Does elective or emergent operative status influence outcomes in patients undergoing implantation of left ventricular assist devices?

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Tsiouris, Athanasios ^a   Morgan, Jeffrey A ^a   Nemeh, Hassan W ^a   Hodari, Arielle ^a   Shah, Rupen ^a   Brewer, Robert J ^a   Paone, Gaetano ^a  

^a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DEVICE INFECTION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMBOLIC STROKE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE FAILURE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INFECTION; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; LIVER DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL RATE; THROMBOSIS; AGE DISTRIBUTION; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART FAILURE; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; MORTALITY; PREVALENCE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; COMORBIDITY; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, RIGHT;

EID: 84901375576     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: 15226662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.2013298     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barbone A, Rao V, Oz MC, Naka Y. 2002. LVAD Support in patients with bioprosthetic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 74:232-4. (Pubitemid 34734677)
2. Boyle AJ, Ascheim DD, Russo MJ, et al. 2011. Clinical outcomes for continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients stratified by pre-operative INTERMACS classification. J Heart Lung Transplant 30:402-7.
3. Craver JM, Weintraub WS, Jones EL, Guyton RA, Hatcher CR Jr. 1992. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary angioplasty. A 10-year experience. Ann Surg 215:425-33; discussion 433-4.
4. Christakis GT, Weisel RD, David TE, Salerno TA, Ivanov J. 1988. Predictors of operative survival after valve replacement. Circulation 78(3 Pt 2):I25-34.
5. Cowger J, Sundareswaran K, Rogers JG, et al. 2013. Predicting survival in patients receiving continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: the HeartMate II risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:313-21.
6. Czer LS, Gray RJ, DeRobertis MA, et al. 1984. Mitral valve replacement: impact of coronary artery disease and determinants of prognosis after revascularization. Circulation 70(3 Pt 2):I198-207.
7. Geissler HJ, Hölzl P, Marohl S, et al. 2000. Risk stratification in heart surgery: comparison of six score systems. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:400-6. (Pubitemid 30204488)
8. Granton J, Cheng D. 2008. Risk stratification models for cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 12:167-74.
9. John R, Kamdar F, Liao K, Colvin-Adams M, Boyle A, Joyce L. 2008. Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events using the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as a bridge-to-transplant. Ann Thorac Surg 86:1227-35.
10. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, et al. 2013. Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 32:141-56.
11. Kolh P. 2006. Importance of risk stratification models in cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 27:768-9.
12. LaPar DJ, Hennessy S, Fonner E, Kern JA, Kron IL, Ailawadi G. 2010. Does urgent or emergent status influence choice in mitral valve operations? An analysis of outcomes from the Virginia Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative. Ann Thorac Surg 90:153-60.
13. Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, et al. 2007. Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation 116:497-505. (Pubitemid 47450258)
14. Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, et al. 2007. Use of a continuousflow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med 357:885-96. (Pubitemid 47347322)
15. Nilsson J, Algotsson L, Höglund P, Lührs C, Brandt J. 2006. Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery. Eur Heart J 27:867-74.
16. Oz MC, Goldstein DJ, Pepino P, et al. 1995. Screening scale predicts patients successfully receiving long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices. Circulation 92(9 Suppl):II169-73.
17. Pagani FD, Miller LW, Russell SD, et al. 2009. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:312-21.
18. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, et al. 2009. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med 361:2241-51.
19. Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, Rogers JG, et al. 2010. Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:S1-39.
20. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. 2001. Long-term use of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 345:1435-43.
21. Song HK, Kindem M, Bavaria JE, et al. 2012. Long-term implications of emergency versus elective proximal aortic surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome in the Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Cardiovascular Conditions Consortium Registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:282-6.
22. Stark KS, Satler LF, Krucoff MW, Rackley CE, Kent KM. 1990. Myocardial salvage after failed coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:78-82. (Pubitemid 20034254)
23. Stepanenko A, Potapov EV, Jurmann B, et al. 2010. Outcomes of elective versus emergent permanent mechanical circulatory support in the elderly: a single-center experience. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:61-5.
24. Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Young JB, et al. 2009. INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture. J Heart Lung Transplant 28:535-41.
25. Teuteberg JJ, Ewald GA, Adamson RM, et al. 2012. Risk assessment for continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: does the destination therapy risk score work? An analysis of over 1,000 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:44-51.
26. Thourani VH, Weintraub WS, Craver JM, et al. 2000. Influence of concomitant CABG and urgent/emergent status on mitral valve replacement surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 70:778-83; discussion 783-4.
27. Wendt D, Osswald BR, Kayser K, et al. 2009. Society of Thoracic Surgeons score is superior to the EuroSCORE determining mortality in high-risk patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 88:468-74; discussion 474-5.
28. Yang C, Li D, Mennett R, et al. 2012 Urgent aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: does an 'urgent' status increase morbidity and mortality? J Heart Valve Dis 21:487-93.