Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment

HSS Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 170-178

  Lebl, Darren R ^a,b   Hughes, Alex ^a,b   Cammisa Frank P , F P ^a,b   O'Leary, Patrick F ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

cervical spine; myelopathy; natural history; operative treatment; spondylosis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960963659     PISSN: 15563316     EISSN: 15563324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11420-011-9208-1     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Arnold JG, Jr. The clinical manifestations of spondylochondrosis (spondylosis) of the cervical spine. Ann Surg 1955; 141: 872-89.
2. Barnes MP, Saunders M. The effect of cervical mobility on the natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 17-20.
3. Batzdorf U, Batzdorff A. Analysis of cervical spine curvature in patients with cervical spondylosis. Neurosurgery 1988; 22: 827-36.
4. Blackley HR, Plank LD, Robertson PA. Determining the sagittal dimensions of the canal of the cervical spine. The reliability of ratios of anatomical measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 110-2.
5. Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 1178-84.
6. Brain WR, Northfield D, Wilkinson M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain 1952; 75: 187-225.
7. Breig A, Turnbull I, Hassler O. Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis. A study on fresh cadaver material. J Neurosurg 1966; 25: 45-56.
8. Brodke DS, Gollogly S, Alexander Mohr R, et al. Dynamic cervical plates: biomechanical evaluation of load sharing and stiffness. Spine 2001; 26: 1324-9.
9. Brodke DS, Klimo P, Jr., Bachus KN, et al. Anterior cervical fixation: analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1566-73.
10. Chiles BW, 3rd, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 762-9.
11. Clarke E, Robinson PK. Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain 1956; 79: 483-510.
12. Edwards WC, LaRocca H. The developmental segmental sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 20-7.
13. Fehlings MG KB, Arnold PM, Yoon ST, Vaccaro AR. Anterior vs Posterior Surgical Approaches to Treat Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Outcomes of the Prospective Multi-center AOSPine North America CSM Study in 280 Patients. Cervical Spine Research Society 38th Annual Meeting 2010: 86-8.
14. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2310-7.
15. Fouyas IP, Statham PF, Sandercock PA. Cochrane review on the role of surgery in cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 736-47.
16. Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Hiroshima K, et al. Morphometry of the cervical spinal cord and its relation to pathology in cases with compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13: 1212-6.
17. Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Ebara S, et al. The prognosis of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. An analysis of the factors involved. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71: 393-8.
18. Glaser JA CJ, Bailey KL, Morrow DL. Cervical spinal cord compression and the Hoffman sign. Iowa Ortho J 2001; 21: 49-51.
19. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004; 17: 79-85.
20. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 2047-51.
21. Hacker RJ. Cervical disc arthroplasty: a controlled randomized prospective study with intermediate follow-up results. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 424-8.
22. Hashimoto M, Mochizuki M, Aiba A, et al. C5 palsy following anterior decompression and spinal fusion for cervical degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1702-10.
23. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 519-28.
24. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, et al. A simple performance test for quantifying the severity of cervical myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 1210-3.
25. Hukuda SMT, Ogata M, Schichikawa K, Shimomura T. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67B: 609-15.
26. Ito T, Oyanagi K, Takahashi H, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinicopathologic study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21: 827-33.
27. Kadanka Z, Bednarik J, Vohanka S, et al. Conservative treatment versus surgery in spondylotic cervical myelopathy: a prospective randomised study. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 538-44.
28. Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednanik J, et al. Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 2205-10; discussion 10-1.
29. Kaneyama S, Sumi M, Kanatani T, et al. Prospective Study and Multivariate Analysis of the Incidence of C5 Palsy After Cervical Laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010.
30. Koyanagi T, Hirabayashi K, Satomi K, et al. Predictability of operative results of cervical compression myelopathy based on preoperative computed tomographic myelography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993; 18: 1958-63.
31. Lees F, Turner JW. Natural History and Prognosis of Cervical Spondylosis. Br Med J 1963; 2: 1607-10.
32. Matsumoto M, Toyama Y, Ishikawa M, et al. Increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on magnetic resonance images in cervical compressive myelopathy. Does it predict the outcome of conservative treatment? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 677-82.
33. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Tsuji T, et al. Risk factors for closure of lamina after open-door laminoplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9: 530-7.
34. Matz PG, Anderson PA, Holly LT, et al. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 104-11.
35. Mikawa Y, Shikata J, Yamamuro T. Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987; 12: 6-11.
36. Morishita Y, Naito M, Hymanson H, et al. The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 877-83.
37. Muhle C, Weinert D, Falliner A, et al. Dynamic changes of the spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylosis at flexion and extension using magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 444-9.
38. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972; 95: 87-100.
39. Ogino H, Tada K, Okada K, et al. Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 1-15.
40. Ohnari H, Sasai K, Akagi S, et al. Investigation of axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty, using questionnaire survey. Spine J 2006; 6: 221-7.
41. Oshima Y TK, Seichi A, Morii J, Chikuda H, Kawaguchi H, Nakaura K. Natural Course and Prognostic Factors for Mild Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Cervical Spine Research Society 2010; 38th Annual Meeting: 83.
42. Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, et al. Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology 1987; 164: 771-5.
43. Payne EE, Spillane JD. The cervical spine; an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain 1957; 80: 571-96.
44. Porchet F, Metcalf NH. Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 17: E6.
45. Regan CM DGD, Lim MR. Cervical Spine Research Society, 38th Annual Meeting. Paper # 60 2010: 199.
46. Riew KD, Buchowski JM, Sasso R, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2354-64.
47. Roberts A. Myelopathy due to cervical spondylosios treated by collar immobilization. Neurology 1966; 16: 951-4.
48. Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 417-23.
49. Sadasivan KK, Reddy RP, Albright JA. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Yale J Biol Med 1993; 66: 235-42.
50. Sekhon LH. Two-level artificial disc placement for spondylotic cervical myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci 2004; 11: 412-5.
51. Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy: 18-month results. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 17: E8.
52. Shin JJ. Intramedullary high signal intensity and neurological status as prognostic factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152(10): 1687-94.
53. Smith MD, Emery SE, Dudley A, et al. Vertebral artery injury during anterior decompression of the cervical spine. A retrospective review of ten patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 410-5.
54. Stark RJ, Kennard C, Swash M. Hand wasting in spondylotic high cord compression: an electromyographic study. Ann Neurol 1981; 9: 58-62.
55. Wolf BS, Khilnani M, Malis L. The sagittal diameter of the bony cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis. J Mt Sinai Hosp N Y 1956; 23: 283-92.
56. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, et al. Neurologic complications of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991; 16: 1277-82.