-
1
-
-
84878237632
-
An update of comprehensive evi- dence-based guidelines for interven- tional techniques of chronic spinal pain. Part I: Introduction and general consid-erations
-
Manchikanti L, Falco FJE, Singh V, Be-Nyamin RM, Racz GB, Helm II S, Cara- way DL, Calodney AK, Snook LT, Smith HS, Gupta S, Ward SP, Grider JS, Hirsch JA. An update of comprehensive evi- dence-based guidelines for interven- tional techniques of chronic spinal pain. Part I: Introduction and general consid-erations. Pain Physician 2013; 16:S1-S48.
-
(2013)
Pain Physician
, vol.16
-
-
Manchikanti, L.1
Falco, F.J.E.2
Singh, V.3
Be-Nyamin, R.M.4
Racz, G.B.5
Helm II, S.6
Cara-Way, D.L.7
Calodney, A.K.8
Snook, L.T.9
Smith, H.S.10
Gupta, S.11
Ward, S.P.12
Grider, J.S.13
Hirsch, J.A.14
-
2
-
-
84866630884
-
Integrating guideline development and implemen-tation: Analysis of guideline develop- ment manual instructions for generat- ing implementation advice
-
Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC. Integrating guideline development and implemen-tation: Analysis of guideline develop- ment manual instructions for generat- ing implementation advice. Implement Sci 2012; 7:67.
-
(2012)
Implement Sci
, vol.7
, pp. 67
-
-
Gagliardi, A.R.1
Brouwers, M.C.2
-
3
-
-
84869857592
-
-
Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
-
Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E (eds); Com- mittee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guide- lines; Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011.
-
(2011)
Com- Mittee On Standards For Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guide- Lines
-
-
Graham, R.1
Mancher, M.2
Wolman, D.M.3
Greenfield, S.4
Steinberg, E.5
-
4
-
-
80052863355
-
-
Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Health Care. Standards for Systematic Reviews. The National Acad- emies Press, Washington, DC
-
Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S (eds); Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research; Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Health Care. Standards for Systematic Reviews. The National Acad- emies Press, Washington, DC, 2011.
-
(2011)
Committee On Standards For Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research
-
-
Eden, J.1
Levit, L.2
Berg, A.3
Morton, S.4
-
5
-
-
2342587438
-
Systematic reviews and me- ta-analyses: An illustrated, step-by-step guide
-
Pai M, McCulloch M, Gorman JD, Pai N, Enanoria W, Kennedy G, Tharyan P, Colford JM. Systematic reviews and me- ta-analyses: An illustrated, step-by-step guide. Natl Med J India 2004; 17:86-95.
-
(2004)
Natl Med J India
, vol.17
, pp. 86-95
-
-
Pai, M.1
McCulloch, M.2
Gorman, J.D.3
Pai, N.4
Enanoria, W.5
Kennedy, G.6
Tharyan, P.7
Colford, J.M.8
-
6
-
-
84901266034
-
Are the In- stitute of Medicine's Trustworthiness Guidelines trustworthy?
-
Young BK, Greenberg PB. Are the In- stitute of Medicine's Trustworthiness Guidelines trustworthy? R I Med J 2013; 96:13-14.
-
(2013)
R I Med J
, vol.96
, pp. 13-14
-
-
Young, B.K.1
Greenberg, P.B.2
-
7
-
-
84901266819
-
Chal- lenges in implementing The Institute of Medicine systematic review standards
-
Chang SM, Bass EB, Berkman N, Carey TS, Kane RL, Lau J, Ratichek S. Chal- lenges in implementing The Institute of Medicine systematic review standards. Syst Rev 2013; 2:69.
