The relationship between personal knowledge and decision self-efficacy in choosing trial of labor after cesarean

Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 246-253

  Scaffidi, Rose M ^a   Posmontier, Barbara ^b   Bloch, Joan Rosen ^b   Wittmann Price, Ruth ^c  

^a AtlantiCare   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision self efficacy; Elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD); Personal knowledge; Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MATERNAL ATTITUDE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; TRIAL OF LABOR; YOUNG ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; SELF EFFICACY; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84901235258     PISSN: 15269523     EISSN: 15422011     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12173     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Menacker F, Martin JA. BirthStats: rates of cesarean delivery, and unassisted and assisted vaginal delivery, United States, 1996, 2000, and 2006. Birth 2009;36(2):167-167.
2. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107(6):1226-1232.
3. Healthy People 2020. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/default.aspx. Accessed August 2, 2010.
4. Korst LM, Gregory KD, Fridman M, Phelan JP. Nonclinical factors affecting women's access to trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol 2011;38(2):193-216.
5. Farnworth A, Pearson PH. Choosing mode of delivery after previous caesarean birth. Br J Midwifery 2007;15(4):188-194.
6. Renner RM, Eden KB, Osterweil P, Chan BK, Guise JM. Informational factors influencing patient's childbirth preferences after prior cesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196(5):e14-e16.
7. Ridley R, Davis P, Bright J, Sinclair D. What influences a woman to choose vaginal birth after cesarean? JOGNN 2002;31(6):665-672.
8. Macdorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: Epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clin Perinatol 2008;35(2):293-307.
9. Podulka J, Stranges E, Steiner C. (AHRQ). Hospitalizations Related to Childbirth, 2008. HCUP Statistical Brief #110. April 2011. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.hcup-us.arhq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb110.pdf.
10. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WAJr, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335(10):689-695.
11. Cheng YW, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L, Caughey AB, Guise JM. Delivery after prior cesarean: Maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perinatol 2011;38(2):297-309.
12. Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: Wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches. Semin Perinatol 2006;30(5):305-308.
13. Grobman WA, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, Spong, CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110(6):1249-1255.
14. National Institutes of Health. NIH Consensus Development Conference: Vaginal birth after cesarean, new insights. Consensus Development Conference Statement. Bethesda, MD: NIH; 2010. Available at: http://consensus.nih.gov/2010/images/vbac/vbac_statement.pdf.htmz. Accessed July 22, 2013.
15. Fraenkel L, McGraw S. Participation in medical decision making: The patients' perspective. Med Decis Making 2007;27(5):533-538.
16. Cox B. Hot topic. Women's perceptions of their access to, and value of, information as part of their decision making on mode of birth following a previous caesarean section delivery. MIDIRS 2007;17(2):159-168.
17. Emmett CL, Murphy DJ, Patel RR, Fahey T, Jones C, Ricketts IW, et al. Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: Development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids. Health Expect 2007;10(2):161-172.
18. Moffat M, Bell J, Porter M, Lawton S, Hundley V, Danielian P, et al. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG 2001;114(1):86-93.
19. Wittmann-Price, RA, Fliszar R, Bhattacharya A. Elective Cesarean births: Are women making emancipated decisions? Appl Nurs Res 2011;24(3):147-152.
20. Farnworth A, Robson SC, Thomson RG, Watson DB, Murtagh MJ. Decision support for women choosing mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: A developmental study. Patient Educ Couns 2008;71(1):116-124.
21. Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Understanding risk, patient and provider preferences, and obstetrical decision making: Approach to delivery after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:331-336.
22. Eden KB, Hashima JN, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Guise, JM. Childbirth preferences after Cesarean birth: A review of the evidence. Birth 2004;31:49-60.
23. Dilks F, Beal J. Role of self-efficacy in birth choice. J Perinat Neonat Nurs 1997;11(1):1-9.
24. O'Connor AM. User manual-decision self-efficacy scale. Available at: http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decision_Decision self-efficacy.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2011.
25. Bandura A, Adams NE. Analysis of decision self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognit Ther Res 1977;1(4): 287-310.
26. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84(2):191-215.
27. Maibach E, Murphy DA. Self-efficacy in health promotion research and practice: conceptualization and measurement. Health Educ Res 1995;10(1):37-50.
28. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:450-463.
29. Montgomery AA, Emmett CL, Fahey T, et al. Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007;334(7607):1305-1309.
30. Shorten A, Shorten B, Keogh J, West S, Morris J. Making choices for childbirth: A randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Birth 2005; 32(4): 253-262.
31. Fraser W, Maunsell E, Hodnett E, Moutquin JM. Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal vaginal birth after cesarean section education and support program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176(2): 419-425.
32. Horey D, Kealy M, Davey MA, Small R, Crowther CA. Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(7):CD010041. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD10041.pub2.
33. McGrath P, Ray-Baruel G. The easy option? Australian findings on mothers' perception of elective caesarean as a birth choice after a prior caesarean section. Int J Nurs Pract 2009;15(4):271-279.