Gametic models for multitrait selection schemes to study variance of response and drift under adverse genetic correlations

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 201-212

  Sánchez, Leopoldo ^a   Yanchuk, Alvin A ^b   King, John N ^b  

^a National Institute for Agricultural Research   (France)

^b RESEARCH BRANCH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Linkage; Optimum selection; Pleiotropy

Indexed keywords

CORYLUS AMERICANA;

EID: 38949124363     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-007-0101-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barton NH (1990) Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. Genetics 124:773-782
2. Bennett GL, Swiger LA (1980) Genetic variance and correlation after selection for two traits by index, independent culling levels and extreme selection. Genetics 94:763-775
3. Brisbane JR, Gibson JP (1995) Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic relationships in selection decisions. Theor Appl Genet 91:421-431
4. Bulmer M (1985) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon, Oxford
5. Caballero A (1989) Efficiency in prediction of response in selection index experiments. J Anita Breed Genet 106:187-194
6. Campo JL, Rodriguez C (1986) Experimental comparison of methods for simultaneous selection of two correlated traits in Tribolium. 2. Index selection and independent culling levels: a replicated single generation test. Genet Sel Evol 18:431-445
7. Conner JK (2002) Genetic mechanisms of floral trait correlations in a natural population. Nature 420:407-410
8. Doolittle DP, Wilson SP, Hulbert LL (1972) A comparison of multiple trait selection methods in the mouse. J Heredity 63:366-372
9. Eagles HA, Frey KJ (1974) Expected and actual gains in economic value of oat lines from five selection methods. Crop Science 14:861-864
10. Elsik C, Williams CG (2002) Low-copy microsatellite recovery from a conifer genome. Theor Appl Genet 103:1189-1195
11. Finney DJ (1962) Genetic gains under three methods of selection. Genet Res 3:417-423
12. Gimelfarb A (1992) Pleiotropy and multilocus polymorphisms. Genetics 130:223-227
13. Hazel LN, Lush JL (1942) The efficiency of three methods of selection. J Heredity 33:393-399
14. Hedrick PW (1999) Antagonistic pleiotropy and genetic polymorphism: a perspective. Heredity 82:126-133
15. Hill WG (1977) International Conference in Quantitative Genetics. In: Pollak E, Kempthorne O, Bailey TB (eds) Variation in response to selection. Iowa State University Press, Ames
16. Ieiri S, Nomura T, Hirooka H, Satoh M (2004) A comparison of restricted selection procedures to control genetic gains. J Anita Breed Genet 121:90-100
17. Kearsey MJ, Farquhar AGL (1998) QTL analysis in plants, where are we now? Heredity 80:137-142
18. King JN, Hansen J (1997) Cost-effective selection strategies in continued genetic improvement. In IUFRO Genetics of Radiata pine. FRI Bulletin no. 203. Rotorua, New Zealand, pp 192-198 (December 1997)
19. King JN, Yeh FC, Heaman JC, Dancik BP (1988) Selection of wood density and diameter in controlled crosses of coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet 37:152-157
20. Lande R (1984) The genetic correlation between characters maintained by selection, linkage and inbreeding. Genet Res 44:309-320
21. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
22. Merilä J, Sheldon BC (1999) Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83:103-109
23. Meuwissen THE (1997) Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 75:934-940
24. Nicholas F (1989) Incorporation of new reproductive technology in genetic improvement programmes. In: Hill WG, MacKay TFC (eds) Evolution and animal breeding. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, pp 203-209
25. Nomura T (1997) A simulation study on variation to response to selection and population size required for selection programs. J Anita Breed Genet 114:13-21
26. Nomura T, Yamaguchi S, Mukai F, Yamamoto A (2002) Optimization of selection and mating schemes in closed broiler lines. Anim Sci J 73:435-443
27. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Rendel JM (1963) Correlation between the number of scutellar and abdominal bristles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 48:391-408
29. Roff DA (1997) Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman & Hall, London
30. Sanchez L, Bijma P, Woolliams JA (2003) Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations. Genetics 164:1589-1595
31. Sen BK, Robertson A (1964) An experimental examination of methods for the simultaneous selection of two characters using Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 50:199-209
32. Sgrò CM, Hoffmann AA (2004) Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation. Heredity 93:241-248
33. Stebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, London
34. Villanueva B, Kennedy BW (1993) Index versus tandem selection after repeated generations of selection. Theor Appl Genet 85:706-712
35. Young SY (1961) A further examination of the relative efficiency of three methods of selection for genetic gains under less-restricted conditions. Genet Res 2:106-121
36. Zobel BJ, Jett JB (1995) Genetics of wood production. Springer, Berlin