-
(2013)
Syst Rev
, vol.2
, pp. 69
-
-
Chang, S.M.1
Bass, E.B.2
Berkman, N.3
Carey, T.S.4
Kane, R.L.5
Lau, J.6
Ratichek, S.7
-
8
-
-
0012689673
-
-
Technology Assess- ment No. 47. AHRQ Publication No. 02- E016. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health- care Research and Quality, 2002
-
West S, King V, Carey TS, Lohr KN, McKoy N, Sutton SF, Lux L. Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence, Evidence Report, Technology Assess- ment No. 47. AHRQ Publication No. 02- E016. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health- care Research and Quality, 2002. www.thecre.com/pdf/ahrq-system-strength.pdf
-
Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence, Evidence Report
-
-
West, S.1
King, V.2
Carey, T.S.3
Lohr, K.N.4
McKoy, N.5
Sutton, S.F.6
Lux, L.7
-
9
-
-
84901282098
-
How to use the evidence: Assessment and application of scientific evidence. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra
-
How to use the evidence: Assessment and application of scientific evidence. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, 2000, pp 1-84.
-
(2000)
Commonwealth of Australia
, pp. 1-84
-
-
-
10
-
-
63249115247
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in in- terventional pain management: Part 3: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized trials
-
Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, Helm S, Hirsch JA. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in in- terventional pain management: Part 3: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pain Physician 2009; 12:35-72.
-
(2009)
Pain Physician
, vol.12
, pp. 35-72
-
-
Manchikanti, L.1
Benyamin, R.M.2
Helm, S.3
Hirsch, J.A.4
-
11
-
-
33144490691
-
Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guide- lines. Report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force
-
Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, Addrizzo-Harris D, Hylek EM, Phillips B, Raskob G, Lewis SZ, Schünemann H. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guide- lines. Report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest 2006; 129:174-181.
-
(2006)
Chest
, vol.129
, pp. 174-181
-
-
Guyatt, G.1
Gutterman, D.2
Baumann, M.H.3
Addrizzo-Harris, D.4
Hylek, E.M.5
Phillips, B.6
Raskob, G.7
Lewis, S.Z.8
Schünemann, H.9
-
12
-
-
0035318124
-
Methods Work Group, Third US Preven- tive Services Task Force. Current meth- ods of the US Preventive Services Task Force
-
Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Lohr KN, Mulrow CD, Teutsch SM, Atkins D; Methods Work Group, Third US Preven- tive Services Task Force. Current meth- ods of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prevent Med 2001; 20:21-35.
-
(2001)
Am J Prevent Med
, vol.20
, pp. 21-35
-
-
Harris, R.P.1
Helfand, M.2
Woolf, S.H.3
Lohr, K.N.4
Mulrow, C.D.5
Teutsch, S.M.6
Atkins, D.7
-
13
-
-
84872090637
-
How to decide whether a clinical prac- tice guideline is trustworthy
-
Ransohoff DF, Pignone M, Sox HC. How to decide whether a clinical prac- tice guideline is trustworthy. JAMA 2013; 309:139-140.
-
(2013)
JAMA
, vol.309
, pp. 139-140
-
-
Ransohoff, D.F.1
Pignone, M.2
Sox, H.C.3
-
14
-
-
84872108050
-
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines: Who watch- es the watchmen?
-
Nagler EV, Ball S. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines: Who watch- es the watchmen? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013; 78:181-182.
-
(2013)
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
, vol.78
, pp. 181-182
-
-
Nagler, E.V.1
Ball, S.2
-
15
-
-
84884576368
-
What guidelines should or should not be: Implications for guideline pro- duction
-
Van Biesen W, van der Veer SN, Jager KJ, Fouque D, Wanner C, Vanholder R. What guidelines should or should not be: Implications for guideline pro- duction. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28:1980-1984.
-
(2013)
Nephrol Dial Transplant
, vol.28
, pp. 1980-1984
-
-
van Biesen, W.1
van der Veer, S.N.2
Jager, K.J.3
Fouque, D.4
Wanner, C.5
Vanholder, R.6
-
16
-
-
84893795245
-
GRADE system: Classifica-tion of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation
-
Aguayo-Albasini JL, Flores-Pastor B, So- ria-Aledo V. GRADE system: Classifica-tion of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Cir Esp 2014; 92:82-88.
