Anterolateral approach for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 290-295

  Totsugawa, Toshinori ^a   Kuinose, Masahiko ^b   Hiraoka, Arudo ^a   Yoshitaka, Hidenori ^a   Tamura, Kentaro ^a   Sakaguchi, Taichi ^a  

^a THE SAKAKIBARA HEART INSTITUTE OF OKAYAMA   (Japan)

^b TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anterolateral thoracotomy; Aortic valve replacement; MICS; Minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTEROLATERAL THORACOTOMY; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSECTOR; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; KNOT PUSHER; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POLYPROPYLENE SUTURE; SURGICAL APPROACH; THORACOTOMY;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84900813926     PISSN: 18636705     EISSN: 18636713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-013-0352-z     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1599-604. (Pubitemid 350030018)
2. Cohn LH. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: technical considerations and results with the parasternal approach. J Card Surg. 1998;13:302-5. (Pubitemid 29203184)
3. Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1222-6.
4. Plass A, Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, et al. Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1851-6.
5. Totsugawa T, Kuinose M, Ozawa M, Eto K, Yoshitaka H, Tsushima Y. Port-access aortic valve replacement. Circ J. 2008;72:674-5.
6. Hiraoka A, Kuinose M, Chikazawa G, Totsugawa T, Katayama K, Yoshitaka H. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery: comparison of port-access and conventional standard approach. Circ J. 2011;75:1656-60.
7. Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:455-62.
8. Lorusso R, Gelsomino S, Renzulli A. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: an alternative to transcatheter aortic valve implantation? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013;28:158-63.
9. Falk V, Cheng DC, Martin J, et al. Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations (Phila). 2011;6:66-76.