On the importance of blind testing in archaeological science: The example from lithic functional studies

Journal of Archaeological Science

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 5-14

  Evans, Adrian Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blind tests; Functional analysis; Lithic microwear; Method improvement; Quantification

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; LITHIC FRAGMENT;

EID: 84901216636     PISSN: 03054403     EISSN: 10959238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Akoshima K. Microflaking quantification. The Human Uses of Flint and Chert: Papers Presented at the Fourth International Flint Symposium 1987, 71-80. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G.D.G. Sieveking, M.H. Newcomer (Eds.).
2. Anderson P.C., Georges J.M., Vargiolu R., Zahouani H. Insights from a tribological analysis of the tribulum. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2006, 33:1559-1568.
3. Astruc L., Vargiolu R., Zahouani H. Wear assessments of prehistoric instruments. Wear 2003, 255:341-347.
4. Bamforth D.B. Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests: the institute results in context. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1988, 15:11-23.
5. Bamforth D.B., Burns G.R., Woodman C. Ambiguous use traces and blind test results: new data. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1990, 17:413-430.
6. Bird C., Minichillo T., Marean C.W. Edge damage distribution at the assemblage level on Middle Stone Age lithics: an image-based GIS approach. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2007, 34:771-780.
7. Blumenschine R.J., Marean C.W., Capaldo S.D. Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1996, 23:493-507.
8. Crowther A., Haslam M. Blind tests in microscopic residue analysis: comments on Wadley etal. (2004). J.Archaeol. Sci. 2007, 34:997-1000.
9. Cuzange M.-T., Delque-Kolic E., Goslar T., Grootes P.M., Higham T., Kaltnecker E., Nadeau M.-J., Oberlin C., Paterne M., van der Plicht J., Ramsey C.B., Valladas H., Clottes J., Geneste J.-M. Radiocarbon intercomparison program for Chauvet Cave. Radiocarbon 2007, 49:339-347.
10. Donnelly S.M., Hens S.M., Rogers N.L., Schneider K.L. Technical note: a blind test of mandibular ramus flexure as a morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1998, 107:363-366.
11. Dumont J. The quantification of microwear traces: a new use for interferometry. World Archaeol. 1982, 14:206-217.
12. Evans A.A., Donahue R.E. The elemental chemistry of microwear traces: an experiment. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2005, 32:1733-1740.
13. Evans A.A., Donahue R.E. Laser scanning confocal microscopy: a potential technique for the study of lithic microwear. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2008, 35:2223-2230.
14. Evans A.A., Macdonald D. Using metrology in early prehistoric stone tool research: further work and a brief instrument comparison. Scanning 2011, 33:294-303.
15. Gendel P.A., Pirnay L. Microwear analysis of experimental stone tools: further test results. Stud. Praehist. Belg. 1982, 2:251-265.
16. Gobalet K.W. Acritique of faunal analysis: inconsistency among experts in blind tests. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2001, 28:377-386.
17. Gonzalez-Urquijo J.E., Ibanez-Estevez J.J. The quantification of use-wear polish using image analysis. First results. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2003, 30:481-489.
18. Goodale N., Otis H., Andrefsky W., Kuijt I., Finlayson B., Bart K. Sickle blade life-history and the transition to agriculture: an early Neolithic case study from Southwest Asia. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2010, 37:1192-1201.
19. Grace R., Graham I.D.G., Newcomer M.H. The quantification of microwear polishes. World Archaeol. 1985, 17:112-120.
20. Gurfinkel D.M., Franklin U.M. Astudy of the feasibility of detecting blood residue on artifacts. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1988, 15:83-97.
21. Hardy B.L., Garufi G.T. Identification of woodworking on stone tools through residue and use-wear analyses: experimental results. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1998, 25:177-184.
22. Hill C.A. Technical note: evaluating mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sex. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2000, 111:573-577.
23. Hurcombe L. Some criticisms and suggestions in response to Newcomer etal (1986). J.Archaeol. Sci. 1988, 15:1-10.
24. Juel Jensen H. Flint Tools Plant Working: Hidden Traces of Stone Age Technology 1994, Aarhus University Press, Denmark.
25. Kato K. Classification of wear mechanisms/models. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. J - J. Eng. Tribol. 2002, 216:349-355.
26. Keeley L.H. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. A Microwear Analysis 1980, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
27. Kimball L.R., Kimball J.F., Allen P.E. Microwear polishes as viewed through the atomic force microscope. Lithic Technol. 1995, 20:6-28.
28. Knutsson K., Hope R. The Application of acetate peels in lithic usewear analysis. Archaeometry 1984, 26:49-61.
