Investigating commercial cellulase performances toward specific biomass recalcitrance factors using reference substrates

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 98, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 4409-4420

  Ju, Xiaohui ^a   Bowden, Mark ^b   Engelhard, Mark ^b   Zhang, Xiao ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulase; Hydrolytic efficiency; Lignin; Nanocrystalline cellulose; PMOs; Reference substrates

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; LIGNIN;

BIOMASS RECALCITRANCES; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE CRYSTALLITES; CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS; DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATION; NANOCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; PMOS; SUBSTRATE CHARACTERISTICS;

SUBSTRATES;

ACCELLERASE 1500; CELLIC CTEC2; CELLULASE; CYTOLASE CL; LIGNIN; NOVOZYME 188; POLYSACCHARIDE MONOOXYGENASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNSPECIFIC MONOOXYGENASE;

BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; INHIBITION; LIGNIN; POLYMERIZATION; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; DECRYSTALLIZATION; DEPOLYMERIZATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME INHIBITION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POLYMERIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METABOLISM;

BIOMASS; CELLULASES; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN;

EID: 84900811488     PISSN: 01757598     EISSN: 14320614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5450-4     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Arantes V, Saddler JN (2010) Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of amorphogenesis. Biotechol Biofuels 3:4
2. ASTM D4243-99, (2009) Standard test method for measurement of average viscometric degree of polymerization of new and aged electrical papers and boards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
3. Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS (2010) Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data from cellulose: a new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates. Bioresour Technol 101:4461-4471
4. Beeson WT, Phillips CM, Cate JHD, Marletta MA (2012) Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by fungal copper-dependent polysaccharide monooxygenases. J Am Chem Soc 134:890-892
5. Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kilburn D, Bura R, Markov A, Skomarovsky A, Okunev O, Gusakov A, Maximenko V, Gregg D, Sinitsyn A, Saddler J (2005a) Evaluation of novel fungal cellulase preparations for ability to hydrolyze softwood substrates - evidence for the role of accessory enzymes. Enzym Microb Technol 37:175-184 (Pubitemid 40703931)
6. Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kurabi A, Bura R, Tu M, Kilburn D, Saddler J (2005b) Weak lignin-binding enzymes: a novel approach to improve activity of cellulases for hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121-124:163-170 (Pubitemid 40691222)
7. Berlin A, Balakshin M, Gilkes N, Kadla J, Maximenko V, Kubo S, Saddler J (2006) Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase, and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. J Biotechnol 125:198-209 (Pubitemid 44188944)
8. Berlin A, Maximenko V, Gilkes N, Saddler J (2007) Optimization of enzyme complexes for lignocellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 97:287-296 (Pubitemid 46852925)
9. Brown EE, Hu DH, Abu Lail N, Zhang X (2013) Potential of nanocrystalline cellulose-fibrin nanocomposites for artificial vascular graft applications. Biomacromolecules 14:1063-1071
10. Browning BL (1967) Methods of wood chemistry. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York
11. Chang VS, Holtzapple MT (2000) Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84-86:5-37 (Pubitemid 30349447)
12. Chen Y, Stipanovic AJ, Winter WT, Wilson DB, Kim YJ (2007) Effect of digestion by pure cellulases on crystallinity and average chain length for bacterial and microcrystalline celluloses. Cellulose 14:283-293 (Pubitemid 47103546)
13. Coughlan MP (1985) The properties of fungal and bacterial cellulases with comment on their production and application. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 3:39-109
14. Dai Z, Aryal UK, Shukla A, Qian W, Smith RD, Magnuson JK, Adney WS, Beckham GT, Brunecky R, Himmel ME, Decker SR, Ju X, Zhang X, Baker SE (2013) Impact of alg3 gene deletion on growth, development, pigment production, protein secretion, and functions of recombinant Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases in Aspergillus niger . Fungal Genet Biol. doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2013.09.004
