Authority and cooperation between humans and machines

The Handbook of Human-Machine Interaction: A Human-Centered Design Approach

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 207-234

  Millot, Patrick ^a   Debernard, Serge ^a   Vanderhaegen, Frédéric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE VALENCIENNES   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900905218     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Amalberti, R. (1996). La conduite des systèmes à risques. Paris, Puf.
2. Barr, S.H., Sharda, R. (1997). Effectiveness of decision support systems: development or reliance effect? Decision Support Systems, 21, October 2, pp. 133-146.
3. Billings, C.E. (1992). Human-centered aircraf automation: A concept and guidelines (naSa Techn. mem. 103885). naSa-ames research center.
4. Boy, G. (1999). Human-computer interaction in aeronautics: a cognitive engineering perspective. AirandSpace Europe, 1, 1, January, pp. 33-37(5).
5. Carlier, X., Hoc, J.M. (1999). role of a common frame of reference in cognitive cooperation: sharing tasks in Air-Trafc-Control. CSAPC'99. Villeneuve d'Ascq, France, September.
6. Dearden, A., Harrison, M., Wright, P. (2000). Allocation of function: scenarios, context and the economics of efort. Int. J. of Human Computers Studies, 52, 2, february, pp. 289-318.
7. Decortis, F., Pavard, B. (1994) Communication et coopération: de la théorie des actes de langage à l'approche ethnométhodologique. in Pavard, b. (ed.), Systèmes Coopératifs de la modélization à la conception. Toulouse, france, octarès.
8. Debernard, S., Vanderhaegen, F., Millot, P. (1992). An experimental investigation of dynamic task allocation between air traffic controller and AI system. 5th ifac/ifiP/iforS/iea Symposium on analysis, design and evaluation of man-machine Systems. The hague, the netherlands. June 9-11, 1992.
9. Debernard, S., Hoc, J.-M. (2001). Designing dynamic human-machine Task allocation in air Traffic Control: Lessons Drawn From a Multidisciplinary Collaboration. In M.J. Smith, G. Salvendy, d. harris, r. koubek (eds.), Usability evaluation and Interface design: Cognitive Engineering, Intelligent Agents and Virtual Reality, volume 1. London: Lawrence Erlbaum associate Publishers, pp. 1440-1444.
10. Debernard, S., Cathelain, S., Crevits, I., and Poulain, T. (2002). AMANDA Project: delegation of tasks in the air trafc control domain. in m. blay-fornarino, a.-m. Pinna-dery, k. Schmidt, P. Zaraté (eds.), Cooperative Systems design. pp. 173-190. ioS Press. (cooP'2002).
11. Fadier, E. (1990). Fiabilité humaine: méthodes d'analyse et domaines d'application. in J. Leplat et G. de Terssac (eds.), Les Facteurs humains de la fabilité dans les systèmes complexes. Edition soctarès, marseille (1990).
12. Fadier, E., Actigny, B. (1994). Etat de l'art dans le domaine de la fabilité humaine. Ouvrage collectif sous la direction de e. fadier, octarès, Paris.
13. Goetl, B. (1991). Atention, Workload, and Automation. naTo aSi series. vol. f73. automation and Systems Issues in Air Trafc Control. pp. 293-297.
14. Grote, G., Weik, S., Wäfer, T., Zölch, M. (1995). Criteria for the complementarity allocation of functions in automated work systems and their use in simultaneous engineering projects. Int. Journal. of Industrial Ergonomics, 16, october 4-6, pp. 367-382.
15. Grislin, E., Millot, P. (1999). Specifying artifcial cooperative agents through a synthesis of several models of cooperation. Seventh European conference on cognitive Science approaches to Process control, Villeneuve d'ascq, 21-24 September 1999, france, pp. 73-78.
16. Guiost, B, Debernard, S., Millot, P. (2003). Defnition of a Common Work Space. In 10th international conference of human-computer interaction, crete, Greece, January 442-446.
