A review of epidemiological data on the risks of using a telephone while driving

Driver Distraction and Inattention: Advances in Research and Countermeasures

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 171-193

  Martin, Jean Louis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900680520     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Backer-Grondahl, A. and Sagberg, F. 2011.Driving and telephoning; relative accident risk when using hand-held and hands-free mobile phones. Safety Science, 49: 324-30.
2. Brace, C., Young, K. and Regan, M. 2007. Analysis of the literature: the use of mobiles phones while driving. Vagverket, Monash University, Accident Research Centre: 35.
3. Braver, E.R., Lund, A.K. and McCartt, A.T. 2009. Hands-free embedded cell phones and airbagdeployment crash rates. Risk Anal, 29: 1069, author reply 1070-jj1.
4. Caird, J., Scialfa, C., Geoffrey, H. and Smiley, A. 2004. Effects of cellular telephones on driving behaviour and crash risk: results of meta-analysis. CAA Foundation for traffic safety, University of Calgary: 39.
5. Chapelon, J. and Sibi, P. 2007. Le téléphone portable au volant. Observatoire national interministériel de sécurité routière. Report 28 March 2007.
6. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.
7. Gibson, J.E., Hubbard, R.B., Smith, C.J., Tata, L.J., Britton, J.R. and Fogarty, A.W. 2009. Use of self-controlled analytical techniques to assess the association between use of prescription medications and the risk of motor vehicle crashes. Am J Epidemiol, 169: 761-68.
8. Greenland, S. 1982. The effect of misclassification in matched-pair case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol, 116: 402-6.
9. Greenland, S. and Kleinbaum, D. 1983.Correcting for misclassification in two-way tables and matched-pair studies. Int J Epidemiology, 12: 93-97.
10. Grender, J.M. and Johnson, W.D. 1993. Analysis of crossover designs with multivariate response. Stat Med, 12: 69-89.
11. Guo, F., Klauer, S., Hankey, J. and Dingus, T. 2010. Near crashes as crash surrogate for naturalistic driving studies. Transportation Research Record, 2147: 66-74.
12. Hickman, J.S., Hanowski, R.J. and Bocanegra, J. 2010. Distraction in commercial trucks and buses: assessing prevalence and risk in conjunction with crashes and near-crashes. US department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier safety Administration, Report, September 2010.
13. INSPQ 2007. Avis de santé publique sur les effets du cellulaire au volant et recommandations. Institut National de santé publique du Québec, 85.
14. Klauer, S., Dingus, V., Neale, J., Sudweeks, J.D. and Ramsey, D.J. 2006. The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100 car naturalistic driving study data. NHTSA, National Technical Information Service, Virginia, 182.
15. Laberge-Nadeau, C., Bellavance, F., Angers, J., Maag, U. et al. 2006. Crash risk and cell phone use: Important questions on the real risk for legal decision makers. Valdor Conference, Stockholm: 305-14.
16. Laberge-Nadeau, C., Bellavance, F., Angers, J., Maag, U. et al. 2003. Wireless telephones and the risk of road crashes. Accid Anal Prev, 35: 649-60.
17. Lenguerrand, E., Martin, J.L., Moskal, A., Gadegbeku, B. and Laumon, B. 2008. Limits of the quasi-induced exposure method when compared with the standard case-control design. Application to the estimation of risks associated with driving under the influence of cannabis or alcohol. Accid Anal Prev, 40(3): 861-68.
18. Marshall, R.J. and Jackson, R.T. 1993. Analysis of case-crossover designs. Stat Med, 12: 2333-41.
19. McCartt, A., Hellinga, L. and Bratiman, K. 2006. Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Inj Prev, 7: 89-106.
20. McEvoy, S., Stevenson, M., McCartt, A., Woodward, M., Haworth, C. et al. 2005.Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. BMJ, 2005: 331: 428.
21. Nabi, H., Salmi, R., Lafont, S., Chiron, M., Zins, M. and Lagarde, E. 2007. Attitudes associated with behavioral predictors of serious road traffic crashes: results from the GAZEL cohort. Injury Prevention, 13: 26-31.
22. NHTSA 2010. Traffic safety facts, driver electronic device use n 2009. Report No. DOT HS 811 372, http://www.distraction.gov/research/PDF-Files/Driver-Electronic-Device-Use-2009.pdf, Washington DC: NHTSA.
23. Olson, R., Hanowski, R., Hickman, J. and Bocanegra, J. 2009. Driver distraction in commercial vehicle operations. US DoT, Federa lMotor Carrier Safety Administration: 49.
24. ONISR 2008. La sécurité routière en France, bilan de l'année 2007. La Documentation Française, Paris.
25. Redelmeier, D. and Tibshirani, R. 1997a. Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. N Engl J Med, 336: 453-58.
26. Redelmeier, D. and Tibshirani, R. 1997b. Interpretation and bias in case-crossover studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 50: 1281-87.
27. Redelmeier, D. and Tibshirani, R. 1997c. Is using a car phone like driving drunk? Chance: 5-9.
28. Redelmeier, D. and Tibshirani, R. 2001. Car phones and car crashes: some popular misconceptions. CMAJ 2001, 164: 1581-82.
29. Redelmeier, D., Tibshirani, R. and Evans, L. 2003. Traffic-law enforcement and risk of death from motor-vehicle crashes: case-crossover study. Lancet 2003, 361: 2177-82.
30. Redelmeier, D., Tibshirani, R. and Evans, L 1995. The urban traffic environment and the risk of child pedestrian injury: a case-crossover approach. Epidemiology, 6: 169-71.
31. Sagberg, F. 2001. Accident risk of car drivers during mobile telephone use. Int J Vehicle Design, 26: 57-69.
32. Sayer, J., Devonshire, J. and Flannagan, C. 2005. The effects of secondary tasks on naturalistic driving performance. UMTRI, University of Michigan: 48.
33. Schouten, H. and Kester, A. 2009.A simple analysis of a simple crossover trial with a dichotomous outcome measure. Stat Med, 29: 193-98.
34. Stamatiadis, N. and Deacon, J.A. 1997. Quasi-induced exposure: methodology and insight. Accid Anal Prev, 29: 37-52.
35. Sullman, M. and Baas, P. 2004. Mobile phone use amongst New Zealand drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7: 95-105.
36. Tibshirani, R. and Redelmeier, D. 1997. Cellular telephones and motor-vehicle collisions; some variations on matched-pairs analysis. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 25: 581-91.
37. Violenti, J.M. 1998. Cellular phone and fatal traffic collisions. Accid Anal Prev, 30: 519-24.
38. Violenti, J.M. and Marshall, J.R. 1996. Cellular phones and traffic accidents: An epidemiological approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28: 265-70.
39. Wilson, J., Fang, M., Wiggins, S. and Cooper, P. 2003. Collision and violation involvement of drivers who use cellular telephones. Traffic Inj Prev, 4: 45-52.
40. Young, R.A. and Schreiner, C. 2009. Real-world personal conversations using a hands-free embedded wireless device while driving: effect on airbag-deployment crash rates. Risk Anal, 29: 187-204.