메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 377-386

A critique of faunal analysis; Inconsistency among experts in blind tests

Author keywords

Critique; Faunal analysis; Faunal experts; Fish remains; Reproducibility; Zooarchaeology

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; FISH; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

EID: 0035015359     PISSN: 03054403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.2000.0564     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (93)

References (32)
  • 4
    • 0004936466 scopus 로고
    • Some remarks on the use and presentation of archaeozoological data
    • (1972) Helinium , vol.12 , pp. 139-153
    • Clason, A.T.1
  • 9
    • 0002350942 scopus 로고
    • Identification, classification and zooarchaeology
    • (1992) Circaea , vol.9 , pp. 35-47
    • Driver, J.C.1
  • 12
    • 0000526759 scopus 로고
    • Research on North American Tortoises: A critique with suggestions for the future
    • (R. B. Bury and D. J. Germano, Eds) Washington, D.C.: United States Department of the Interior National Biological Survey, Fish and Wildlife Research publication
    • (1994) Biology of North American Tortoises , vol.13 , pp. 187-204
    • Germano, D.J.1    Bury, R.B.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.