From modeling long-term growth to short-term fluctuations: Differential equation modeling is the language of change

Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics

Volumn 66, Issue , 2013, Pages 427-447

  Deboeck, Pascal R ^a   Nicholson, Jody S ^b   Bergeman, C S ^c   Preacher, Kristopher J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

AS RELATIONSHIPS; COMMON LANGUAGES; COMMON MODELS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION MODEL; INTRAINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; LONG-TERM GROWTHS; SOCIAL SCIENTISTS; STATISTICAL PROBLEMS;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 84900796828     PISSN: 21941009     EISSN: 21941017     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9348-8_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bauer, D. J. (2003). Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 135–167.
2. Bisconti, T. L., Bergeman, C. S., & Boker, S. M. (2006). Social support as a predictor of variability: An examination of the adjustment trajectories of recent widows. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 590–599.
3. Boker, S. M., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2005). Dynamical systems modeling: An application to the regulation of intimacy and disclosure in marriage. In T. A. Walls & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 195–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Boker, S. M., Leibenluft, E., Deboeck, P. R., Virk, G., & Postolache, T. T. (2008). Mood oscillations and coupling between mood and weather in patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, 1(2), 181–202.
5. Boker, S. M., Neale, M. C., & Rausch, J. R. (2004). Latent differential equation modeling with multivariate multi-occasion indicators. In K. V. Montfort, J. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models: Theory and applications (pp. 151–174). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
6. Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(1), 127–160.
7. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.
8. Cudeck, R., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2002). A version of quadratic regression with interpretable parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(4), 501–519.
9. Deboeck, P. R. (2010). Estimating dynamical systems, derivative estimation hints from Sir Ronald A. Fisher. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(4), 725–745.
10. Deboeck, P. R. (2011). Modeling nonlinear dynamics. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), The handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 440–458). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Deboeck, P. R., & Bergeman, C. S. (2013). The reservoir model: A differential equation model of psychological capacity. Psychological Methods, 18(2), 237–256.
12. Deboeck, P. R., & Boker, S. M. (in press). Analysis of dynamic systems: The modeling of change and variability. In S. Henly (Ed.), International handbook of advanced quantitative methods in nursing research. New York: Routledge.
13. Deboeck, P. R., Nicholson, J. S., Kouros, C. D., & Little, T. D. (submitted). Interfacing theory and method: Derivatives as the developmental Rosetta stone. International Journal of Behavioral Development.
14. Deboeck, P. R., & Preacher, K. J. (2013). No need to be discrete: A method for continuous time mediation analysis. Under review.
15. Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58, 80–92.
16. Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1991). Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 243–259). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C., Malarkey, W. B., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1997). Studying multivariate change using multilevel models and latent curve models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 215–253.
18. Montpetit, M. A., Bergeman, C. S., Deboeck, P. R., Tiberio, S. S., & Boker, S. M. (2010). Resilience-as-process: Negative affect, stress, and coupled dynamical systems. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 631–640.
19. Nicholson, J. S., Deboeck, P. R., Farris, J. R., Boker, S. M., & Borkowski, J. G. (2011). Maternal depressive symptomatology and child behavior: A dynamical system with simultaneous bidirectional coupling. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1312–1323.
20. Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika, 65, 199–215.
21. Ram, N. (2011). Analyzing large-scale ema data from a person-specific perspective: Pushing intraindividual variability into a real time world. Presented at the Center for Research Methods and Data Analysis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
22. Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods, 17, 176–192.
23. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegan, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.