-
(2014)
Cir Esp
, vol.92
, pp. 82-88
-
-
Aguayo-Albasini, J.L.1
Flores-Pastor, B.2
So-Ria-Aledo, V.3
-
17
-
-
84881518501
-
Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: A new era is imminent
-
Vandvik PO, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P, Treweek S, Akl EA, Kristiansen A, Fog- Heen A, Agoritsas T, Montori VM, Guyatt G. Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: A new era is imminent. Chest 2013; 144:381-389.
-
(2013)
Chest
, vol.144
, pp. 381-389
-
-
Vandvik, P.O.1
Brandt, L.2
Alonso-Coello, P.3
Treweek, S.4
Akl, E.A.5
Kristiansen, A.6
Fog-Heen, A.7
Agoritsas, T.8
Montori, V.M.9
Guyatt, G.10
-
18
-
-
84879332852
-
Why we can't trust clinical guidelines
-
Lenzer J. Why we can't trust clinical guidelines. BMJ 2013; 346:f3830.
-
(2013)
BMJ
, vol.f3830
, pp. 346
-
-
Lenzer, J.1
-
19
-
-
84888250856
-
Clinical practice guidelines: Potential miscon- ceptions of the GRADE approach
-
Watine J, Wils J, Augereau C. Clinical practice guidelines: Potential miscon- ceptions of the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67:7-9.
-
(2014)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.67
, pp. 7-9
-
-
Watine, J.1
Wils, J.2
Augereau, C.3
-
20
-
-
69749109780
-
Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 updated meth- od guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group
-
Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M; Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 updated meth- od guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:1929-1941.
-
(2009)
Spine (Phila Pa
, vol.1976
, Issue.34
, pp. 1929-1941
-
-
Furlan, A.D.1
Pennick, V.2
Bombardier, C.3
van Tulder, M.4
-
21
-
-
84901286509
-
Development of an interventional pain management specif- ic instrument for methodologic quality assessment of nonrandomized studies of interventional techniques
-
Manchikanti L, et al. Development of an interventional pain management specif- ic instrument for methodologic quality assessment of nonrandomized studies of interventional techniques. Pain Physi- cian 2014; 17:E291-E318.
-
(2014)
Pain Physi- Cian
, vol.17
-
-
Manchikanti, L.1
-
22
-
-
84901258145
-
Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: De- velopment of IPM specific instrument
-
Manchikanti L, et al. Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: De- velopment of IPM specific instrument. Pain Physician 2014; 17:E263-E290.
-
(2014)
Pain Physician
, vol.17
-
-
Manchikanti, L.1
-
24
-
-
0003299863
-
Acute low back problems in adults
-
Guideline No. 14, AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642. Rockville, Maryland. U.S.A., Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Pub-lic Health Service, U.S., Department of Health and Human Services, December
-
Bigos SJ, Boyer OR, Braen GR, Brown K, Deyo R, Haldeman S, Hart JL, Johnson EW, Keller R, Kido D, Liang MH, Nel-Son RM, Nordin M, Owen BD, Pope MH, Schwartz RK, Stewart DH, Susman J, Triano JJ, Tripp LC, Turk DC, Watts C, Weinstein JN. Acute low back problems in adults. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 14, AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642. Rockville, Maryland. U.S.A., Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Pub-lic Health Service, U.S., Department of Health and Human Services, December, 1994; pp 1-60.
-
(1994)
Clinical Practice
, pp. 1-60
-
-
Bigos, S.J.1
Boyer, O.R.2
Braen, G.R.3
Brown, K.4
Deyo, R.5
Haldeman, S.6
Hart, J.L.7
Johnson, E.W.8
Keller, R.9
Kido, D.10
Liang, M.H.11
Nel-Son, R.M.12
Nordin, M.13
Owen, B.D.14
Pope, M.H.15
Schwartz, R.K.16
Stewart, D.H.17
Susman, J.18
Triano, J.J.19
Tripp, L.C.20
Turk, D.C.21
Watts, C.22
Weinstein, J.N.23
more..
