메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

A modified approach to grading of evidence

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; STUDY DESIGN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TYPES OF ARTICLE OR STUDY; ANALGESIA; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HEALTH CARE QUALITY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

EID: 84901256376     PISSN: 15333159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (111)

References (41)
  • 2
    • 84866630884 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Integrating guideline development and implemen-tation: Analysis of guideline develop- ment manual instructions for generat- ing implementation advice
    • Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC. Integrating guideline development and implemen-tation: Analysis of guideline develop- ment manual instructions for generat- ing implementation advice. Implement Sci 2012; 7:67.
    • (2012) Implement Sci , vol.7 , pp. 67
    • Gagliardi, A.R.1    Brouwers, M.C.2
  • 6
    • 84901266034 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are the In- stitute of Medicine's Trustworthiness Guidelines trustworthy?
    • Young BK, Greenberg PB. Are the In- stitute of Medicine's Trustworthiness Guidelines trustworthy? R I Med J 2013; 96:13-14.
    • (2013) R I Med J , vol.96 , pp. 13-14
    • Young, B.K.1    Greenberg, P.B.2
  • 9
    • 84901282098 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to use the evidence: Assessment and application of scientific evidence. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra
    • How to use the evidence: Assessment and application of scientific evidence. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, 2000, pp 1-84.
    • (2000) Commonwealth of Australia , pp. 1-84
  • 10
    • 63249115247 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in in- terventional pain management: Part 3: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    • Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, Helm S, Hirsch JA. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in in- terventional pain management: Part 3: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pain Physician 2009; 12:35-72.
    • (2009) Pain Physician , vol.12 , pp. 35-72
    • Manchikanti, L.1    Benyamin, R.M.2    Helm, S.3    Hirsch, J.A.4
  • 11
    • 33144490691 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guide- lines. Report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force
    • Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, Addrizzo-Harris D, Hylek EM, Phillips B, Raskob G, Lewis SZ, Schünemann H. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guide- lines. Report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest 2006; 129:174-181.
    • (2006) Chest , vol.129 , pp. 174-181
    • Guyatt, G.1    Gutterman, D.2    Baumann, M.H.3    Addrizzo-Harris, D.4    Hylek, E.M.5    Phillips, B.6    Raskob, G.7    Lewis, S.Z.8    Schünemann, H.9
  • 12
    • 0035318124 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methods Work Group, Third US Preven- tive Services Task Force. Current meth- ods of the US Preventive Services Task Force
    • Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Lohr KN, Mulrow CD, Teutsch SM, Atkins D; Methods Work Group, Third US Preven- tive Services Task Force. Current meth- ods of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prevent Med 2001; 20:21-35.
    • (2001) Am J Prevent Med , vol.20 , pp. 21-35
    • Harris, R.P.1    Helfand, M.2    Woolf, S.H.3    Lohr, K.N.4    Mulrow, C.D.5    Teutsch, S.M.6    Atkins, D.7
  • 13
    • 84872090637 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to decide whether a clinical prac- tice guideline is trustworthy
    • Ransohoff DF, Pignone M, Sox HC. How to decide whether a clinical prac- tice guideline is trustworthy. JAMA 2013; 309:139-140.
    • (2013) JAMA , vol.309 , pp. 139-140
    • Ransohoff, D.F.1    Pignone, M.2    Sox, H.C.3
  • 14
    • 84872108050 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines: Who watch- es the watchmen?
    • Nagler EV, Ball S. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines: Who watch- es the watchmen? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013; 78:181-182.
    • (2013) Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) , vol.78 , pp. 181-182
    • Nagler, E.V.1    Ball, S.2
  • 16
    • 84893795245 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • GRADE system: Classifica-tion of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation
    • Aguayo-Albasini JL, Flores-Pastor B, So- ria-Aledo V. GRADE system: Classifica-tion of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Cir Esp 2014; 92:82-88.
    • (2014) Cir Esp , vol.92 , pp. 82-88
    • Aguayo-Albasini, J.L.1    Flores-Pastor, B.2    So-Ria-Aledo, V.3
  • 18
    • 84879332852 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why we can't trust clinical guidelines
    • Lenzer J. Why we can't trust clinical guidelines. BMJ 2013; 346:f3830.
    • (2013) BMJ , vol.f3830 , pp. 346
    • Lenzer, J.1
  • 19
    • 84888250856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical practice guidelines: Potential miscon- ceptions of the GRADE approach