15. Drissen RET, Maas RHW, Van Der Maarel MJEC, Kabel MA, Schols HA, Tramper J, Beeftink HH (2007) A generic model for glucose production fromvarious cellulose sources by a commercial cellulase complex. Biocatal Biotransform 25:419-429 (Pubitemid 350091041)
16. Fox JM, Levine SE, Clark DS, Blanch HW (2012) Initial- and processivecut products reveal cellobiohydrolase rate limitations and the role of companion enzymes. Biochemistry 51:442-452
17. Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257-268
18. Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (1996) Factors affecting cellulose hydrolysis and the potential of enzyme recycle to enhance the efficiency of an integrated wood to ethanol process. Biotechnol Bioeng 51:375-383 (Pubitemid 26313472)
19. Gupta R, Lee YY (2009) Mechanism of cellulase reaction on pure cellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1570-1581
20. Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, Realff MJ, Bommarius AS (2010) Cellulose crystallinity - a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J 277:1571-1582
21. Hamad WY, Hu TQ (2010) Structure-process-yield interrelations in nanocrystalline cellulose extraction. Can J Chem Eng 88:392-402
22. Harris PV, Welner D, McFarland KC, Re E, Navarro Poulsen JC, Brown K, Salbo R, Ding H, Vlasenko E, Merino S, Xu F, Cherry J, Larsen S, Lo Leggio L (2010) Stimulation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by proteins of glycoside hydrolase family 61: structure and function of a large, enigmatic family. Biochemistry 49:3305-3316
23. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315:804-807
24. Horn SJ, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Eijsink VGH (2012) Novel enzymes for the degradation of cellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:45
25. Johansson LS, Campbell JM, Koljonen K, Stenius P (1999) Evaluation of surface lignin on cellulose fibers with XPS. Appl Surf Sci 144-45:92-95
26. Ju X, Engelhard M, Zhang X (2013a) An advanced understanding of the specific effects of xylan and surface lignin contents on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 132:137-145
27. Ju X, Grego C, Zhang X (2013b) Specific effects of fiber size and fiber swelling on biomass substrate surface area and enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour Technol 144:232-239
28. Kabel MA, van der Maarel MJEC, Klip G, Voragen AGJ, Schols HA (2006) Standard assays do not predict the efficiency of commercial cellulase preparations towards plant materials. Biotechnol Bioeng 93:56-63 (Pubitemid 43118357)
29. Kerff F, Amoroso A, Herman R, Sauvage E, Petrella S, Filee P, Charlier P, Joris B, Tabuchi A, Nikolaidis N, Cosgrove DJ (2008) Crystal structure and activity of Bacillus subtilis YoaJ (EXLX1), a bacterial expansin that promotes root colonization. PNAS 105:16876-16881
30. Klein-Marcuschamer D, Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Simmons BA, Blanch HW (2012) The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:1083-1087
31. Krassig HA (1993) Cellulose, structure, accessibility, and reactivity, vol 11. Gordon and Breach Science publisher, New York
32. Kumar D, Murthy GS (2013) Stochastic molecular model of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose for ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:63
33. Le Bourvellec C, Renard CMGC (2012) Interactions between polyphenols and macromolecules: quantification methods and mechanisms. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 52:213-248
34. Lee SB, Kim IH, Ryu DDY, Taguchi H (1983) Structural-properties of cellulose and cellulase reaction-mechanism. Biotechnol Bioeng 25: 33-51
35. Levine SE, Fox JM, Clark DS, Blanch HW (2011) A mechanistic model for rational design of optimal cellulase mixtures. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:2561-2570
36. Li H, Liu H, Fu SY, Zhan HY (2011) Surface hydrophobicity modification of cellulose fibers by layer-by-layer self-assembly of lignosulfonates. Bioresource 6:1681-1695
37. Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN (1999) Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 15: 804-816 (Pubitemid 29475619)
38. Martinez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B, Saloheimo M, Arvas M, Baker SE, Chapman J, Chertkov O, Coutinho PM, Cullen D, Danchin EGJ, Grigoriev IV, Harris P, Jackson M, Kubicek CP, Han CS, Ho I, Larrondo LF, de Leon AL, Magnuson JK, Merino S, Misra M, Nelson B, Putnam N, Robbertse B, Salamov AA, Schmoll M, Terry A, Thayer N, Westerholm-Parvinen A, Schoch CL, Yao J, Barbote R, Nelson MA, Detter C, Bruce D, Kuske CR, Xie G, Richardson P, Rokhsar DS, Lucas SM, Rubin EM, Dunn-Coleman N, Ward M, Brettin TS (2008) Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina) . Nat Biotechnol 26:553-560 (Pubitemid 351668043)
