An improved SWOT evidential reasoning based approach for strategy evaluation under uncertainty

Decision Science Letters

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 73-84

  Ramooshjan, K ^a   Sobhanallahi, M A ^a   Khamseh, Alireza Arshadi ^a  

^a KHARAZMI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Evidential reasoning approach; Richard rumelt criteria; Strategic management; SWOT approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900989987     PISSN: 19295804     EISSN: 19295812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2013.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Amin, S. H., Razmi, J., & Zhang, G. (2011). Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 334-342.
2. Chang, H. H., & Huang, W. C. (2006). Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 43(1), 158-169.
3. Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., & Gary Poon, K. K. (2009). An evidential reasoning based approach for quality function deployment under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5684-5694.
4. Cochrane J. L., & Zeleny M. (1973). Multiple criteria decision making. University of South Carolina Pr.
5. Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., & Gary Poon, K. K. (2009). An evidential reasoning based approach for quality function deployment under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5684-5694.
6. David F. R. (1995). Concepts of strategic management. Prentice Hall.
7. Glueck, W.F. (1980). The evaluation of business strategy. business policy and strategic management (New York Mc Grew-Hill, 359-367.
8. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives. 1976.John Wiley&Sons, New York.
9. Khorshid, S., & Ranjbar, R. (2009). Strategy analytic formulation and selection strategy based SWOT and MCDM method. Industrial Management Journal of Sanandaj Azad University, 12
10. Kurttila M., Pesonen M., Kangas J., & Kajanus M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis-a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41-52.
11. Lee, S., & Walsh, P. (2011). SWOT and AHP hybrid model for sport marketing outsourcing using a case of intercollegiate sport. Sport Management Review,14(4), 361-369.
12. Massahi, M.K., Mirzazadeh, A., & Mirzadeh, A.P. (2012). The Evidential Reasoning Approach for Suppliers Prioritization with Group-AHP Weights. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Istanbul, Turkey.
13. Mirzazade, A., & Rahgann, S. (2012). A new method in the location problem using fuzzy evidential reasoning. Engineering and Technology, 4(22), 4636-4645.
14. Rumelt, R. P. (1998). Evaluating business strategy. Mintzberg H, Quinn JB, Ghoshal S., The Strategy Process, Revised Edition, Prentice Hall Europe.
15. Shafer G.A. (1976). Mathematical theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press ISBN 0-691-08175-1.
16. Siow, C. H. (2001). A new modeling framework for organizational self-assessment: development and application. Quality Management Journal, 8(4), 34-47.
17. Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2006). Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(3), 1885-1913.
18. Xu, D. L., Yang, J. B., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(3), 1914-1943.
19. Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2002). On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 32(3), 289-304.
20. Yüksel, I., & Dagdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis-A case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences,177(16), 3364-3382.