Lisbon strategy and social policy in the enlarged European Union and in Turkey

Converging Europe: Transformation of Social Policy in the Enlarged European Union and in Turkey

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-26

  Eren Vural, Ipek ^a,b  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900617611     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Armstrong, K. 2007. Social Governance after Lisbon: The Ambiguities of Policy Coordination. European Studies Association Biennial Conference, Montreal, Canada, 17-19 May 2007.
2. Begg, I. 2008. Is there a convincing rationale for the Lisbon strategy? Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 427-35.
3. Borras, S. and Jacobsson, K. 2004. The open method of coordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185-208.
4. Berghman, J. 2009. The Lisbon agenda on social policy: revitalising the European Social Model, in Europe, Globalisation, and the Lisbon Agenda, edited by J.M. Rodrigues. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 165-76.
5. Bernhard, S. 2010. From conflict to consensus: European neoliberalism and the debate on the future of EU social policy. Work, Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 4(1), Spring, 175-92.
6. Bieler, A. and Morton, A.D. 2001. Introduction: neo-Gramscian perspectives in international political economy and the relevance to European integration, in Social Forces in the Making of Europe, edited by A. Bieler and A.D. Morton. New York: Palgrave, 3-24.
7. Borras, S. and Jacobsson, K. 2004. The open method of coordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185-208.
8. Buchs, M. 2009. The Open Method of Coordination: effectively preventing welfare state retrenchment. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), Special Issue 1, 13, edited by S. Kroger. What have we learnt: Advances, Pitfalls, and Remaining Questions in OMC Research. Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-011a.htm.
9. Chalmers, D. and Lodge, M. 2003. The Open Method of Coordination and the European Welfare State. Discussion paper, No: 11, June 2003, ESRC Center for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science.
10. Chang, M. 2007. The Lisbon Strategy. Papers Prepared for the Colloquium Working for Europe: Perspectives on the EU 50 years after the Treaties of Rome, Bruge Political Research Papers, College of Europe, 4 June 2007.
11. Collignon, S. 2004. Is Europe going far enough: reflections on EU's economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(5), October, 909-25.
12. Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Proposal for a Council Decision on Guidelines for the Employment Policies of the Member States.
13. Commission of the European Communities. 2005. Working Together, Working Better: A New Framework for the Open Coordination of Social Protection and Inclusion in the European Union. COM (2005) 706 Final.
14. Commission of the European Communities. 2008. Communication from the Commission to the European Council: A European Economic Recovery Plan. COM(2008) 800 Final, Brussels, 26.11.2008.
15. Commission of the European Communities. 2009. Economic Crisis in Europe: Causes, Consequences and Responses. Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, September, European Economy 7, Provisional Version.
16. Commission of the European Communities. 2010. Lisbon Strategy Evaluation Document. Commission Staff Working Document., SEC(2010)114 Final.
17. Council of the European Union. 2000 Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000, Presidency Conclusions.
18. Council of the European Union. Council Decision 19 January 2001 on Guidelines for Member States' employment policies for the year 2001. Official Journal, L022, 24.01.2001, 0018-0026. Available online at: http:www.lexunict.it/eurolabor/en/documentation/altridoc/decision190101.htm, [accessed on 14.09.2010].
19. Council of the European Union. 2005. 2005/600/EC 12 July 2005 On Guidelines for the Employment of the Member States.
20. Council of the European Union. 2006. 7294 Joint Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion, Annex, 13 March 2006.
21. Council of the European Union. 2008. Council Decision on Guidelines for the Employment Policies of the Member States. 10614/2/08 REV2 Integrated Guidelines.
22. Daly, M. 2006. EU social policy after Lisbon. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 461-81.
23. de la Porte, C. and Pochet, P. 2002. Supple co-ordination at EU Level, in Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Co-ordination, edited by C. de la Porte and P. Pochet. Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lag, 27-68.
24. de la Porte, C. and Pochet, P. 2004. The European Employment Strategy: existing research and remaining questions. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(1), 71-8.