39. Mcqueenmason S, Cosgrove DJ (1994) Disruption of hydrogen-bonding between plant-cell wall polymers by proteins that induce wall extension. PNAS 91:6574-6578
40. Merino ST, Cherry J (2007) Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. Biofuels 108:95-120 (Pubitemid 47434544)
41. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties, and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941-3994
42. Ozdal T, Capanoglu E, Altay F (2013) A review on protein-phenolic interactions and associated changes. Food Res Int 51:954-970
43. Pan X (2008) Role of functional groups in lignin inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 2: 25-32
44. Pan XJ, Gilkes N, Kadla J, Pye K, Saka S, Gregg D, Ehara K, Xie D, Lam D, Saddler J (2006) Bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol and co-products using an organosolv fractionation process:Optimization of process yields. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:851-861 (Pubitemid 44201937)
45. Pandey A, Selvakumar P, Soccol CR, Nigam P (1999) Solid state fermentation for the production of industrial enzymes. Curr Sci 77: 149-162 (Pubitemid 129558372)
46. Persson I, Tjerneld F, Hahn-Hägerdal B (1991) Fungal cellulolytic enzyme-production - a review. Process Biochem 26:65-74
47. Rosgaard L, Pedersen S, Cherry JR, Harris P, Meyer AS (2006) Efficiency of new fungal cellulase systems in boosting enzymatic degradation of barley straw lignocellulose. Biotechnol Prog 22:493-498
48. Rouxhet PG, Genet MJ (2011) XPS analysis of bio-organic systems. Surf Interface Anal 43:1453-1470
49. Saloheimo M, Paloheimo M, Hakola S, Pere J, Swanson B, Nyyssönen E, Bhatia A, Ward M, Penttilä M (2002) Swollenin, a Trichoderma reesei protein with sequence similarity to the plant expansins, exhibits disruption activity on cellulosic materials. Eur J Biochem 269: 4202-4211 (Pubitemid 35026007)
50. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, Conrad CM (1962) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Tex Res J 29:786-794
51. Seiji N, Richard PC, Jack NS (2001) The influence of lignin on the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass substrates. In: Zhu J, Zhang X, Pan X (eds) Sustainable production of fuels, chemicals, and fibers from forest biomass. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 145-167
52. Sewalt VJH, Glasser WG, Beauchemin KA (1997) Lignin impact on fiber degradation 3. Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by additives. J Agric Food Chem 45:1823-1828 (Pubitemid 127485630)
53. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D (2006) Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples. NREL/TP-510-42623 NREL Laboratory Analytical Procedure. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. www.nrel.gov/biomass/pdfs/ 42623.pdf
54. TAPPI, Peachtree Corners, GA (2007) T204 cm-07 "Solvent extractives of wood and pulp".
55. TAPPI, Peachtree Corners, GA (2009) T249 cm-09 "Carbohydrate composition of extractive-free wood and wood pulp".
56. TAPPI, Peachtree Corners, GA (2011) T222 om-11 "Acid-Insoluble Lignin in Wood and Pulp".
57. TAPPI, Peachtree Corners, GA (2012) T211 om-12 "Ash in Wood, Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard".
58. TAPPI, Peachtree Corners, GA (2013) T236 om-13 "Kappa number of pulp".
59. Tejirian A, Xu F (2011) Inhibition of enzymatic cellulolysis by phenolic compounds. Enzym Microb Technol 48:239-247
60. Tu MB, Chandra RP, Saddler JN (2007) Recycling cellulases during the hydrolysis of steam exploded and ethanol pretreated lodgepole pine. Biotechnol Prog 23:1130-1137 (Pubitemid 47587086)
61. Wyman CE (1999) Biomass ethanol: Technical progress, opportunities, and commercial challenges. Annu Rev Energy Environ 24:189-226
62. Xiao Z, Zhang X, Gregg D, Saddler J (2004) Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and â-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 115:1115-1126 (Pubitemid 40068761)
63. Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B, Ladisch M (2010) Inhibition of cellulases by phenols. Enzym Microb Technol 46:170-176
64. Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B, Ladisch M (2011) Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzym Microb Technol 48:54-60
65. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR (2004) Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:797-824
66. Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR (2006) Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24:452-481 (Pubitemid 44082013)
67. Zhang X, Qin WJ, Paice MG, Saddler JN (2009) High consistency enzymatic hydrolysis of hardwood substrates. Bioresour Technol 100:5890-5897
68. Zifcakova L, Baldrian P (2012) Fungal polysaccharide monooxygenases: new players in the decomposition of cellulose. Fungal Ecol 5:481-489