Creating a patchwork quilt for teaching and learning: The use of learning objects in teacher education

Learning Objects for Instruction: Design and Evaluation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 261-279

  Hill, Janette R ^a   Hannafin, Michael J ^a   Recesso, Arthur ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900611759     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-334-0.ch016     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Chitwood, K., May, C., Bunnow, D., & Langan, T. (2002). Battle stories from the field: Wisconsin online resource center learning objects project. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, IN: Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved February 5, 2007, from http://reusability.org/read/
2. Clark, R. C. (1992). EPSS: Look before you leap: Some cautions about applications of electronic performance support systems. Performance & Instruction, 31(5), 22-25.
3. DiStefano, A., Rudestam, K. E., & Silverman, R. (2004). Encyclopedia of distributed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Downes, S. (2004). Resource profiles. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 5, 1-32.
5. Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Back Bay Books.
6. Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., & McCarthy, J. (2001). Designing resource-based learning and performance support systems. In D. Wiley (Ed.), Learning objects (pp. 99-130). Bloomington, IN: AECT.
7. Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52.
8. Hodgins, H. W. (2001). The future of learning objects. In D. Wiley (Ed.), Learning objects (pp. 281-298). Bloomington, IN: AECT.
9. Koper, R., & Manderveld, J. (2004). Educational modeling language: modeling reusable, interoperable, rich and personalized units of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 537-551.
10. Kurz, T., Llama, G., & Savenye, W. (2005). Issues and challenges of creating video cases to be used with preservice teachers. TechTrends, 49(4), 67-73.
11. LTSC. (2000). Learning technology standards committee Website. Retrieved February 5, 2007, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/
12. McGee, P., & Diaz, V. (2005). Planning for the digital classroom and distributed learning: Policies and planning for online instructional resources. Planning for Higher Education, 33(4), 12-24.
13. Merrill, M. D. (2001). Knowledge objects and mental models. In D. Wiley (Ed.), Learning objects (pp. 261-280). Bloomington, IN: AECT.
14. Nugent, G. (2005). User and delivery of learning objects in K-12: The public television experience. TechTrends, 49(4), 61-66.
15. Parrish, P. E. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 49-67.
16. Recesso, A., Hannafin, M. J., Wang, F., Deaton, B., Shepherd, C., & Rich, P. (in press). Direct evidence and the continuous evolution of teacher practice. In P. Adamy & N Milman (Eds), Evaluating electronic portfolios in teacher education. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
17. Reigeluth, C. M., & Nelson, L. M. (1997). A new paradigm of ISD? In R. C. Branch & B. B. Minor (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 22, pp. 24-35). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
18. Shambaugh, R. N., & Magliaro, S. G. (1996). Mastering the possibilities: A process approach to instructional design. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Wiley, D. (2001). Learning objects. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
20. Wojtas, O. (2005, April 29). Jump for jorum. The Times Higher Education Supplement, pp. 6-7.