Meta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Archives of Medical Science

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 203-212

  Komócsi, András ^a   Aradi, Dániel ^a   Kehl, Dániel ^b   Ungi, Imre ^c   Thury, Attila ^c   Pintér, Tünde ^a   Di Nicolantonio, James J ^d   Tornyos, Adrienn ^a   Vorobcsuk, András ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^d Wegmans Pharmacy   (United States)

Author keywords

Death; ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; Transfemoral; Transradial

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TRANSFEMORAL CORONARY INTERVENTION; TRANSRADIAL CORONARY INTERVENTION;

EID: 84901005120     PISSN: 17341922     EISSN: 18969151     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2014.42570     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, Xie C, Fox KA, Yusuf S. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2006; 114: 774-82. (Pubitemid 44268228)
2. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 349-56. (Pubitemid 38950594)
3. Louvard Y, Kumar S, Lefevre T. Percentage of transradial approach for interventional cardiology in the world and learning the technique. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2009; 58: 327-32.
4. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1: 379-86.
5. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 132-40.
6. Di Mario C, Viceconte N. Radial angioplasty: worthy RIVAL, not undisputed winner. Lancet 2011; 377: 1381-3.
7. Vorobcsuk A, Konyi A, Aradi D, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Systematic overview and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 814-21.
8. Singh PP, Singh M, Khosla N, et al. Safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Coron Artery Dis 2012; 23: 284-93.
9. Joyal D, Bertrand OF, Rinfret S, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ. Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 813-8.
10. Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, et al. Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart 2012; 98: 303-11.
11. Jang JS, Jin HY, Seo JS, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurointervention 2012; 8: 501-10.
12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-9.
13. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell 2009.
14. Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 26-33. (Pubitemid 36528794)
15. Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction: the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 543-9. (Pubitemid 41317627)
16. Chodor P, Kurek T, Kowalczuk A, et al. Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial. Kardiol Pol 2011; 69: 763-71.
17. Chodor P, Krupa H, Kurek T, et al. RADIal versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (RADIAMI): a prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial. Cardiol J 2009; 16: 332-40.
18. Yan ZX, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008; 121: 782-6.
19. Brasselet C, Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, Hamon M, Metz D. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI trial. Heart 2007; 93: 1556-61. (Pubitemid 350205549)
20. Hou L, Wei YD, Li WM, Xu YW. Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction. Saudi Med J 2010; 31: 158-62.
21. Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment eevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2490-9.
22. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2481-9.
23. Gan L, Li Q, Liu R. Effectiveness and feasibility of transradial approaches for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Nanjing Med Univ 2009; 23: 270-4.
24. Vazquez-Rodriguez JM, Baz-Alonso J, Calvino-Santos R, et al. Radial vs. femoral arterial access in emergent coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49 (9, Suppl 2): 12B.
25. Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 1022-31.
26. Amoroso G, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F. Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2007; 8: 230-7. (Pubitemid 46586660)
27. Bertrand OF, Belisle P, Joyal D, et al. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2012; 163: 632-48.
28. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart 2008; 94: 1019-25. (Pubitemid 352039884)
29. Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2490-9.
30. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1409-20.
31. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569-619.