    • Watine J, Wils J, Augereau C. Clinical practice guidelines: Potential miscon- ceptions of the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67:7-9.
    • (2014) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.67 , pp. 7-9
    • Watine, J.1    Wils, J.2    Augereau, C.3
  • 20
    • 69749109780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 updated meth- od guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group
    • Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M; Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 updated meth- od guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:1929-1941.
    • (2009) Spine (Phila Pa , vol.1976 , Issue.34 , pp. 1929-1941
    • Furlan, A.D.1    Pennick, V.2    Bombardier, C.3    van Tulder, M.4
  • 21
    • 84901286509 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development of an interventional pain management specif- ic instrument for methodologic quality assessment of nonrandomized studies of interventional techniques
    • Manchikanti L, et al. Development of an interventional pain management specif- ic instrument for methodologic quality assessment of nonrandomized studies of interventional techniques. Pain Physi- cian 2014; 17:E291-E318.
    • (2014) Pain Physi- Cian , vol.17
    • Manchikanti, L.1
  • 22
    • 84901258145 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: De- velopment of IPM specific instrument
    • Manchikanti L, et al. Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: De- velopment of IPM specific instrument. Pain Physician 2014; 17:E263-E290.
    • (2014) Pain Physician , vol.17
    • Manchikanti, L.1
  • 25
    • 84880170882 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving utility of evi-dence synthesis for healthy public pol-icy: The three Rs (relevance, rigor, and readability [and resources])
    • Thomson H. Improving utility of evi-dence synthesis for healthy public pol-icy: The three Rs (relevance, rigor, and readability [and resources]). Am J Public Health 2013; 103:e17-e23.
    • (2013) Am J Public Health , vol.103
    • Thomson, H.1
  • 27
    • 0037938708 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group
    • van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:1290-1299.
    • (2003) Spine (Phila Pa 1976 , vol.28 , pp. 1290-1299
    • van Tulder, M.1    Furlan, A.2    Bombardier, C.3    Bouter, L.4
  • 30
    • 0033194558 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing 'best evi- dence': Issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews
    • Lohr KN, Carey TS. Assessing 'best evi- dence': Issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews. Joint Commission J Qual Improvement 1999; 25:470-479.
    • (1999) Joint Commission J Qual Improvement , vol.25 , pp. 470-479
    • Lohr, K.N.1    Carey, T.S.2
  • 33
    • 0031418242 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized con- trolled trials of the most common in- terventions
    • van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized con- trolled trials of the most common in- terventions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22:2128-2156.
    • (1997) Spine (Phila Pa 1976 , vol.22 , pp. 2128-2156
    • van Tulder, M.W.1    Koes, B.W.2    Bouter, L.M.3
  • 37
    • 0038507118 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stage II - Conducting the re- view, Phase 7 - Data synthesis
    • CRDs guidance for carry- ing out or commissioning reviews. CRD Report Number 4 (2nd), CRD Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK, March
    • Deeks J, Khan KS, Song F, Popay J, Nixon J, Kleijnen J. Stage II - Conducting the re- view, Phase 7 - Data synthesis. In: Under- taking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRDs guidance for carry- ing out or commissioning reviews. CRD Report Number 4 (2nd), CRD Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK, March 2001. www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm
    • Under- Taking Systematic Reviews of Research On Effectiveness , pp. 2001
    • Deeks, J.1    Khan, K.S.2    Song, F.3    Popay, J.4    Nixon, J.5    Kleijnen, J.6
  • 38
    • 30944450549 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Analysing and presenting results. Co- chrane Handbook for Systematic Re- views of Interventions 4.2.6
    • updated September 2006]; Section 8, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK
    • Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (eds). Analysing and presenting results. Co- chrane Handbook for Systematic Re- views of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]; Section 8. In: The Co- chrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK.
    • (2006) The Co- Chrane Library , vol.4
    • Deeks, J.J.1    Higgins, J.P.T.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 40
    • 84871354403 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciatica
    • online comment post- ed March 29
    • Manchikanti L, Falco FJE, Hirsch JA. Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciatica. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157:865-877; online comment post- ed March 29, 2013.
    • (2012) Ann Intern Med , vol.157 , pp. 865-877
    • Manchikanti, L.1    Falco, F.J.E.2    Hirsch, J.A.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.