The theory of information worlds and information behaviour

Library and Information Science

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 161-180

  Burnett, Gary ^a   Jaeger, Paul T ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900529841     PISSN: 18760562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1876-05622011002011a010     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alejandro, R. (1993). Hermeneutics, citizenship, and the public sphere. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
2. Belkin, N. J. (1978). Information concepts for information science. Journal of Documentation, 34, 55-85.
3. Boeder, P. (2005). Habermas' heritage: The future of the public sphere in the network society. First Monday, 10(9). Retrieved from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1280/1200
4. Brand, A. (1990). The force of reason: An introduction to Habermas' theory of communicative action. New York, NY: Allen & Unwin.
5. Burnett, G., Besant, M., & Chatman, E. A. (2001). Small worlds: Normative behaviour in virtual communities and feminist bookselling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 536-547.
6. Burnett, G., & Erdelez, S. (2010). Forecasting the next 210 years in information behaviour research: A fish bowl dialogue. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(3). Retrieved from http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Feb-10/FebMar10_Burnett_Erdelez.html
7. Burnett, G., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). Small worlds, lifeworlds, and information: The ramifications of the information behaviour of social groups in public policy and the public sphere. Information Research, 13(2), paper 346. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper346.html
8. Burnett, G., Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2008). The social aspects of information access: The viewpoint of normative theory of information behaviour. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 56-66.
9. Burnett, K. (2010). VOSS: Virtual scientific teams: Life-cycle formation and longterm scientific collaboration. Retrieved from http://voss.cci.fsu.edu/
10. Burnett, K., Subramamiam, M., & Gibson, A. (2009). Latinas cross the IT border: Understanding gender as a boundary object between information worlds. First Monday, 14(9). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2581/2286
11. Buschman, J. E. (2006). "The integrity and obstinacy of intellectual creations": Jürgen Habermas and librarianship's theoretical literature. Library Quarterly, 76, 270-299.
12. Case, D. O. (2007). Looking for Information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behaviour (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Chatman, E. A. (1991). Life in a small world: Applicability of gratification theory to information-seeking behaviour. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 438-449.
14. Chatman, E. A. (1992). The information world of retired women. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
15. Chatman, E. A. (1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 207-217.
16. Chatman, E. A. (2000). Framing social life in theory and research. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, 3-17.
17. Clark, W. (2000). Activism in the public sphere: Exploring the discourse of political participation. Burlington, CT: Ashgate.
18. Corner, J. (1995). Television form and public address. London: Edward Arnold.
19. Culnan, M. J. (1983). Environmental scanning: The effects of task complexity and source accessibility on information gathering behaviour. Decision Sciences, 14(2), 194-206.
20. Culnan, M. J. (1984). The dimensions of accessibility to online information: Implications for implanting office information systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2(2), 141-150.
21. Culnan, M. J. (1985). The dimensions of perceived accessibility to information: Implications for the delivery of information systems and services. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(5), 302-308.
22. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.
23. Ewen, S. (1996). PR!: The social history of spin. New York, NY: Basic.
24. Fisher, K. E. (2005). Information grounds. In: K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez & E. F. McKechnie (Eds), Theories of information behaviour (pp. 185-190). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
25. Fisher, K. E., Durrance, J. C., & Hinton, M. B. (2004). Information grounds and the use of need based services by immigrants in Queens, New York: A context-based, outcome evaluation approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 754-766.
26. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-266). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action volume 1: Reason and rationalization of society. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
28. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformations of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
29. Habermas, J. (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere. In: J. Calhoun (Ed.), Critical social theory: Culture, theory and the challenge of difference (pp. 421-462). Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Habermas, J. (1996). The normative content of modernity. In: W. Outhewiate (Ed.), The Habermas reader (pp. 341-365). Cambridge: Polity.
31. Hiebert, R. E. (2003). Public relations and propaganda in framing the Iraq war: A preliminary review. Public Relations Review, 29, 243-255.
32. Hiebert, R. E. (2005). Commentary: New technologies, public relations, and democracy. Public Relations Review, 31, 1-9.
33. Jaeger, P. T. (2007). Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration's information politics. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 840-859.
34. Jaeger, P. T., & Bowman, C. A. (2005). Understanding disability: Inclusion, access, diversity, and civil rights. Westport, CT: Praeger.
35. Jaeger, P. T., & Burnett, G. (2005). Information access and exchange among small worlds in a democratic society: The role of policy in redefining information behaviour in the post-9/11 United States. Library Quarterly, 75(4), 464-495.
36. Jaeger, P. T., & Burnett, G. (2010). Information worlds: Social context, technology, & information behaviour in the age of the Internet. London: Routledge.
37. Johnson, C. A. (2010). Do public libraries contribute to social capital? A preliminary investigation into the relationship. Library&InformationScience Research, 32, 147-155.
38. Kulthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 361-371.
39. Law, C. M., Jaeger, P. T., & McKay, E. (2010). The need for developer-centered universal access design resources. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9, 327-335.
40. Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41. McClure, C. R., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). Government information policy research: Importance, approaches, and realities. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 257-264.
42. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999). Trends in analyzing access to information, part I: Cross-disciplinary conceptions of access. Information Processing and Management, 35, 45-76.
43. Murdock, G., & Golding, P. (1989). Information poverty and political inequality: Citizenship in the age of privatized communications. Journal of Communication, 39, 180-195.
44. Nerone, J. (1994). Violence against the press: Policing the public sphere in U.S. history. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45. Pendleton, V., & Chatman, E. A. (1998). Small world lives: Implications for the public library. Library Trends, 46, 732-752.
46. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Saracevic, T. (1996). Relevance reconsidered. Information science: Integration in perspectives. CoLIS2: Proceedings of the second international conference on conception of library & information science, Copenhagen, Denmark (pp. 201-218).
48. Savolainen, R. (2005). Everyday life information seeking. In: K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez & E. F. McKechnie (Eds), Theories of information behaviour (pp. 143-148). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
49. Starr, P. (2004). The creation of the media: Political origins of modern communication. New York, NY: Basic Books.
50. Streitfeld, D. (2010). Anger as a private company takes over libraries. The New York Times, September 26. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/business/27libraries.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general
51. Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
52. Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29, 178-194.
53. Thompson, K. M. (2006). Multidisciplinary approaches to information poverty and their implications for information access. Unpublished dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
54. Thompson, K. M. (2008). Remembering Elfreda Chatman: A champion of theory development in library and information science education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50, 119-126.
55. Truman, D. (1971). The governmental process: Political interests and public opinion (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Knopf.
56. Wiegand, W. A. (2005). Critiquing the curriculum. American Libraries, 36(1), 58-61.
57. Williams, R. (1958/1989). Culture is ordinary. In: R. Gable (Ed.), Resources of hope: Culture, democracy, socialism (pp. 3-18). London: Verso.
58. Williams, R. (1968/1989). The idea of a common culture. In: R. Gable (Ed.), Resources of hope: Culture, democracy, socialism (pp. 32-38). London: Verso.
59. Williamson, K., & Roberts, J. (2010). Developing and sustaining a sense of place: The role of social information. Library & Information Science Research, 32, 281-287.
60. Woods, B. (1993). Communication, technology and the development of people. London: Routledge.
61. Zaret, D. (2000). Origins of democratic culture: Printing, petitions, and the public sphere in early-modern England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.