Quantitative assessments of municipal waste management systems: Using different indicators to compare and rank programs in New York State

Waste Management

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 825-836

  Greene, Krista L ^a   Tonjes, David J ^a  

^a Stony Brook University   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental performance; Indicator; Indicator criteria; Municipal waste management; Ranking; System evaluation

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; RANKING; SYSTEM EVALUATION;

BENCHMARKING; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS); WASTE DISPOSAL;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLLUTION POLICY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANKING; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE TECHNOLOGY;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; ENERGY CONSERVATION; LANDFILL; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECYCLING; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

NEW YORK; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84900596711     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Al-Khatib I.A., Arafat H.A., Basheer T., Shawahneh H., Salahat A., Eid J., Ali W. Trends and problems of solid waste management in developing countries: a case study in seven Palestinian districts. Waste Manage. 2007, 27:1910-1919.
2. Alexander C., Smaje C., Timlett R., Williams I. Improving social technologies for recycling. Waste Resour. Manage. 2009, 162:15-28.
3. Aneki.com., 2013. Countries with the Highest Recycling Rates. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.aneki.com/recycling_countries.html.
4. Ando A.W., Gosselin A.Y. Recycling in multi-family dwellings: does convenience matter?. Econ. Inq. 2005, 43:426-438.
5. Armijo, C., Puma, A., Ojeda, S., 2011. A set of indicators for waste management programs. In: 2nd International Conference on Environmental Engineering and Applications, LACSIT Press, Singapore, 2011.
6. Arsova, L., van Haaren, R., Goldstein, N., Kaufman, S., Themelis, N., 2008. The state of garbage in America. In: BioCycle.
7. Asase M., Yanful E.K., Mensah M., Stanford J., Amponsah S. Comparison of municipal solid waste management systems in Canada and Ghana: a case study of the cities of London, Ontario, and Kumasi, Ghana. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:2779-2786.
8. Bahor B., Van Brunt M., Stovall J., Blue K. Integrated waste management as a climate change stabilization wedge. Waste Manage. Res. 2009, 27:839-849.
9. Behn R.D. Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Publ. Admin. Rev. 2003, 63:586-606.
10. Beigl P., Lebersorger S., Salhofer S. Modeling municipal solid waste generation: a review. Waste Manage. 2008, 28:200-214.
11. Blalock H.M. Social Statistics 1979, McGraw-Hill, New York.
12. Blengini G.A., Garbarino E., Solar S., Shields D.J., Hamor T., Vinai R., Agioutantis Z. Life cycle assessment guidelines for the sustainable production and recycling of aggregates: the Sustainable Aggregates Resource Management project (SARMa). J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 27:177-181.
13. Cereplast, 2013. Portland is one of the Greenest Cities in the US. Cereplast. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.cereplast.com/portland-or-one-of-the-greenest-cities-in-us/.
14. Chavez A., Armijo de Vega C., Benitez O. Measuring progress of waste management programs. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Develop. 2011, 2:372-376.
15. Chester M., Martin E. Cellulosic ethanol from municipal solid waste: a case study of the economic, energy, and greenhouse gas impacts in California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:5183-5189.
16. Chester M., Martin E., Sathaye N. Energy, greenhouse gas, and cost reductions for municipal recycling systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:2142-2149.
17. Chowdhury M. Searching quality data for municipal solid waste planning. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:2240-2247.
18. Clarke M.J., Maantay J.A. Optimizing recycling in all of New York City's neighborhoods: using GIS to develop the REAP index for improved recycling education, awareness, and participation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2006, 46:128-148.
19. Cleary J. Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. Environ. Int. 2009, 35:1256-1266.
20. Corvaln C., Briggs D., Zieluis G. Decision Making in Environmental Health 2000, E & FN Spon, New York.
21. Dahlen L., Aberg H., Lagerkvist A., Berg P.E.O. Inconsistent pathways of household waste. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:1798-1806.
22. Dahlen, L., 2005. To Evaluate Source Sorting Programs in Household Waste Collection Systems. Thesis from Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, LuleA University of Technology, p. 83.
23. Desmond M. Municipal solid waste management in Ireland: assessing for sustainability. Irish Geogr. 2006, 39(1):22-33.
