Outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence at 5 years

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 259, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1126-1131

  Maeda, Yasuko ^a,b   Lundby, Lilli ^a   Buntzen, Steen ^a   Laurberg, Søren ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complication; Fecal incontinence; Long term; Outcome; Predictor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR; IMPLANTATION; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URGE INCONTINENCE; WEXNER SCORE;

DEFECATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBOSACRAL PLEXUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84900837292     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829d3969     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, et al. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1995;346:1124-1127
2. Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen RC, et al. Medium-Term results of permanent sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2002;89: 896-901
3. Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: Results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2010;251:441-449
4. Ratto C, Litta F, Parello A, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation is a valid approach in fecal incontinence due to sphincter lesions when compared to sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:264-272
5. Altomare DF, Ratto C, Ganio E, et al. Long-Term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:11-17
6. Matzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: Long-Term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:636-641
7. George AT, Kalmar K, Panarese A, et al. Long-Term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55: 302-306
8. Lim JT, Hastie IA, Hiscock RJ, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: Long-Term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:969-974
9. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77-97
10. Maeda Y, Lundby L, Buntzen S, et al. Suboptimal outcome following sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2011;98:140-147
11. Blandon RE,Gebhart JB, LightnerDJ, et al. Re-operation rates after permanent sacral nerve stimulation for refractory voiding dysfunction in women. BJU Int. 2008;101:1119-1123
12. Dasgupta R, Wiseman OJ, Kitchen N, et al. Long-Term results of sacral neuromodulation for women with urinary retention. BJU Int. 2004;94: 335-337
13. Datta SN, Chaliha C, Singh A, et al. Sacral neurostimulation for urinary retention: 10-year experience from one UK centre. BJU Int. 2008;101: 192-196
14. Siegel SW, Catanzaro F, Dijkema HE, et al. Long-Term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, and retention. Urology. 2000;56(6 Suppl 1):87-91
15. Sutherland SE, Lavers A, Carlson A, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11-year experience. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:19-28; discussion 36
16. Van Kerrebroeck PE, Van Voskuilen AC, Heesakkers JP, et al. Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: Outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol. 2007;178:2029-2034
17. White WM, Mobley JD, III, Doggweiler R, et al. Incidence and predictors of complications with sacral neuromodulation. Urology. 2009;73:731-735
18. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE, Jr, Borsboom GJ, et al. Internal validation of predictive models: Efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:774-781
19. Harrell FE, Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361-387
20. MaedaY,Norton C, Lundby L, et al. Predictors of the outcome of percutaneous nerve evaluation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1096-1102
21. Lundby L, Møller A, Buntzen S, et al. Relief of fecal incontinence by sacral nerve stimulation linked to focal brain activation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:318-323
22. Giani I, Novelli E, Martina S, et al. The effect of sacral nerve modulation on cerebral evoked potential latency in fecal incontinence and constipation. Ann Surg. 2011;254:90-96
23. Abdel-Halim MR, Crosbie J, Engledow A, et al. Temporary sacral nerve stimulation alters rectal sensory function: A physiological study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1134-1140
24. Griffin KM, Pickering M, O'Herlihy C, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation increases activation of the primary somatosensory cortex by anal canal stimulation in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1160-1169
25. Boyle DJ, Murphy J, GooneratneML, et al. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence. DisColon Rectum. 2011;54:1271-1278
26. Gallas S, Michot F, Faucheron JL, et al. Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: Results of trial stimulation in 200 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:689-696
27. Devroede G, Giese C,Wexner SD, et al. Quality of life ismarkedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18:103-112
28. Duelund-Jakobsen J, Van Wunnik B, Buntzen S, et al. Functional results and patient satisfaction with sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:753-759
29. Gill BC, Swartz MA, Firoozi F, et al. Improved sexual and urinary function in women with sacral nerve stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2011;14:436-443; discussion 443.