Single versus subdivided population strategies in breeding against an adverse genetic correlation

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 605-617

  Hallingbäck, Henrik R ^a   Sánchez, Leopoldo ^b   Wu, Harry X ^a,c  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b National Institute for Agricultural Research   (France)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adverse genetic correlation; Breeding strategy; Finite locus model; Multiple population; Pleiotropy; Subline

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901401236     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-014-0707-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aubry CA, Adams WT, Fahey TD (1998) Determination of relative economic weights for multitrait selection in coastal Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 28: 1164-1170.
2. Baker RJ (1986) Selection indices in plant breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
3. Berlin M, Lönnstedt L, Jansson G, Danell Ö, Ericsson T (2010) Developing a Scots pine breeding objective: a case study involving a Swedish sawmill. Silva Fenn 44(4): 643-656.
4. Brisbane JR, Gibson JP (1995) Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic relationships in selection decisions. Theor Appl Genet 91: 421-431.
5. Burdon RD, Namkoong G (1983) Short note: multiple populations and sublines. Silvae Genet 32(5-6): 221-222.
6. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 237-268.
7. Chen Y, Lübberstedt T (2010) Molecular basis of trait correlations. Trends Plant Sci 15: 454-461. doi: 10. 1016/j. tplants. 2010. 05. 004.
8. Conner JK (2002) Genetic mechanisms of floral trait correlations in a natural population. Nature 420: 407-410. doi: 10. 1038/nature01105.
9. Dungey HS, Brawner JT, Burger F, Carson MJ, Henson M, Jefferson PA, Matheson AC (2009) A new breeding strategy for Pinus radiata in New Zealand and New South Wales. Silvae Genet 58: 28-38.
10. Eckert AJ, Bower AD, Wegrzyn JL, Pande B, Jermstad KD, Krutovsky KV, St Clair JB, Neale DB (2009) Association genetics of coastal Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii, Pinaceae). I. Cold-hardiness related traits. Genetics 182: 1289-1302. doi: 10. 1534/genetics. 109. 102350.
11. Finkey DJ (1962) Genetic gains under three methods of selection. Genet Res 3: 417-423.
12. Fries A (2012) Genetic parameters, genetic gain and correlated responses in growth, fibre dimensions and wood density in a Scots pine breeding population. Ann For Sci 69: 783-794. doi: 10. 1007/s13595-012-0202-7.
13. Gromko MH (1995) Unpredictability of correlated response to selection: pleiotropy and sampling interact. Evolution 49(4): 685-693.
14. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genet Sel Evol 33: 209-229.
15. Hazel LN (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28: 476-490.
16. Hill WG, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2008) Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genet 4(2): e1000, 008. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pgen. 1000008.
17. Ivković M, Wu HX, McRae TA, Powell MB (2006) Developing breeding objectives for radiata pine structural wood production. I. Bioeconomic model and economic weights. Can J For Res 36: 2920-2931. doi: 10. 1139/X06-161.
18. Jayawickrama KJS, Carson MJ (2000) A breeding strategy for the New Zealand radiata pine breeding cooperative. Silvae Genet 49(2): 82-90.
19. Jones AG, Arnold SJ, Bürger R (2003) Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57(8): 1747-1760. doi: 10. 1554/02-631.
20. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, 1st edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
21. McKeand SE, Bridgwater FE (1998) A strategy for the third breeding cycle of loblolly pine in the southeastern US. Silvae Genet 47(4): 223-234.
22. McKeand SE, Mullin TJ, Byram T, White TL (2003) Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the south. J For 101(3): 32-37.
23. Namkoong G (1976) A multiple-index selection strategy. Silvae Genet 25(5-6): 199-201.
24. Rozenberg P, Cahalan C (1997) Spruce and wood quality: genetic aspects (a review). Silvae Genet 46(5): 270-279.
25. Sánchez L, Yanchuk AD, King JN (2007) Gametic models for multitrait selection schemes to study variance of response and drift under adverse genetic correlations. Tree Genet Genomes 4: 201-212. doi: 10. 1007/s11295-007-0101-5.
26. Stoehr MU, Yanchuk AD, Xie CY, Sánchez L (2008) Gain and diversity in advanced generation coastal Douglas-fir selections for seed production populations. Tree Genet Genomes 4: 193-200. doi: 10. 1007/s11295-007-0100-6.
27. White TL, Huber DA, Powell GL (2003) Third-cycle breeding strategy for slash pine by the cooperative forest genetics research program. In: McKinley CR (ed) Proceedings of the 27th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, pp 17-29.
28. White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007) Advanced-generation breeding strategies. In: Forest Genetics, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK, pp 479-522.
29. Williams CG, Savolainen O (1996) Inbreeding depression in conifers: Implications for breeding strategy. For Sci 42(1): 102-117.
30. Wu HX, Sánchez L (2011) Effect of selection method on genetic correlation and gain in a two trait selection scheme. Aust For 74(1): 36-42.
31. Wu HX, Eldridge KG, Matheson AC, Powell MB, McRae TA, Butcher TB, Johnson IG (2007) Achievements in forest tree improvement in Australia and New Zealand. 8. Successful introduction and breeding of radiata pine in Australia. Aust For 70(4): 215-225.
32. Wu HX, Ivković M, Gapare WJ, Matheson AC, Baltunis BS, Powell MB, McRae TA (2008) Breeding for wood quality and profit in Pinus radiata: a review of genetic parameter estimates and implications for breeding and deployment. New Zealand J For Sci 38(1): 56-87.
33. Yamada Y, Yokouchi K, Nishida A (1975) Selection index when genetic gains of individual traits are of primary concern. Jpn J Genet 50(1): 33-41.
34. Yanchuk AD, Sánchez L (2011) Multivariate selection under adverse genetic correlations: impacts of population sizes and selection strategies on gains and coancestry in forest tree breeding. Tree Genet Genomes 7(6): 1169-1183. doi: 10. 1007/s11295-011-0404-4.
35. Young SSY (1961) A further examination of the relative efficiency of three methods of selection for genetic gains under less-restricted conditions. Genet Res 2: 106-121.