24. DSM, 2008. Analysis of New York City Department of Sanitation Curbside Recycling and Refuse Costs. http://docs.nrdc.org/cities/files/cit_08052801A.pdf.
25. Einstein, D., 1996. Comparing campus recycling programs: apples to apples or whales to lawnmowers. In: APPA Educational Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 1996.
26. Ekvall T., Assefa G., Björklund A., Eriksson O., Finnveden G. What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manage. 2007, 27:989-996.
27. Eriksson O., Baky A. Identification and testing of potential key parameters in system analysis of municipal solid waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2010, 54:1095-1099.
28. Feiock R., Kalan L. Assessing the performance of solid waste recycling programs over time. Am. Rev. Publ. Admin. 2001, 31:22-32.
29. Ferrara I., Missios P. Recycling and waste diversion effectiveness: evidence from Canada. Environ. Resource Econ. 2005, 30:221-238.
30. Fischer C. The development and achievements of EU waste policy. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage. 2011, 13:2-9.
31. Folz D.H., Hazlett J.M. Public participation and recycling performance: explaining program success. Publ. Admin. Rev. 1991, 51:526-532.
32. Gallopin, G.C., 1997. Indicators and their use: information for decision-making-introduction. In: Sustainability Indicators: Report of the Project of Indicators for Sustainable Development. Wiley/Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment.
33. Gellynck X., Jacobsen R., Verhelst P. Identifying the key factors in increasing recycling and reducing residual household waste: a case study of the Flemish region of Belgium. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92:2683-2690.
34. Goldstein, N., 2007. Measuring diversion, recycling progress. In: BioCycle, pp. 52-54.
35. Greene, K.L., Aphale, O., Ntshalintshali, G., Nayak, P., Swanson, L., Tonjes, D.J., 2011. Recycling on Long Island 2009. http://www.stonybrook.edu/est/research/FINAL%20Recycling%20Report%20(4-16-11)%20PDF.pdf.
36. Greene, K.L., 2010. Inconsistencies in Municipal Solid Waste Measurement: Implications for Recycling Program Comparisons. MS Thesis from Department of Technology and Society, Stony Brook University.
37. Guimaraes B., Simoes P., Marques R.C. Does performance evaluation help public managers? A balanced scorecard approach in urban waste services. J. Environ. Manage. 2010, 91(12):2632-2638.
38. Hazel A.N. The revised directive on waste: resolving legislative tensions in waste management?. J. Environ. Law 2009, 21:139-149.
39. Henry R.K., Zhao Y.S., Dong J. Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing countries - Kenyan case study. Waste Manage. 2006, 26:92-100.
40. Huffington Post, 2012. America's Greenest City: San Francisco Now Reuses 80% of its Waste. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/08/americas-greenest-city_n_1949160.html.
41. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 1999. ISO 14031: environmental management. In: Environmental Performance Evaluation - Guidelines.
42. Jasch C. Environmental performance evaluation and indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 2000, 8:79-88.
43. Jenkins R.R., Kopits E., Simpson D. Policy monitor - the evolution of solid and hazardous waste regulation in the United States. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2009, 3:104-120.
44. Jennings S. Indicators to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries. Fish Fish. 2005, 6:212-232.
45. Jorgensen S.E., Xi F.L., Costanza R. Handbook of Ecological Indicators for Assessment of Ecosystem Health 2010, CRC Press, USA. second ed.
46. Kaufman S.M., Krishnan N., Themelis N.J. A screening life cycle metric to benchmark the environmental sustainability of waste management systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:5949-5955.
47. Kaufman, S., 2008. A New Screening Metric to Benchmark the Sustainability of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems. Dissertation for Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, p. 163.
48. Kaufman S.M., Themelis N.J. Using a direct method to characterize and measure flows of municipal solid waste in the United States. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2009, 59:1386-1390.
49. King C., Gunton J., Freebairn D., Coutts J., Webb I. The sustainability of indicator industry: where to from here? A focus group study to explore the potential of farmer participation in the development of an indicators. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2000, 40:631-642.
50. Kollikkathara N., Feng H., Stern E. A purview of waste management evolution: special emphasis on USA. Waste Manage. 2009, 29(2):974-985.
51. Lange, R., 2012. Scavenging's impact upon curbside collections. In: Federation of New York Solid Waste Association's Solid Waste and Recycling Conference, Bolton Landing, NY, 2012.
52. Lave L.B., Hendrickson C.T. Municipal solid waste recycling issues. J. Environ. Eng. 1999, 125:944.
