahde S 1986 What kind of movement detector is triggering the landing response of the housefly Biol. Cybern. 55 59-69 (Pubitemid 17073330)
13. Lehrer M, Srinivasan M V and Zhang S W 1988 Motion cues provide the bee's visual world with a third dimension Nature 332 356-7
14. Lehrer M 1996 Small-scale navigation in the honeybee: active acquisition of visual information about the goal J. Exp. Biol. 199 253-61 (Pubitemid 126603959)
15. Cartwright B A and Collett T S 1979 How honey-bees know their distance from a near-by visual landmark J. Exp. Biol. 82 367-72
16. Collett T S and Harkness L I K 1982 Depth vision in animals Analysis of Visual Behavior ed D J Ingle, M A Goodale and R J W Mansfield (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 111-76
17. Pentland A P 1987 A new sense for depth of field IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 9 523-31
18. Land M F and Nilsson D-E 2012 Animal Eyes (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
19. Verri A and Torre V 1986 Absolute depth estimate in stereopsis J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3 297
20. Walls G L 1943 Factors in human visual resolution J. Opt. Soc. Am. 33 487-505
21. Sobel E C 1990 The locust's use of motion parallax to measure distance J. Comp. Physiol. A 167 579-88
22. Wallace G K 1959 Visual scanning in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria Forskal J. Exp. Biol. 36 512-25
23. Collett T S 1978 Peering - a locust behavior pattern for obtaining motion parallax information J. Exp. Biol. 76 237-41
24. Poteser M, Pabst M A and Kral K 1998 Proprioceptive contribution to distance estimation by motion parallax in a praying mantis J. Exp. Biol. 201 1483-91 (Pubitemid 28286245)
25. Nijmeijer H and Van der Schaft A J 1990 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems (New York: Springer)
26. Krener A J and Ide K 2009 Measures of unobservability Proc. 48th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (Shanghai, Dec. 2009) pp 6401-6
27. Hinson B T and Morgansen K A 2012 Flowfield estimation in the wake of a pitching and heaving airfoil Proc. American Control Conf. (Montréal, June 2012)
28. Crassidis J L and Junkins J L 2012 Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems (London: Chapman and Hall)
29. Fischler M A and Bolles R C 1981 Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography Commun. ACM 24 381-95 (Pubitemid 12444102)
30. Van der Merwe R and Wan E A 2001 The square-root unscented Kalman filter for state and parameter-estimation IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Salt Lake City, UT, May 2001) vol 6 pp 3461-4 (Pubitemid 32838365)
31. Straw A D, Lee S and Dickinson M H 2010 Visual control of altitude in flying Drosophila Curr. Biol. 20 1550-6
32. Stocker A A 2005 Analog integrated 2D optical flow sensor Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 46 121-38
33. Alaeddini A and Morgansen K A 2013 Autonomous state estimation using optic flow sensing Proc. American Control Conf. (Washington, DC, June 2013)
34. Fry S N, Rohrseitz N, Straw A D and Dickinson M H 2009 Visual control of flight speed in Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol. 212 1120-30
35. Rohrseitz N and Fry S N 2011 Behavioural system identification of visual flight speed control in Drosophila melanogaster J. R. Soc. Interface 8 171-85
36. Medici V and Fry S N 2012 Embodied linearity of speed control in Drosophila melanogaster J. R. Soc. Interface 9 3260-7