Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: Differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1201-1207

  Lingard, Elizabeth A ^a   Sledge, Clement B ^b   Learmonth, Ian D ^c  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIOECONOMICS; SURGICAL PATIENT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33744802614     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00147     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Petersson IF. Occurrence of osteoarthritis of the peripheral joints in European populations. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;55:659-61.
2. Harris WH, Sledge CB. Total hip and knee replacement. New Engl J Med. 1990;323:801-7.
3. Liang MH, Cullen KR, Larson E, Thompson MS, Schwartz JA, Fossel AH, Roberts WN, Sledge CB. Cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:937-43.
4. Grissom SP, Dunagan L. Improved satisfaction during inpatient rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:798-803.
5. Jamison RN, Ross MJ, Hoopman P, Griffin F, Levy J, Daly M, Schaffer JL. Assessment of postoperative pain management: patient satisfaction and perceived helpfulness. Clin J Pain. 1997;13:229-36.
6. Uhlmann RF, Inui TS, Carter WB. Patient requests and expectations. Definitions and clinical applications. Med Care. 1984;22:681-5.
7. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1273-9.
8. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Belisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1722-8.
9. Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE, St-Pierre Y, Joseph L, Belisle P, Liang MH, Ferland D, Phillips CB, Mahomed N, Tanzer M, Sledge C, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:3327-30.
10. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2179-86.
11. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:156-63.
12. Bellamy N. WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a user's guide. London, ON; 1995.
13. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-40.
14. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40-66.
15. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247-63.
16. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-83.
17. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1856-64.
18. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. 2nd ed. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1997. p 10-26.
19. Likert R. A technique for the development of attitudinal scales. Arch Psychol. 1932;22:5-53.
20. Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Daltroy L, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Self-administered patient satisfaction scale for joint replacement arthroplasty. Read at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association; 1997 May 31-June 4; Hamilton, ON.
21. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Michel BA, Stucki G. Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:131-8.
22. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC, Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:2635-41.
23. Lingard EA, Bettinson KA, Griffiths ID, McCaskie AW. Determinants of patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty. Presented as a poster exhibit at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 2005 Feb 23-27; Washington, DC. P 427. Poster number P109.
24. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45:384-91.
25. Lingard EA, Berven S, Katz JN; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Management and care of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: variations across different health care settings. Arthritis Care Res. 2000;13:129-36.