The effect of sacral nerve modulation on cerebral evoked potential latency in fecal incontinence and constipation

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 254, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 90-96

  Giani, Iacopo ^a   Novelli, Eugenio ^b   Martina, Stefania ^a   Clerico, Giuseppe ^a   Luc, Alberto Realis ^a   Trompetto, Mario ^a   Malaguti, Silvia ^c   Nicholls, John ^d,e   Ganio, Ezio ^a  

^a Divisione di Chirurgia Generale   (Italy)

^b Clinica San Gaudenzio   (Italy)

^c OSPEDALE NIGUARDA CA GRANDA   (Italy)

^d ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTIPATION; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUDENDAL NERVE; SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONSTIPATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATORS; LUMBOSACRAL PLEXUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME;

EID: 79959517581     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182196ff4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA. Bladder pacemaker: scientific basis and clinical future. Urology. 1982;20:614-619. (Pubitemid 13221227)
2. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, et al. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1995;346:1124-1127.
3. Ganio E, Luc AR, Clerico G, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence: a novel approach for intractable fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:619-629.
4. Matzel K, Kamm MA, Stosser M, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet. 2004;363:1270-1276. (Pubitemid 38496488)
5. Jarrett ME, Mowatt G, Glazener CM, et al. Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg. 2004;91: 1559-1569. (Pubitemid 39619917)
6. Malaguti S, Giardiello G, Lazzeri M, et al. Neurophysiological evidence may predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation. J Urol. 2003;170:2323-2326. (Pubitemid 37413987)
7. Sheldon R, Kiff ES, Clarke A, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation reduces corticoanal excitability in patients with faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1423-1431. (Pubitemid 41546643)
8. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77-97. (Pubitemid 23019450)
9. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:9-16.
10. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1525-1532. (Pubitemid 30007584)
11. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30: 473-483.
12. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, et al. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:681-685. (Pubitemid 26181138)
13. Marquis P, Dubois D, McDermott A, et al. Development and validation of the patient assessment of constipation quality of life questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:540-551. (Pubitemid 40676247)
14. Nuwer MR, Aminoff M, Desmedt J, et al. IFCN recommended standards for short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Report of an IFCN committee. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:6-11. (Pubitemid 24227366)
15. Roberts MM. Neurophysiology in neurourology. Muscle Nerve. 2008;38: 815-836. (Pubitemid 351915316)
16. Salinas Casado J, Vírseda Chamorro M, Samblas García R, et al. Assessment of sensory thresholds of the penile dorsal nerve as screening technique for neurologic lesion in impotence. Arch Esp Urol. 1997;50:173-182.
17. Cavalcanti GA, Bruschini H, Manzano GM, et al. Pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials in normal women. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33: 815-821.
18. Cruccu G, Aminoff MJ, Curio G, et al. Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119: 1705-1719.
19. Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Arduini A, et al. New percutaneous technique of sacral nerve stimulation has high initial success rate: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 2003;43:70-74. (Pubitemid 36134319)
20. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Lobascio P, et al. Factors affecting the outcome of temporary sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. The value of the new tined lead electrode. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13: 198-202.
21. Dudding TC, Parés D, Vaizey CJ, et al. Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:249-256. (Pubitemid 351284677)
22. Matzel KE, Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W. Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Chirurg. 2003;74:26-32. (Pubitemid 38269983)