Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer: A lawyer's perspective

Agrobacterium: From Biology to Biotechnology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 699-735

  Nottenburg, Carol ^a   Rodríguez, Carolina Roa ^b  

^a Cougar Patent Law ^*  (United States)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900901304     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-72290-0_20     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. AUTM, Association of University Technology Managers (2005) AUTM U.S. licensing survey: FY 2004. http://www.autm.org/surveys
2. Broothaerts W, Mitchell HJ, Weir B, Kalnes S, Smith, LMA, Yang W, Mayer J, Roa-Rodríguez C, Jefferson RA (2005) Gene transfer to plants by diverse species of bacteria. Nature 433: 629-633
3. CIPR, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002) Implementation of the TRIPS agreement by developing countries. Study paper 7 of the report of the commission on intellectual property rights. http://www.iprcommission.org
4. Dam K (1999) "Intellectual Property and the Academic Enterprise", Chicago Economics Working Paper No. 68 (http://www.ssrn.com, abstract id=1665420)
5. Epstein RA, Kuhlik B (2004) Is there a Biomedical Anticommons? Regulation 27: 54-58, Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=568401
6. EPO, European Patent Office (2003) Usage profiles of patent information among current and potential users. http://www.european-patent-office.org/news/ info/survey2003/index.php
7. Farrand SK, vanBerkum PB, Oger P (2003) Agrobacterium is a definable genus of the family Rhizobiaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 1681-1687
8. Feldman M, Colaianni A, Liu K (2005) Commercializing Cohen-Boyer 1980-1997. DRUID Working Paper No. 05-21, http://www.druid.dk
9. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank et al. 119 S.Ct. 2199 (1999)
10. Heller MA, Eisenberg RS (1998) Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticom-mons in Biomedical Research. Science 280 (5364): 698-701
11. Hill-Rom Co., Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 209 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
12. st Cong., 2d Sess, 1990
13. Jones PBC (2005) Patent challenges to agbiotech technologies in 2004. ISB News Report February 2005
14. Lichtman DG (2006) Patent Holdouts and the Standard-Setting Process. U Chicago Law and Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 292 Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=902646
15. Lichtman D, Baker S, Kraus K (2000) "Strategic disclosure in the patent system", U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 107, (http://www. ssrn.com, abstract id=243414)
16. Madey v. Duke University, 307 F.3d 1351, (Fed. Cir. 2002)
17. Meeks RL (2005) President's FY 2006 budget requests level R&D funding. NSF 05-322 October 2005
18. Mireles MS (2004) An examination of patents, licensing, research tools, and the tragedy of the anticommons in biotechnology innovation. U of Mich J of Law Reform 38: 141-235
19. Monsanto (2005) Bayer CropScience, Max-Planck Society, Monsanto Company resolve Agrobacterium patent dispute. Press release 4 February 2005, http://www.monsanto.com
20. National Institutes of Health, Office of Budget, http://officeofbudget. od.nih.gov
21. NSF (2005) National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics http://www.nsf.gov/statistics.
22. NSF SRS (2004) National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Federal R&D Funding by Budget Function: Fiscal Years 2003-05, NSF 05-303, Project Officer, Ronald L. Meeks (Arlington, VA 2004).
23. Nottenburg C, Pardey PG, Wright BD (2002) Accessing other peoples' technology for non-profit research. Aust J of Agric and Res Econ 48: 389-416
24. Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F.2d 1106 (Ct. Cl. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051 (1978)
25. Plant Genetic Systems N.V. v. DeKalb Genetics Corp. 315 F.3d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
26. Press E, Washburn J (2000) The kept university. The Atl Monthly 285: 39-54
27. Roa-Rodríguez C, Nottenburg C (2003) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants, CAMBIA Patent Lens (http://www.patentlens.net)
28. Roche Products v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., 733 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 856 (1984)
29. Stern S, Murray FE (2005) Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis. NBER Working Paper No. W11465. Available at SSRN:http://sssrn.com/ abstract=755701
30. Wolf S, Zilberman D (2001) Institutional Innovation in Agriculture. Natural Res Mgmt and Policy 19: 1-394 Kluwer Academic Publishers
31. Young JM, Keykendall LD, Martinez-Romero E, Kerr A, Sawada H (2001) A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an amended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizo-bium undicola de Lajudie et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radio-bacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51: 89-103