17. Guiost, B., Debernard, S., Poulain, T., Millot, P. (2003). Evaluation of human-human Cooperation to design a support tool for Air-Traffic Controller. 22nd European Conference on human decision-making and manual control, Proceedings of eam 2003, university of Linköping, Swedish, June 2-4, 2003 (pp. 167-174).
18. Guiost, B., Debernard, S., Poulain, T., Millot, P. (2004). Evaluation of a new aTc support system based on human machine task delegation. ifac-hmS 2004, atlanta, Ga-uS, September, 7-9.
19. Hoc, J.M. (1996) Supervision et contrôle de processus: la cognition en situation dynamique. Presse Universitaire de Grenoble, Collection Sciences and Technologie de la connaissance.
20. Hollnagel, E. (1999). Cognitive Reliability and Errors Analysis Method: CREAM. elsevier, amsterdam.
21. Hollnagel, E. (2003). Prolegomenon To cognitive Task design. Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, erik hollnagel (ed.), Lawrence erlbaum associates, Publishers, London, 2003, pp. 3-15.
22. Inagaki, T. (2006). Design of human-machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation. Cognition, Technology and Work, 8, 3, pp. 161-167, iSSn:1435-5558.
23. Jouglet, D., Millot, P. (2001). Performance improvement of Technical diagnosis provided by human-machine cooperation. ifac human-machine Systems: analysis design and evaluation of human-machine Systems, kassel, Germany, September.
24. Lemoigne, J.L. (1984). La théorie du système général, théorie de la modélization. Puf, Paris (re-edited 1994).
25. Lemoine, M.-P, Debernard, S., Crévits, I., Millot, P. (1996) Cooperation between humans and machines: first results of an experimentation of a multilevel cooperative organization in air traffic control. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The journal of Collaborative Computing, 5, 2-3, pp. 299-321.
26. Lind, M. (1990). Representing Goals and functions of complex Systems: an introduction to multilevel flow modeling, Technical report 90-d-381 Tu denmark.
27. Lind, M. (2003). Making sense of the abstraction hierarchy in the power plant domain. Cognition Technology and Work, 5, 2, 67-81.
28. Millot, P. (1998). Concepts and limits for human-machine cooperation, ieee Smc ceSa'98 conference, hammamet, Tunisia, april.
29. Millot, P., Lemoine, M.P. (1998). An atempt for generic concept toward human-machine cooperation. Paper Presented at ieee Smc'98. San diego, uS.
30. Millot, P. (2003). Supervision et coopération homme-machine: approche système. in G. boy (ed.) Ingénierie Cognitive IHM et Cognition, chapitre 6, pp. 191-221, Paris hermés.
31. Millot, P., Debernard, S. (2007). An Atempt for conceptual framework for Human-Machine cooperation. ifac/ifiP/iforS/iea conference analysis design and evaluation of human-machine Systems Seoul korea, September.
32. Millot, P., Hoc, J.M. (1997). Human-machine cooperation: metaphor or possible reality? European conference on cognitive Sciences, eccS'97, manchester uk, april.
33. Millot, P. (1999). Systèmes homme-machine et automatique. Journées doctorales d'automatique Jda'99, conférence Plénière, nancy, septembre.
34. Millot, P., Taborin, V., Kamoun, A. (1989). Two approaches for man-computer cooperation in supervisory Tasks. 4th ifac congress on analysis design and evaluation of man-machine Systems, Xian china, September.
35. Moray, N., Hiskes, D., Lee, J., and Muir, B. (1995). Trust and human intervention in automated Systems. in hoc, cacciabue, hollnagel (eds.), Expertise and Technology cognition and Human Computer Interaction. Lawrence erlbaum Publ.
36. Muir, B.M. (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, pp. 527-539. academic Press.
37. Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Debernard, S. (2002). Common work space for human-machine cooperation in air traffic control. Control Engineering Practice, 10, 571-576.
38. Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Debernard, S., Crévits, I., Millot, P. (1996). Cooperation between humans and machines: frst results of an experimentation of a multilevel cooperative organization in air traffic control. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5, pp. 299-321.
39. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D. (2000). A model for Types and Levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, 30, 3 (may), pp. 286-297.
40. Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., Wieringa, P.A. (2002). Theory of Safety-related violations of a System barriers, Cognition Technology and Work, 4, 171-179.
41. Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., Amalberti, R. (2003). Modeling border-line tolerated conditions of use (bTcus) and associated risks. Safety Science, 41, 111-136.
42. Rajaonah, B. (2006). Rôle de la confance de l'opérateur dans son interaction avec une machine autonome sur la coopération homme-machine. Thèse de doctorat de l'université Paris 8. 27 février 2006.
43. Rajaonah, B., Tricot, N., Anceaux, F., Millot, P. (2008). Role of intervening variables in driver-acc cooperation, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 66, 185-197.
44. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules and knowledge: signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models: IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Smc, 3.
45. Rasmussen, J. (1985). The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision-making and system management. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Smc-15, 2.
46. Rasmussen, J. (1991). Modeling distributed decision-making. in rasmussen J., brehmer b., and Leplat J. (eds.), Distributed decision-making: cognitive models for cooperative work, pp. 111-142, John Willey and Sons, chichester, uk.
47. Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: a modeling problem. Safety Sciences, 27, 2/3, 183-213.
48. Reason, J. (1986). Intentions, errors and machines: a cognitive science perspective. Aspects of consciousness and awareness, bielefeld, W. Germany, december.
49. Reason, J. (1993). Human error. cambridge university Press. (1990.Version française traduite par J.m. hoc, L'erreur humaine, Puf.)
50. Riera, B., Debernard, S. (2003). Basic cognitive Principles applied to the design of advanced Supervisory Systems for Process control. in Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, erik hollnagel (ed.), London: Lawrence erlbaum associates, Publishers, pp. 255-281.
51. Rome, F., Cabon, P., Favresse, A., Mollard, R., Figarol, S., Hasquenoph, B. (2006). Human factors issues of TcaS: a Simulation Study. International conference on human-computer Interaction in Aeronautics (HCI-Aero 2006), Seatle, Washington, September 20-22.
52. Schmidt, K. (1991). Cooperative work: a conceptual framework. In J. rasmussen, b. brehmer, and J. Leplat (eds.), Distributed decision-making: cognitive models for cooperative work. chichester, uk: John Willey and Sons, pp. 75-110.
53. Sheridan, T.B. (1984). Supervisory control of remote manipulators, Vehicles and dynamic Processes: experiments in command and display aiding. Advances in Man-machine Systems Researches, 1.
54. Sheridan, T.B. (1985). Forty-five years of man-machine Systems: history and Trends. 2nd ifac conference analysis, design and evaluation of man-machine Systems, Varese, September.
55. Sheridan, T.B. (1992). Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. miT Press: cambridge, ma.
56. Van der Vlugt M., Wieringa P.A. (2003). Searching for ways to recover from fxation: proposal for a diferent view-point. Cognitive Science Approach for Process Control CSAPC'03, amsterdam, September.
57. Vanderhaegen, F. (1999). Aprecih: a human unreliability analysis method-application to railway system. Control Engineering Practice, 7, 1395-1403.
58. Vanderhaegen, F. (2001). A non-probabilistic prospective and retrospective human reliability analysis method-application to railway system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 71, pp. 1-13.
59. Vanderhaegen, F., Crévits, I., Debernard, S., Millot, P. (1994). Human-machine cooperation: toward an activity regulation assistance for diferent air trafc control levels. Int. J. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, pp. 65-104 (Salvendy, Smith, oshima (eds.) norwood, nJ: ablex Publishing corporation).
60. Vanderhaegen, F., Jouglet, d., Piechowiak, S. (2004). Human-reliability analysis of cooperative redundancy to support diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 53, pp. 458-464.
61. Villemeur, A. (1988). Sûreté de fonctionnement des systèmes industriels: fabilité, facteur humain, informatization. eyrolles: Paris.