Administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire

BMJ

Volumn 328, Issue 7452, 2004, Pages 1372-

  Boynton, Petra M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PLANNING; POSTAL MAIL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH; REVIEW; TECHNIQUE; WRITING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; WRITING;

EID: 2942672794     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1372     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. Hands-on guide to questionnaire research: selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ 2004; 328: 1312–1315.
2. Wall CR, De Haven MJ, Oeffinger KC. Survey methodology for the uninitiated. J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 21–27.
3. Gillham B. Developing a questionnaire (real world research). London: Continuum, 2000.
4. Brogger J, Bakke P, Eide GE, Gulsvik A. Contribution of follow-up of nonresponders to prevalence and risk estimates: a Norwegian respiratory health survey. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 558–566.
5. Puleo E, Zapka J, White MJ, Mouchawar J, Somkin C, Taplin S. Caffeine, cajoling, and other strategies to maximise clinician survey response rates. Eval Health Prof 2002; 25: 169–184.
6. Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Berlin JA, Asch DA. Randomized trial of $5 versus $10 monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires. Med Care 2002; 40: 834–839.
7. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002; 324: 1183.
8. Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London, New York: Continuum, 1992.
9. Sapsford R. Survey research. London: Sage, 1999.
10. Boynton PM. The research companion: a practical guide for the social and health sciences. London: Taylor and Francis (in press).
11. McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5.
12. Keeter S, Kennamer JD, Ellis JM, Green RG. Does the use of colored paper improve response rates to mail surveys? A multivariate experimental evaluation. J Soc Serv Res 2001; 28: 69–78.
13. Gueguen N, Legoherel P, Jacob C. Solicitation for participation in a survey via email. Effect of live presence and physical attractiveness of the solicitor on response rate. Can J Behav Sci 2003; 35: 84–96.
14. Shannon DM, Bradshaw CC. A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys. J Exp Educ 2002; 70: 179–192.
15. Boynton P.M., Wood GW, Greenhalgh T. Hands-on guide to questionnaire research: reaching beyond the white middle classes. BMJ (in press).
16. Meadows KA, Gardiner E, Greene T, Rogers D, Russell D, Smoljanvic L. Factors affecting general practice patient response rates to postal survey of health status in England: a comparative analysis of three disease groups. J Eval Clin Prac 1998; 4: 243–247.
17. Dallosso HM, Matthews RJ, McGrother CW, Clarke M, Perry SI, Shaw C, et al. An investigation into nonresponse bias in a postal survey on urinary symptoms. BJU Int 2003; 91: 631–636.
18. Howitt D, Cramer D. First steps in research and statistics. London: Routledge, 2000.
19. Richardson JTE. Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. Leicester: BPS Books, 1996.