Ruggedness and reproducibility of the MBEC biofilm disinfectant efficacy test

Journal of Microbiological Methods

Volumn 102, Issue , 2014, Pages 55-64

  Parker, A E ^a,b   Walker, D K ^a   Goeres, D M ^a   Allan, N ^c   Olson, M E ^c   Omar, A ^c  

^a Montana State University   (United States)

^b MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Innovotech Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biofilm; Reproducibility; Ruggedness

Indexed keywords

CHLORINE; DISINFECTANT AGENT; OXIDIZING AGENT; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; QUATERNARY AMMONIUM DERIVATIVE;

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; ASSAY; BIOFILM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; INCUBATION TIME; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; MINIMUM BIOFILM ERADICATION CONCENTRATION ASSAY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; REPRODUCIBILITY; RUGGEDNESS; STANDARDIZATION; TEMPERATURE; ULTRASOUND; CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG EFFECTS; EVALUATION STUDY; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; MULTICENTER STUDY; PH; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIME;

BIOFILMS; DISINFECTANTS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SONICATION; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84901346112     PISSN: 01677012     EISSN: 18728359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ASTM research report RR:E35-1006 Interlaboratory Study for ASTM Method E2799-11 Standard Test Method for Testing Disinfectant Efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Using the MBEC Assay 2011, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
2. ASTM standard E1054 Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Inactivators of Antimicrobial Agents 2013, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
3. ASTM standard E2196 Standard Test Method for Quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Grown with Medium Shear and Continuous Flow Using Rotating Disk Reactor 2012, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
4. ASTM standard E2562 Standard Test Method for Quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Grown with High Shear and Continuous Flow using CDC Biofilm Reactor 2012, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
5. ASTM standard E2647 Standard Test Method for Quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Grown Using Drip Flow Biofilm Reactor with Low Shear and Continuous Flow 2013, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
6. ASTM standard E2799 Standard Test Method for Testing Disinfectant Efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm using the MBEC Assay 2012, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
7. ASTM standard E2935 Standard Practice for Conducting Equivalence Testing in Laboratory Applications 2013, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
8. ASTM standard E691 Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method 2013, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
9. Behnke S., Parker A., Woodall D., Camper A. Comparing the chlorine disinfection of detached biofilm clusters with sessile biofilms and planktonic cells in single and dual species cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77(20):7176-7184.
10. Buckingham-Meyer K., Goeres D., Hamilton M. Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests. J. Microbiol. Methods 2007, 70:236-244.
11. Ceri H., Olson M.E., Stremick C., Read R.R., Morck D., Buret A. The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37:1771-1776.
12. Davies D. Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2:114-122.
13. Donlan R.M., Costerton J.W. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15:167-193.
14. Fux C.A., Wilson S., Stoodley P. Detachment characteristics and oxacillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm emboli in an in vitro catheter infection model. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186:4486-4491.
15. Goeres D., Loetterle L., Hamilton M., Murga R., Kirby D., Donlan R. Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms. Microbiology 2005, 151:757-762.
16. Goeres D.M., Hamilton M.A., Beck N.A., Buckingham-Meyer K., Hilyard J.D., Loetterle L.R., Lorenz L.A., Walker D.K., Stewart P.S. A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4(5):783-788.
17. Hamilton M.A., Buckingham-Meyer K., Goeres D.M. Checking the validity of the harvesting and disaggregating steps in laboratory tests of surface disinfectants. JAOAC 2009, 92:1755-1762.
18. Hamilton M., Hamilton G., Goeres D., Parker A. Guidelines for the statistical analysis of a collaborative study of a laboratory method for testing disinfectant product performance. JAOAC 2013, 96(5).
19. Harrison J., Stremick C., Turner R., Allan N., Olson M., Ceri H. Microtiter susceptibility testing of microbes growing on peg lids: a miniaturized biofilm model for high-throughput screening. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5:1236-1254.
20. Monsen T., Lövgren E., Widerström M., Wallinder L. In vitro effect of ultrasound on bacteria and suggested protocol for sonication and diagnosis of prosthetic infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47(8):2496-2501.
21. Nelson M., LaBudde R., Tomasin S., Pines R. Comparison of 3M PetrifilmTM aerobic count plates to standard plating methodology for use with AOAC antimicrobial efficacy methods 955.14, 955.15, 964.02, and 966.04 as an alternative enumeration procedure: collaborative study. JAOAC 2013, 96(4).
22. Parker A., Hamilton M. Assessing resemblance, repeatability and reproducibility for quantitative methods 2011, Center for Biofilm, Engineering, KSA-SM-10, (http://www.biofilm.montana.edu/content/ksa-sm-10).
23. Parker A., Hamilton M. Using R to assess resemblance, repeatability, and reproducibility for quantitative and semi-quantitative disinfectant methods 2013, Center for Biofilm, Engineering, KSA-SM-13, (http://www.biofilm.montana.edu/content/ksa-sm-13).
24. Parker A., Tomasino S., Hamilton M.A. Statistical model for assessing performance standards for quantitative and semi-quantitative disinfectant test methods. JAOAC 2014, 97(1):58-67.
25. Pinheiro J., Bates D. Mixed Effects Models in S and S-PLUS 2000, Springer.
26. Pinheiro J., Bates D., DebRoy S., Sarkar D., R Development Core Team nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-104 2012.
27. Piyasena P., Mohareb E., McKellar R.C. Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound: a review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 87:207-216.
28. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, (URL http://www.R-project.org/).
29. Richter S.J., Richter C. A method for determining equivalence in industrial applications. Qual. Eng. 2002, 14(3):375-380.
30. Springthorpe S., Sattar S. Carrier tests to assess microbicidal activities of chemical disinfectants for use on medical devices and environmental surfaces. JAOAC 2005, 88(1):182-201.
31. Tomasino S., Parker A., Hamilton M., Hamilton G. Performance of the AOAC use-dilution method with targeted modifications: collaborative study. JAOAC 2012, 95(6):1618-1628.
32. Tomasino S., Parker A., Hamilton M. Use of statistical modeling to reassess the performance standard for the AOAC use-dilution methods (955.15 and 964.02). JAOAC 2014, 97(1):68-77.