An integrated multivariable artificial pancreas control system

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 498-507

  Turksoy, Kamuran ^a   Quinn, Lauretta T ^b   Littlejohn, Elizabeth ^c   Cinar, Ali ^a  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive control; Closed loop; Hypoglycemia; Type 1 diabetes

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; INSULIN; ANTIDIABETIC AGENT; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ADULT; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS; ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS CONTROL SYSTEM; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROL SYSTEM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN INFUSION; INTEGRATION; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; ADOLESCENT; ALARM MONITOR; ALGORITHM; BLOOD; CHEMICALLY INDUCED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DRUG EFFECTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TIME FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CLINICAL ALARMS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INSULIN; INSULIN INFUSION SYSTEMS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PANCREAS, ARTIFICIAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900806098     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296814524862     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Steil GM, et al. Feasibility of automating insulin delivery for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006;55(12):3344-3350. (Pubitemid 44923591)
2. Schaller HC, et al. On-line adaptive algorithm with glucose prediction capacity for subcutaneous closed loop control of glucose: evaluation under fasting conditions in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23(1):90-93.
3. Bruttomesso D, et al. Closed-loop artificial pancreas using subcutaneous glucose sensing and insulin delivery and a model predictive control algorithm: preliminary studies in Padova and Montpellier. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(5):1014-1021.
4. Clarke WL, et al. Closed-loop artificial pancreas using subcutaneous glucose sensing and insulin delivery and a model predictive control algorithm: the Virginia experience. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(5):1031-1038.
5. Steil GM, et al. The effect of insulin feedback on closed loop glucose control. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(5):1402-1408.
6. Ruiz JL, et al. Effect of insulin feedback on closed-loop glucose control: a crossover study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(5):1123.
7. El-Khatib FH, et al. A bihormonal closed-loop artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(27):27ra27-27ra27.
8. Russell SJ, et al. Blood glucose control in type 1 diabetes with a bihormonal bionic endocrine pancreas. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(11):2148-2155.
9. Turksoy K, et al. Multivariable adaptive closed-loop control of an artificial pancreas without meal and activity announcement. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(5):386-400.
10. Buckingham B, et al. Prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia using predictive alarm algorithms and insulin pump suspension. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(5):1013-1017.
11. Elleri D, et al. Suspended insulin infusion during overnight closed-loop glucose control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2010;27(4):480-484.
12. Ward WK, Castle JR, El Youssef J. Safe glycemic management during closed-loop treatment of type 1 diabetes: the role of glucagon, use of multiple sensors, and compensation for stress hyperglycemia. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(6):1373-1380.
13. Weinzimer SA, et al. Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery versus semiautomated hybrid control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using an artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(5):934-939.
14. Elleri D, et al. Automated overnight closed-loop glucose control in young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(4):419-424.
15. Elleri D, et al. Closed-loop basal insulin delivery over 36 hours in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):838-844.
16. Breton M, et al. Fully integrated artificial pancreas in type 1 diabetes modular closed-loop glucose control maintains near normoglycemia. Diabetes. 2012;61(9):2230-2237.
17. Westerterp KR, Plasqui G. Physical activity and human energy expenditure. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004;7(6):607-613. (Pubitemid 40340630)
18. Riddell MC, Milliken J. Preventing exercise-induced hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring and a new carbohydrate intake algorithm: an observational field study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(8):819-825.
19. Kelly D, Hamilton JK, Riddell MC. Blood glucose levels and performance in a sports cAMP for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a field study. Int J Pediatr. 2010. Available at: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijpedi/2010/ 216167/.
20. Perala CH, Sterling BS. Galvanic Skin Response as a Measure of Soldier Stress. ARL-TR-4114. Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD Human Research and Engineering Directorate; 2007.
21. Group DR. Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Am J Med. 1991;90(4):450-459.
22. Palerm CC, Bequette BW. Hypoglycemia detection and prediction using continuous glucose monitoring-a study on hypoglycemic clamp data. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1(5):624-629.
23. Palerm CC, et al. Hypoglycemia prediction and detection using optimal estimation. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005;7(1):3-14. (Pubitemid 40354572)
24. Sparacino G, et al. Glucose concentration can be predicted ahead in time from continuous glucose monitoring sensor time-series. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(5):931-937. (Pubitemid 46628560)
25. Eren-Oruklu M, et al. Estimation of future glucose concentrations with subject-specific recursive linear models. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(4):243-253.
26. Turksoy K, et al. Hypoglycemia early alarm systems based on multivariable models. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52(35):12329-12336.
27. Eren-Oruklu M, et al. Adaptive system identification for estimating future glucose concentrations and hypoglycemia alarms. Automatica. 2012;48(8):1892-1897.
28. Bayrak ES, et al. Hypoglycemia early alarm systems based on recursive autoregressive partial least squares models. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;7(1):206-214.
29. Turksoy K, et al. Multivariable adaptive identification and control for artificial pancreas systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014, 61(3):883-891. doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2291777.
30. Andre D, et al. The Development of the SenseWear® Armband, a Revolutionary Energy Assessment Device to Assess Physical Activity and Lifestyle. Pittsburgh, PA: BodyMedia; 2006.
31. Clarke DW, Mohtadi C, Tuffs PS. Generalized predictive control - part I. The basic algorithm. Automatica. 1987;23(2):137-148. (Pubitemid 17600158)
32. Clarke DW, Mohtadi C, Tuffs PS. Generalized predictive control-part ii extensions and interpretations. Automatica. 1987;23(2):149-160. (Pubitemid 17600157)
33. Turksoy K, et al. Adaptive Multivariable Closed-Loop Control of Blood Glucose Concentration in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Washington, DC: American Control Conference; 2013:2905-2910.
34. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Resource Manual for Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2010.
35. Finan DA. Modeling and Monitoring Strategies for Type 1 Diabetes. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest; 2008.