53. Lavee D., Khatib M. Benchmarking in municipal solid waste recycling. Waste Manage. 2010, 30:2204-2208.
54. Lehman S. Optimizing urban material flows and waste streams in urban development through principles of zero waste and sustainable consumption. Sustainable Solid Waste Management 2012, Taylor and Francis, New York. S.B. Rav, S. Azem (Eds.).
55. Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Nie S.L. A mathematical model for identifying an optimal waste management policy under uncertainty. Appl. Math. Model. 2012, 36(6):2658-2673.
56. Loughlin D.H., Barlaz M.A. Policies for strengthening markets for recyclables: a worldwide perspective. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 36:287-326.
57. Massoud M.A., El-Fadel M., Malak A.A. Assessment of public vs private MSW management: a case study. J. Environ. Manage. 2003, 69:15-24.
58. Melosi M.V. The Sanitary City 2000, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
59. Mendes C., de Souza L.S., Kalid R., Esquerre K., Kiperstok A. Assessment of the uncertainty associated with the energy indicator. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15:3156-3164.
60. Mendes P., Santos A.C., Perna F., Teixeira M.R. The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: a case study in the waste sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 24:20-29.
61. Montgomery County, 2013. Montgomery County has Highest Waste Diversion, Recycling Rates in Maryland. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www6.montgomerycountymd.gov/Apps/News/press/PR_details.asp?PrID=9391.
62. Morrissey A.J., Browne J. Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Manage. 2004, 24:297-308.
63. Mueller W. The effectiveness of recycling policy options: waste diversion or just diversion?. Waste Manage. 2013, 33(3):508-518.
64. New York City (NYC) Bureau of Waste Prevention, Reuse and Recycling (NYBWRR), 2001. NYC Recycling in Context: A Comprehensive Analysis of Recycling in Major US Cities. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.nyc.gov/html/dsny/html/swmp/recywprpts.shtml.
65. New York State (NYS) Department of Health, 2009. Vital statistics of NY State. In: Table 2: Population, Land Area, and Population Density by County, New York State, 2009. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/2009/.
66. Nicolli F. Convergence of waste-related indicators of environmental quality in Italy. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2012, 14:383-401.
67. Niemeijer D., Groot R.S. A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol. Ind. 2008, 8:14-25.
68. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), 2010. Beyond Waste: A Sustainable Materials Management Strategy for New York State.
69. OECD, 2003. Environmental Indicators: Development, Measurement, and Use. OECD, Paris.
70. Papageorgiou A., Barton J.R., Karagiannidis A. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:2999-3012.
71. Perotto E., Canziani R., Marchesi R., Butelli P. Environmental performance, indicators and measurement uncertainties in EMS context: a case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16:517-530.
72. Piet G.J., Jansen H.M., Rochet M.-J. Evaluating potential indicators for an ecosystem approach to fishery management in European waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci./J. Conseil 2008, 65:1449-1455.
73. Pillsbury, H., 1998. Standardizing recycling measurements. In: BioCycle, pp. 39-40.
74. Pires A., Martinho G., Chang N.B. Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis techniques. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92:1033-1050.
75. Rabasca, L., 1994. State recycling rates plateau. In: Waste Age, pp. 48-55.
76. Recycle Mania, 2013. Competition Division Results. (accessed 08.07.13). http://recyclemaniacs.org/scoreboard/current-results/competition-division.
77. Rhyner C.R. The effects on waste reduction and recycling rates when different components of the waste stream are counted. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1998, 24:349-361.
78. Rice J.C., Rochet M.J. A framework for selecting a suite of indicators for fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2005, 62:516-527.
79. Riley J. Indicator quality for assessment of impact of multidisciplinary systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 87:121-128.
80. San Francisco (City and County of), 2010. San Francisco Achieved 77% Landfill Diversion Rate, the Highest of Any US City. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www5.sfgov.org/sf_news/2010/08/san-francisco-achieves-77-landfill-diversion-rate-the-highest-of-any-us-city.html.
81. Scheinberg A., Anschütz J. Slim Pickin's: supporting waste pickers in the ecological modernization of urban waste management systems. Int. J. Technol. Manage. Sustain. Develop. 2006, 5:257-270.
82. Schomaker M. Development of environmental indicators in UNEP. FAO Land Water Bull. 1997, 5:25-33.
83. Scipioni A., Mazzi A., Zuliani F., Mason M. The ISO 14031 standard to guide the urban sustainability measurement process: an Italian experience. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16:1247-1257.