-
25
-
-
84880170882
-
Improving utility of evi-dence synthesis for healthy public pol-icy: The three Rs (relevance, rigor, and readability [and resources])
-
Thomson H. Improving utility of evi-dence synthesis for healthy public pol-icy: The three Rs (relevance, rigor, and readability [and resources]). Am J Public Health 2013; 103:e17-e23.
-
(2013)
Am J Public Health
, vol.103
-
-
Thomson, H.1
-
26
-
-
61749085910
-
Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low back pain: An updated Cochrane review
-
Staal JB, de Bie RA, de Vet HC, Hildeb- randt J, Nelemans P. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low back pain: An updated Cochrane review. Spine (Phi- la Pa 1976) 2009; 34:49-59.
-
(2009)
Spine (Phi- La Pa 1976
, vol.34
, pp. 49-59
-
-
Staal, J.B.1
de Bie, R.A.2
de Vet, H.C.3
Hildebrandt, J.4
Nelemans, P.5
-
27
-
-
0037938708
-
Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group
-
van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:1290-1299.
-
(2003)
Spine (Phila Pa 1976
, vol.28
, pp. 1290-1299
-
-
van Tulder, M.1
Furlan, A.2
Bombardier, C.3
Bouter, L.4
-
29
-
-
84878259689
-
An up- date of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques of chronic spinal pain: Part II: Guidance and recommendations
-
Manchikanti L, Abdi S, Atluri S, Benya- min RM, Boswell MV, Buenaventura RM, Bryce DA, Burks PA, Caraway DL, Calodney AK, Cash KA, Christo PJ, Co- hen SP, Colson J, Conn A, Cordner HJ, Coubarous S, Datta S, Deer TR, Diwan SA, Falco FJE, Fellows B, Geffert SC, Grider JS, Gupta S, Hameed H, Hameed M, Hansen H, Helm II S, Janata JW, Justiz R, Kaye AD, Lee M, Manchikanti KN, McManus CD, Onyewu O, Parr AT, Patel VB, Racz GB, Sehgal N, Sharma M, Simopoulos TT, Singh V, Smith HS, Snook LT, Swicegood J, Vallejo R, Ward SP, Wargo BW, Zhu J, Hirsch JA. An up- date of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques of chronic spinal pain: Part II: Guidance and recommendations. Pain Physician 2013; 16:S49-S283.
-
(2013)
Pain Physician
, vol.16
-
-
Manchikanti, L.1
Abdi, S.2
Atluri, S.3
Benya-Min, R.M.4
Boswell, M.V.5
Buenaventura, R.M.6
Bryce, D.A.7
Burks, P.A.8
Caraway, D.L.9
Calodney, A.K.10
Cash, K.A.11
Christo, P.J.12
Co-Hen, S.P.13
Colson, J.14
Conn, A.15
Cordner, H.J.16
Coubarous, S.17
Datta, S.18
Deer, T.R.19
Diwan, S.A.20
Falco, F.J.E.21
Fellows, B.22
Geffert, S.C.23
Grider, J.S.24
Gupta, S.25
Hameed, H.26
Hameed, M.27
Hansen, H.28
Helm II, S.29
Janata, J.W.30
Justiz, R.31
Kaye, A.D.32
Lee, M.33
Manchikanti, K.N.34
McManus, C.D.35
Onyewu, O.36
Parr, A.T.37
Patel, V.B.38
Racz, G.B.39
Sehgal, N.40
Sharma, M.41
Simopoulos, T.T.42
Singh, V.43
Smith, H.S.44
Snook, L.T.45
Swicegood, J.46
Vallejo, R.47
Ward, S.P.48
Wargo, B.W.49
Zhu, J.50
Hirsch, J.A.51
more..
