Association between response to ovarian stimulation and miscarriage following IVF: An analysis of 124 351 IVF pregnancies

Human Reproduction

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1218-1224

  Sunkara, Sesh Kamal ^a   Khalaf, Yacoub ^a   Maheshwari, Abha ^b   Seed, Paul ^a   Coomarasamy, Arri ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

IVF; Miscarriage; Oocyte quality; Ovarian response

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; FOLLOW UP; GAMETE INTRAFALLOPIAN TRANSFER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OOCYTE; OOCYTE DONATION; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OVARIAN RESERVE; OVARIAN STIMULATION; OVARY FOLLICLE; OVARY FUNCTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; STIMULATION; ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RISK FACTOR; AGE; INFERTILITY;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN RESERVE; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84900790669     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu053     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:2868-2871.
2. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:685-718.
3. De Sutter P, Dhont M. Poor response after hormonal stimulation for in vitro fertilization is not related to ovarian aging. Fertil Steril 2003; 79:1294-1298.
4. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; IESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: The Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011;26: 1616-1624.
5. Griffin DK. The incidence, origin, and etiology of aneuploidy. Int Rev Cytol 1996;167:263-296.
6. Haadsma ML, Groen H, Mooij TM, Burger CW, Broekmans FJ, Lambalk CB, Leeuwen FE, Hoek A, OMEGA Project Group. Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 2010a;20:191-200.
7. Haadsma ML, Mooij TM, Groen H, Burger CW, Lambalk CB, Broekmans FJ, Van Leeuwen FE, Bouman K, Hoek A, OMEGA Project Group. A reduced size of the ovarian follicle pool is associated with an increased risk of a trisomic pregnancy in IVF-Treated women. Hum Reprod 2010b; 25:552-558.
8. Joo BS, Park SH, An BM, Kim KS, Moon SE, Moon HS. Serum oestradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influence the pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization in a concentration dependent manner. Fertil Steril 2010;93:442-446.
9. Levi AJ, Raynault MF, Bergh PA, Drews MR, Miller BT, Scott Jr. R.T. Reproductive outcome in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2001;76:666-669.
10. Mitwally MF, Bhakoo HS, Crickard K, Sullivan MW, Batt RE, Yeh J. Estradiol production during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation correlates with treatment outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2006;86:588-596.
11. Nasseri A, Mukherjee T, Grifo JA, Noyes N, Krey L, Copperman AB. Elevated day 3 serum follicle stimulating hormone and/or estradiol may predict fetal aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 1999;71:715-718.
12. Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, Rasmussen SA. National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod 2009;24:360-366.
13. Setti AS, De Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, De CássiaSavioFigueira R, De Castro Azevedo M, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Are poor responders patients at higher risk for producing aneuploid embryos in vitro? J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28:399-404.
14. Schieve LA, Tatham L, Peterson HB, Toner J, Jeng G. Spontaneous abortion among pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:959-967.
15. Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: An analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1768-1774.
16. Valbuena D, Martin J, De Pablo JL, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simón C. Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo. Fertil Steril 2001;76:962-968.