25. de la Porte, C. and Pochet, P. 2005. Participation in the Open Method of Co-ordination. The Cases of Employment and Social Inclusion', in The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, edited by J. Zeitlin and P. Pochet with L. Magnusson. Brussels: P.I.E-Peter Lang, 353-89.
26. de la Porte, C. and Pochet, P., Natali, D. and Pochet, P. 2009. Self-governance in EU employment and social policy through the Open Method of Co-ordination, in The Politics of Self-Governance, edited by E. Sørensen and P. Triantafillou. Surrey: Ashgate, 187-210.
27. Euromemorandum 2009/2010. Europe in Crisis: A Critique of the EU's failure to Respond.
28. Eurostat. 2010. Employment Rate in the EU27 fell to 64.6% in 2009, News Release, 117/2010, 4 August.
29. Gill, S. 2001. Constitutionalising capital: EMU and disciplinary neoliberalism in Social Forces in the making of new Europe, edited by A.Bieler, A.D.Morton. New York: Palgrave, 47-69.
30. Goetschy, J. 2007. The implications of Lisbon Strategy for the future of social Europe: on the road or new age? The international Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 23(4), 499-523.
31. Goetschy, J. 2009. The Lisbon Strategy and social Europe: two closely linked destinies, in Europe, Globalisation, and the Lisbon Agenda, edited by J.M. Rodrigues. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 74-90.
32. Hager, S. 2009. New Europeans for the new European economy: citizenship and the Lisbon Agenda, in Contradictions and Limits of Neoliberal European Governance, edited by B. Van Apeldoorn, J. Drahokoupil and L. Horn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 106-24.
33. Hemerijck A. 2002. The self-transformation of the European Social Model(s), in Why We Need a New Welfare State, edited by G. Esping-Andersen, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck and J. Myles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173-215.
34. Holman, O. 2004. Asymmetrical regulation and multidimensional governance in the European Union. Review of International Political Economy, 11(4), 714-35.
35. Holman, O. and van der Pijl, K. 2003. Structure and process in transnational European business, in Ruined Fortress: Neoliberal Hegemony and Transformation in Europe, edited by A. Cafruny and M. Ryner. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, 71-93.
36. IMF. 2010. Regional Economic Outlook, Europe Fostering Sustainibility, World Economic and Financial Surveys, May.
37. Jacobsson, K. 2004. Soft regulation and the subtle transformation of states: the case of EU employment policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(4), 355-70.
38. Kleinman, M. 2002. A European Welfare State? New York: Palgrave.
39. Kohler-Koch, B. and Finke, B. 2007. The institutional shaping of EU-society relations: a contribution to democracy via participation? Journal of Civil Society, 3(3), 205-21.
40. Kok, W. 2004. Facing the challenge, Brussels: European Commission.
41. Kroger, S. 2009. The Open Method of Coordination: Underconceptualisation, overdetermination, depoliticisation and beyond. European Integration Online Papers(Ei{dotless}oP) Special Issue 1, 13, edited by S. Kroger What we have learnt: Advances, Pitfalls, and Remaining Questions in OMC Research. Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009.005a/htm.
42. Lapavitsas, C. et al. 2010a. Eurozone Crisis: Beggar Thyself and Thy your Neighbour, Research on Money and Finance, RMF Occasional Report, March 2010.
43. Manow, P. Schafer, A. and Zorn, H. 2004. European Social Policy and Europe's Party Political Center of Gravity 1957-2003, MPlfG Discussion Paper, No: 04/6, September 2004, Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
44. Moussis, N. 2009. Access to European Union, 18th Edition, European Study Service: Rixensart.
45. Nanto, K.D. 2009. The Global Financial Crisis: Analysis and Policy Implications' Congressional Research Service. Report for Congress, Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress. RL34742.
46. Natali, D. 2009. The Lisbon Strategy a decade on: a critical review of a multidisciplinary literature. Transfer: European Review of Labor and Research, 01/9, 15, Spring, 111-37.