84. Sidique S.F., Lupi F., Joshi S.V. The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2010, 54:163-170.
85. Simmons, P., Kaufman, S., Themelis, N., 2006. State of garbage in America recycling analysis. In: BioCycle, pp. 21-25.
86. Snell H., Hurst M. The EU waste framework directive and its effects. Kunststoffe Int. 2009, 99:18-20.
87. Stevens, B., 1999. Multi-family recycling: costs, diversion, and program characteristics. In: US Conference of Mayors, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
88. Sullivan, D., 2011. Zero waste on San Francisco's horizon. In: BioCycle, pp. 28-32.
89. Suttibak S., Nitivattananon V. Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2008, 53:45-56.
90. Taboada-González P., Aguilar-Virgen Q., Ojeda-Benítez S., Armijo C. Waste characterization and waste management perception in rural communities in Mexico: a case study. Environ. Eng. Manage. J. (EEMJ) 2011, 10:1751-1759.
91. Themelis, N., Kaufman, S., 2010. Improving methods of MSW measurement. In: BioCycle, pp. 34-37.
92. Tojo, N., Fischer, C., 2011. Europe as a Recycling Society (Working Paper).
93. Tonjes D.J., Greene K.L. A review of national municipal solid waste generation assessments in the USA. Waste Manage. Res. 2012, 30:758-771.
94. Tonjes D., Swanson L. How do we measure them? Lessons from Long Island on Computing Recycling Rates. J. Urban Technol. 2000, 7:63-79.
95. Troschinetz A.M., Mihelcic J.R. Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:915-923.
96. Tsoulfas G.T., Pappis C.P. A model for supply chains environmental performance analysis and decision making. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16:1647-1657.
97. United States Government Revenue, 2010. State Revenue Ranking. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.usgovernmentrevenue.com/state_tax_rank.
98. US Census Bureau, 2010. 2010 US Census.
99. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1997. Converting to the Standard Recycling Rate. http://www.epa.gov/osw/conserve/tools/recmeas/docs/worksh_a.pdf.
100. USEPA, 2001. Multifamily Recycling: A National Study. http://www.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/municipal/pubs/multifamily.pdf.
101. USEPA, 2011. MSW in the US: Facts and Figures. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/municipal/msw99.htm.
102. USEPA, 2012a. Municipal Solid Waste. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/municipal/index.htm.
103. USEPA, 2012b. Solid Waste Management and Greenhouse Gases: Documentation for Greenhouse Gas Emission and Energy Factors Used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) (accessed 08.07.13).
104. Vergara, S., 2011. Transforming trash: reuse as a waste management and climate change mitigation strategy. In: Energy and Resources, University of California, Berkeley; ProQuest, p. 131.
105. Vergara S.E., Damgaard A., Horvath A. Boundaries matter: greenhouse gas emission reductions from alternative waste treatment strategies for California's municipal solid waste. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 57:87-97.
106. Vergara, S., Tchobanoglous, G., 2012. Municipal solid waste and the environment: a global perspective. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. (Review in Advance).
107. Vermeulen I., Block C., Van Caneghem J., Dewulf W., Sikdar S.K., Vandecasteele C. Sustainability assessment of industrial waste treatment processes: the case of automotive shredder residue. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 69:17-28.
108. Vinyes E., Oliver-Sola J., Ugaya C., Rieradevall J., Gasol C.M. Application of LCSA to used cooking oil waste management. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 18:445-455.
109. WRN, 2012. Municipal Recycling Rankings. (accessed 08.07.13). http://www.wasterecyclingnews.com/article/99999999/DATA/120529980/2012-municipal-recycling-rankings.
110. Wen L., Lin C.H., Lee S.C. Review of recycling performance indicators: a study on collection rate in Taiwan. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:2248-2256.
111. Wenger R.B., Rhyner C.R., Wagoner E.E. Relating disposal-based solid waste reduction rates to recycling rates. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1997, 20:267-276.
112. Wilson D.C. Development drivers for waste management. Waste Manage. Res. 2007, 25:198-207.
113. Wilson D.C., Rodic L., Scheinberg A., Velis C.A., Alabaster G. Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Waste Manage. 2012, 30:237-254.
114. Winkler J., Bilitewski B. Comparative evaluation of life cycle assessment models for solid waste management. Waste Manage. 2007, 27:1021-1031.
115. Wittmaier M., Langer S., Sawilla B. Possibilities and limitations of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the development of waste utilization systems - applied examples for a region in Northern Germany. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:1732-1738.