Personal Remote Assistance in Ambient Assisted Living-Experimental Research of Elderly People's Trust and Their Intention to Use

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 560-574

  Steinke, Frederick ^a   Ingenhoff, Alexander ^b   Fritsch, Tobias ^c  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

USER INTERFACES;

AMBIENT ASSISTED LIVING (AAL); INTENTION TO USE; MULTIPLE REGRESSIONS; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; REMOTE ASSISTANCE; SUPPORT FUNCTIONS; TABLET COMPUTER; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84901252344     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2014.903789     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 16, 101-128.
2. Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme. (2012). Catalogue of Projects 2012. Retrieved from http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/AALCatalogue2012_V7.pdf
3. ASIMO. (2013). Asimo, the world's most advanced humanoid robot. Retrieved from http://asimo.honda.com/inside-asimo/
4. Becks, T., Dehm, J., & Eberhardt, B. (2007). Ambient Assisted Living. Neue "intelligente" Assistenzsysteme für Prävention, Homecare und Pflege. [New "intelligent" assistant systems for prevention, home care and nursing]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Biomedizinische Technik.
5. Becks, T., Eberhardt, B., Heusinger, S., Pongratz, S., & Stein, J. (2010). Intelligente Heimvernetzung Komfort - Sicherheit - Energieeffizienz - Selbstbestimmung. [Smart home networking comfort - safety - energy efficiency - self-determination]. VDE-Positionspapier. Retrieved from http://www.vde.com/de/Institut/Querschnittstechnologien/IntelligenteHeimvernetzung/Documents/Posipap-Heimvernetzung_Web[1].pdf
6. Bestic. (2013). Bestic Independence, inegrity, dignity & self-confidence. Retrieved from http://www.bestic.se/en/home/
7. Blazescape. (2012). Blazescape. Retrieved from http://www.blazescape.co.uk/facts.php
8. Buck, E., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (1986). Verlässlichkeit und Vertrauenswürdigkeit: Skalen zur Erfassung des Vertrauens in eine konkrete Person. [Reliability and trustworthiness: Scales for the assessment of confidence in a specific person]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 7, 205-223.
9. Chiriac, S., & Rosales, B. (2012). An AAL monitoring system for activity recognition. Results from the first evaluation stages. In R. Wichert & B. Eberhardt (Eds.), Advanced technologies and societal change (pp. 15-28). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
10. Corbin, M. (2003, May). From online help to embedded user assistance. Proceedings at the Society for Technical Communication's 50th Annual Conference, Dallas, TX.
11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
12. Demeris, G., & Hensel, B. K. (2008). Technologies for an aging society: A systematic review of "smart home" applications. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2008, 33-40.
13. Dijkstra, J. J., Liebrand, W. B. G., & Timminga, E. (1998). Persuasiveness of expert systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 17, 155-163.
14. Dulude, L. (2002). Automated telephone answering systems and aging. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21, 171-184.
15. Dunn, D. S. (2009). Research methods for social psychology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
16. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., & Dawe, L. A. (2002). The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors, 44, 79-94.
17. European Ambient Assisted Living Innovation Alliance. (2010). Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
18. Field, A., & Hole, G. (2011). How to design and report experiments, reprinted. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
19. Fraunhofer ISST. (2013). Smart and Independent Living for the Elderly - SMILEY - Projektabschlussbericht. Retrieved from http://www.isst.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/isst/de/documents/Forschungsnews/Fraunhofer-ISST_SMILEY-Schlussbericht_1.1.pdf
20. Georgieff, P. (2008). Ambient Assisted Living. Marktpotentiale IT-unterstützter Pflege für ein selbtsbestimmtes Altern. FAZIT-Schriftenreihe. [Ambient Assisted Living. Market potential of IT-assisted care for independent aging]. Stuttgart, Germany: MFG Stiftung Baden-Württemberg.
21. Ghazizadeh, M., Peng, Y., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2012, October). Augmenting the technology acceptance model with trust: Commercial drivers' attitudes towards monitoring and feedback. Proceedings at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Boston, MA.
22. Giesecke, S., Hull, J., Schmidt, S., Strese, H., Weiß, C., & Baumgarten, D. (2005). AAL - Ambient Assisted Living: Country Report Germany [White Paper].
23. Grayling, T. (2002). If we build it, will they come? A usability test of two browser-based embedded help systems. Technical Communication, 49, 193-209.
24. Hinkelmann, K., & Kempthorne, O. (2007). Design and analysis of experiments, Introduction to experimental design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
25. Ho, G., Wheatley, D. & Scialfa, C. T. (2005). Age differences in trust and reliance of a medication management system. Interacting with Computers, 17, 690-710.
26. Huber, L. L., Shankar, K., Caine, K., Connelly, K., Camp, L. J., Walker, B. A. & Borrero, L. (2013). How in-home technologies mediate caregiving relationships in later life. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 441-455.
27. Information Society Technologies Advisory Group. (1999). Orientations for Workprogramme 2000 and beyond. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/istag-99-final.pdf
28. Ingenhoff, A. (2012). Trust in technology-An experimental comparison of elderly consumers' interpersonal trust with trust in ambient assisted living applications (Master's thesis). Munich, Germany: Technische Universität München.
29. Jian, J. Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4, 53-71.
30. Jonsson, A., & Bergqvist, A. (2013). Dödsbränder i Sverige - Kvalitetsgranskning av MSB: sDödsbrandsdatabas. [Deadly fires in Sweden - Quality review of MSB's Death Brands Database]. Karlstad, Sweden: Karlstads Universitet.
31. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control and allocation of function on humanmachine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
32. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80.
33. Lerch, F. J., Prietula, M. J., & Kulik, C. T. (1997). The turing effect: The nature of trust in expert system advice. Expertise in context: Human and machine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16, 59-72.
35. Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007). Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: an integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 277-301.
36. Masalonis, A. J., & Parasuraman, R. (1999, September). Trust as a construct for evaluation of automated aids: Past and future theory and research. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Houston, TX.
37. McKnight, H. D., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 473-490.
38. Mohammed, M., Bhattacharjee, A., & Kwak, J. (2005). U.S. Patent No. 6,973,482 B2. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
39. Montague, E. N. H., Kleiner, B. M., & Winchester, W. W., III. (2009). Empirically understanding trust in medical technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 628-634.
40. Muir, B. M. (1994). Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37, 1905-1922.
41. Neyedli, H. F., Wang, L., Jamieson, G. A., & Hollands, J. G. (2010). Evaluating reliance on combat identification systems: The role of reliability feedback. In D. H. Andrews, R. P. Herz, & M. B. Wolf (Eds.), Human factors issues in combat identification (pp. 249-265). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
42. Osl, P., Benz, A., & Österle, H. (2010, January). Dienstleistungen für Independent Living: Kundenanforderungen und Optionen für die Angebotsgestaltung. [Services for Independent Living: Customer requirements and options for the supply design]. Proceedings at Ambient assisted living 2010: 3. Deutscher AAL-Kongress mit Ausstellung Assistenzsysteme im Dienste des Menschen - Zuhause und Unterwegs, Berlin, Germany.
43. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
44. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6.
45. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95-112.
46. Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443-452.
47. Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44, 90-103.
48. Schneekloth, U., & Wahl, H.-W. (2005). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen selbständiger Lebensführung in privaten Haushalten (MuG III). Repräsentativbefunde und Vertiefungsstudien zu häuslichen Pflegearrangements, Demenz und professionellen Versorgungsangeboten (pp. 227-240). [Possibilities and limits of independent living in private households (MuG III). Representative findings and in-depth studies on home care arrangements, dementia and professional care services]. München, Germany: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.
49. Sengpiel, M., & Dittberner, D. (2008). The computer literacy scale (CLS) for older adults. development and validation. In M. Herczeg, & M. C. Kindsmüller (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2008: Viel Mehr Interaktion (pp. 7-16). München, Germany: Oldenbourg Verlag.
50. Sengpiel, M. & Wandke, H. (2010). Compensating the effects of age differences in computer literacy on the use of ticket vending machines through minimal video instruction. Occupational Ergonomics, 9(2), 87-98.
51. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). (2011). Im Blickpunkt: Ältere Menschen in Deutschland und der EU. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/
52. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). (2012). Alter im Wandel. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/
53. Steinke, F., Bading, N., Fritsch, T. & Simonsen, S. (2014). Factors influencing trust in Ambient Assisted Living Technology: A scenario-based analysis. Gerontechnology. In press.
54. Steinke, F., Fritsch, T., & Silbermann, L. (2012). Trust in Ambient Assisted Living (AAL)-A systematic review of trust in automation and assistance systems. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 4(3-4), 77-88.
55. Stephanidis C. (2009). Designing for all in ambient intelligence environments: The interplay of user, context, and technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 441-454.
56. Stiftung Warentest. (2002). Rauchmelder: Rechtzeitig aufwachen. [Smoke Detectors: Wake up on time]. Retrieved from http://www.test.de/Rauchmelder-Rechtzeitig-aufwachen-1063379-1063408/
57. Streitz, N. (2010, November). Ambient intelligence research landscapes: Introduction and overview. Proceedings at Ambient Intelligence-First International Joint Conference, Málaga, Spain.
58. Struve, D., & Wandke, H. (2009). Video Modelling for training older adults to use new technologies. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 2, 1-24.
59. Torres-Padrosa, V., Calle, E., Marzo, J. L., & Rovira, M. (2012, January). Towards a mobile, assistive and intuitive videoconferencing. Proceedings at eTELEMED 2012 - The Fourth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, Valencia, Spain.
60. Vogel, M., & Zendler, A. (2009). Lateinische Quadrate und parameterfreie Auswertungsverfahren für die experimentelle Unterrichtsforschung. [Latin squares and parameter-free evaluation method for the experimental research on teaching]. Notes on Educational Informatics-Section A: Concepts and Techniques, 5, 1-12.
61. Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265, 94-104.
62. Wiegmann, D. A., Rich, A., & Zhang, H. (2001). Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2, 352-367.
63. World Health Organization. (2011). Health statistics and health information systems: Definition of an older or elderly person. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/index.html
64. World Health Organization. (2013). Ageing and life course; What is "active ageing"? Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/active_ageing/en/
65. Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 2. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2, 281-304.
66. Zhang, Y., & Ansarai, N. (2010). Wireless telemedicine services over integrated IEEE 802.11/WLAN and IEEE 802.16/WiMAX Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications. Retrieved from http://web.njit.edu/ansari/papers/10WC.pdf
67. Zhou, J., Rau, P.-L. P. & Salvendy, G. (2012). Use and design of handheld computers for older adults: A review and appraisal. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(12), 799-826.
68. Ziefle, M., Himmel, S., & Wilkowska, W. (2011, November). When your living space knows what you do. Acceptance of medical home monitoring by different technologies. Proceedings at Information Quality in e-Health. 7th Conference of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society, Graz, Austria.Click here to enter text.