-
30
-
-
0033194558
-
Assessing 'best evi- dence': Issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews
-
Lohr KN, Carey TS. Assessing 'best evi- dence': Issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews. Joint Commission J Qual Improvement 1999; 25:470-479.
-
(1999)
Joint Commission J Qual Improvement
, vol.25
, pp. 470-479
-
-
Lohr, K.N.1
Carey, T.S.2
-
33
-
-
0031418242
-
Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized con- trolled trials of the most common in- terventions
-
van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized con- trolled trials of the most common in- terventions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22:2128-2156.
-
(1997)
Spine (Phila Pa 1976
, vol.22
, pp. 2128-2156
-
-
van Tulder, M.W.1
Koes, B.W.2
Bouter, L.M.3
-
34
-
-
0031760077
-
Grades of recommen- dation for antithrombotic agents
-
Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Eck- man M, Pauker S. Grades of recommen- dation for antithrombotic agents. Chest 1998; 114:441S-444S.
-
(1998)
Chest
, vol.114
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Cook, D.J.2
Sackett, D.L.3
Eck-Man, M.4
Pauker, S.5
-
35
-
-
0028120147
-
Purpose of quality standards for infectious diseases. Infec- tious Diseases Society of America
-
Gross PA, Barrett TL, Dellinger EP, Krause PJ, Martone WJ, McGowan JE Jr, Sweet RL, Wenzel RP. Purpose of quality standards for infectious diseases. Infec- tious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 18:421.
-
(1994)
Clin Infect Dis
, vol.18
, pp. 421
-
-
Gross, P.A.1
Barrett, T.L.2
Dellinger, E.P.3
Krause, P.J.4
Martone, W.J.5
McGowan Jr., J.E.6
Sweet, R.L.7
Wenzel, R.P.8
-
37
-
-
0038507118
-
Stage II - Conducting the re- view, Phase 7 - Data synthesis
-
CRDs guidance for carry- ing out or commissioning reviews. CRD Report Number 4 (2nd), CRD Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK, March
-
Deeks J, Khan KS, Song F, Popay J, Nixon J, Kleijnen J. Stage II - Conducting the re- view, Phase 7 - Data synthesis. In: Under- taking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRDs guidance for carry- ing out or commissioning reviews. CRD Report Number 4 (2nd), CRD Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK, March 2001. www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm
-
Under- Taking Systematic Reviews of Research On Effectiveness
, pp. 2001
-
-
Deeks, J.1
Khan, K.S.2
Song, F.3
Popay, J.4
Nixon, J.5
Kleijnen, J.6
-
38
-
-
30944450549
-
Analysing and presenting results. Co- chrane Handbook for Systematic Re- views of Interventions 4.2.6
-
updated September 2006]; Section 8, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK
-
Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (eds). Analysing and presenting results. Co- chrane Handbook for Systematic Re- views of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]; Section 8. In: The Co- chrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK.
-
(2006)
The Co- Chrane Library
, vol.4
-
-
Deeks, J.J.1
Higgins, J.P.T.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
39
-
-
84871354403
-
Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciat- ica: A systematic review and meta-analy- sis
-
Pinto RZ, Maher CG, Ferreira ML, Han- cock M, Oliveira VC, McLachlan AJ, Koes B, Ferreira PH. Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciat- ica: A systematic review and meta-analy- sis. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157:865-877.
-
(2012)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.157
, pp. 865-877
-
-
Pinto, R.Z.1
Maher, C.G.2
Ferreira, M.L.3
Han-Cock, M.4
Oliveira, V.C.5
McLachlan, A.J.6
Koes, B.7
Ferreira, P.H.8
-
40
-
-
84871354403
-
Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciatica
-
online comment post- ed March 29
-
Manchikanti L, Falco FJE, Hirsch JA. Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciatica. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157:865-877; online comment post- ed March 29, 2013.
-
(2012)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.157
, pp. 865-877
-
-
Manchikanti, L.1
Falco, F.J.E.2
Hirsch, J.A.3
|