29. MacLeod N., Benfield M., Culverhouse P. Time to automate identification. Nature 2010, 467:154-155.
30. Manning A.P. Acautionary note on the use of hemastix and dot-blot assays for the detection and confirmation of archaeological blood residues. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1994, 21:159-162.
31. ® with \EDTA\ in archaeology. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2014, 41:230-241.
32. Monnier G.F., Ladwig J.L., Porter S.T. Swept under the rug: the problem of unacknowledged ambiguity in lithic residue identification. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2012, 39:3284-3300.
33. Moss E.H. Areview of investigating microwear polishes with blind tests. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1987, 14:473-481.
34. Newcomer M.H., Keeley L.H. Testing a method of microwear analysis with experimental flint tools. Lithic Use-wear Analysis 1979, Academic Press, New York. B. Hayden (Ed.).
35. Newcomer M., Grace R., Unger-Hamilton R. Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1986, 13:203-217.
36. Odell G.H., Odell-Vereecken F. Verifying the reliability of lithic use-wear assessments by "Blind Tests": the low power approach. J.Field Archaeol. 1980, 7:87-120.
37. Olaussen D. 'Traceology' then and now. Eur. J. Archaeol. 2005, 8:295-297.
38. Olsen J., Heinerneier J., Bennike P., Krause C., Hornstrup K.M., Thrane H. Characterisation and blind testing of radiocarbon dating of cremated bone. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2008, 35:791-800.
39. Pearsall D.M., Chandler-Ezell K., Chandler-Ezell A. Identifying maize in neotropical sediments and soils using cob phytoliths. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2003, 30:611-627.
40. Rots V., Pirnay L., Pirson P., Baudoux O. Blind tests shed light on possibilities and limitations for identifying stone tool prehension and hafting. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2006, 33:935-952.
41. Scott E.M., Cook G.T., Naysmith P. Areport on Phase 2 of the Fifth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI). Radiocarbon 2010, 52:846-858.
42. Shea J.J. On accuracy and relevance in lithic use-wear analysis. Lithic Technol. 1987, 16:44-50.
43. Shea J. The Behavioral Significance of Levantine Mousterian Industrial Variability (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University 1991, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
44. Shea J.J., Klenck J.D. An experimental investigation of the effects of trampling on the results of lithic microwear analysis. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1993, 20.
45. Šmit Ž., Grime G.W., Petru S., Rajta I. Microdistribution and composition of usewear polish on prehistoric stone tools. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B - Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 1999, 150:565-570.
46. Stemp W.J., Chung S. Discrimination of surface wear on obsidian tools using LSCM and RelA: pilot study results (area-scale analysis of obsidian tool surfaces). Scanning 2011, 33:279-293.
47. Stemp W.J., Stemp M. Documenting stages of polish development on experimental stone tools: surface characterization by fractal geometry using UBM laser profilometry. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2003, 30:287-296.
48. Stevens N.E., Harro D.R., Hicklin A. Practical quantitative lithic use-wear analysis using multiple classifiers. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2010, 37:2671-2678.
49. Tringham R., Cooper G., Odell G., Voytek B., Whitman A. Experimentation in the formation of edge damage: a new approach to lithic analysis. J.Field Archaeol. 1974, 1:171-196.
50. Unrath G., Owen L., van Gijn A., Moss E.H., Plisson H., Vaughan P. An evaluation of microwear studies: a multi-analyst approach. Technical Aspects of Microwear Studies on Stone Tools. Early Man News 9/10/11 1986, 51-68. L. Owen, G. Unrath (Eds.).
51. van den Dries M.H. Archaeology and the Application of Artificial Intelligence 1998, Leiden University, Leiden.
52. van Gijn A. Flint in Focus: The Meaning of Flint in the Neolithic and Bronze Age 2009, Sidestone Press.
53. Vaughan P.C. Lithic Microwear Experimentation and the Functional Analysis of a Lower Magdalenian Stone Tool Assemblage 1981, (PhD thesis), University of Pennsylvania.
54. Vaughan P. Use-wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools 1985, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
55. Vila A., Gallart F. Caracterización de los micropulidos de uso: ejemplo de aplicación del análisis de imágenes digitalizadas. Traces et fonction: les gestes retrovés 1993, vol. 50:459-465. ERAUL, Belgium.
56. Wadley L., Lombard M., Williamson B. The first residue analysis blind tests: results and lessons learnt. J.Archaeol. Sci. 2004, 31:1491-1501.
57. Wilkins J., Schoville B.J., Brown K.S., Chazan M. Evidence for early hafted hunting technology. Science 2012, 338:942-946.
58. Yamei H. Experimental studies of microwear analysis on stone artifacts. Acta Anthropol. Sin. 1992, 11:202-215.
59. Young D., Bamforth D.B. On the macroscopic identification of used flakes. Am. Antiq. 1990, 55:403-409.