47. Pochet P. 2006. Debate around the Social Model: evolving players, strategies, and dynamics, in Social Developments in the European Union 2005, edited by C. Degryse and P. Pochet. Brussels: ETUI Observatoire Social Europeen and Saltsa, 79-99.
48. Pochet, P. and Boulin, Y. 2009. Introduction. Transfer: European Review of Labor and Research, 1/09 15(1) Spring, 21-32.
49. Pochet, P., Boulin, J.Y. and Dufour, C. 2009. Some tentative conclusions. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 1/09 15(1) Spring, 139-46.
50. Rodrigues, J.M. 2004. An Overview of the Lisbon Strategy: European Agenda for Competitiveness, Employment and Social Cohesion. Konferenz des Kompetenzteams Wirtschaft: So profitiert Osterreich, 17 September 2004.
51. Rodrigues, J.M. 2006. The Lisbon Strategy after the midterm review: implications for innovation and lifelong learning. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 349-57.
52. Rodrigues, J.M. 2009. Europe, globalisation, and the Lisbon Agenda: an introduction, in Europe, Globalisation, and the Lisbon Agenda, edited by J.M. Rodrigues. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 1-19.
53. Rodrigues, J.M. 2010. The EU in a Globalised World, The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs. Presentation for 'On the EU 2020 Strategy: Contributions after the Lisbon Agenda Experience, 18.01.2010. Available at: http://www.mariojoarodrigues.eu/lisbon-agenda, [accessed on 14.06.2010].
54. Sabel, C. and Zeitlin, J. 2007. Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. European Governance papers (EUROGOV), No C-07-02.
55. Scharpf, W.F. 2002. The European social model: coping with the challenges of diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645-70.
56. Schäfer, A. 2004. Beyond the community method: why the Open Method of Coordination was introduced to EU policy-making. European Integration online papers (EIoP), 8/13. Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004013a.htm.
57. Tilford, S. and Whyte, P. 2010. The Lisbon Scorecard X: The Road to 2020. Center for European Reform.
58. Trubek, D and Mosher, J. 2003. New governance, EU employment policy and the European social model, in Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, edited by J. Zeitlin and D. Trubek. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33-58.
59. Tucker, C. 2003. The Lisbon Strategy and the Open Method of Coordination: A New Vision and the Revolutionary Potential of Soft Governance in the European Union. The Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 28-31 August.
60. Van Apeldoorn, B. 2002. Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European Integration. London: Routledge.
61. Van Apeldoorn, B. 2009. The contradictions of embedded neoliberalism and Europe's multilevel legitimacy crisis: the European project and its limits, in Contradictions and Limits of Neoliberal European Governance, edited by B. Van Apeldoorn, J. Drahokoupil and L. Horn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 21, 43.
62. Van Apeldoorn, B., Overbeek, H., Ryner, B. 2003. Theories of European integration: a critique, in A Ruined Fortress: Neoliberal Hegemony and Transformation in Europe, edited by A. Cafruny and M. Ryner. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 17-45.
63. Van der Pijl, K. 2006. A Lockean Europe? New Left Review, 37, January-February, 9-37.
64. Weiler, A. 2009. Formulation of the European Employment Strategy for Post Lisbon Period in the Context of Economic Crisis. European Employment Observatory (EEO), Thematic Paper, September.
65. Wincott, D. 2003. Beyond social regulation? New instruments and/or a new agenda for social policy at Lisbon?. Public Administration, 81(3), 533-53.
66. Zeitlin, J. 2007. Strengthening the Social Dimension of the Lisbon Strategy. Paper prepared for to an informal meeting of the EU Social Protection Committee, Erfurt Germany, 23 May 2007, published in the Belgian Review of Social Security, No: 2, October 2007, 459-73. Available at: http://www.socialsecurity.fgov.be/bib/rbss.htm.
67. Zeitlin, J. 2008. The Open Method of Coordination and the governance of the Lisbon Strategy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 436-50.
68. Zgajewski, T. and Hajjar, K. 2005. The Lisbon Strategy: Which Failure, Whose Failure and Why? Egmont Paper 6, Royal Institute for International Relations, Brussels, May 2005, Academia Press.