Disposable circumcision suture device: Clinical effect and patient satisfaction

Asian Journal of Andrology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 453-456

  Lv, Bo Dong ^a   Zhang, Shi Geng ^b   Zhu, Xuan Wen ^a   Zhang, Jie ^b   Chen, Gang ^b   Chen, Min Fu ^c   Shen, Hong Liang ^d   Pei, Zai Jun ^e   Chen, Zhao Dian ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG CHINESE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Department of Urology People's Hospital of Anji County   (China)

^d Department of Urology Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Deqing County   (China)

^e Department of Urology Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Tongxiang County   (China)

Author keywords

Circumcision; Disposable circumcision suture device; Patient satisfaction; Penis appearance; Pre operative and postoperative pain; Shang ring

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CIRCUMCISION; CIRCUMCISION DEVICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPOSABLE CIRCUMCISION SUTURE DEVICE; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; EDEMA; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INCISION DISRUPTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PHIMOSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREPUTIAL GLAND; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUTURE; WOUND HEALING; ADOLESCENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUTURING METHOD; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHIMOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900478475     PISSN: 1008682X     EISSN: 17457262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.127816     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Corté.-Gonzeáz JR Arratia-Maqueo JA Martëz-Montelongo R Gëz-Guerra LS. Does circumcision affect male's perception of sexual satisfaction̈ Arch Esp Urol 2009; 62: 733-6
2. Auvert B Sobngwi-Tambekou J Cutler E Nieuwoudt M Lissouba P Puren A et al. Effect of male circumcision on the prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus in young men: Results of a randomized controlled trial conducted in Orange Farm South Africa. J Infect Dis 2009; 199: 14-9
3. Rosario IJ Kasabwala K Sadeghi-Nejad H. Circumcision as a strategy to minimize HIV transmission. Curr Urol Rep 2013; 14: 285-90
4. Hayashi Y Kohri K. Circumcision related to urinary tract infections sexually transmitted infections human immunodeficiency virus infections and penile and cervical cancer. Int J Urol 2013; 20: 769-75
5. Larke NL Thomas SL dos Santos Silva I Weiss HA. Male circumcision and penile cancer: Systematic review and meta-Analysis. Cancer Causes Control 2011; 22: 1097-110
6. Morris BJ Gray RH Castellsague X Bosch FX Halperin DT et al. The strong protective effect of circumcision against cancer of the penis Adv Urol 2011; 2011: 812368
7. Bratt JH Zyambo Z. Comparing direct costs of facility-based Shang Ring provision versus a standard surgical technique for voluntary medical male circumcision in Zambia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013; 63: E109-12
8. Xiao EL Ding H Li YQ Wang ZP. Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional circumcision for redundant prepuce or phimosis: Meta analysis. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2013; 19: 935-9
9. Wang R Chen WJ Shi WH Xue YF. Shang Ring sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: Comparative study of 918 cases. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2013; 19: 332-6
10. Yue C Ze-Jun Y Wu KR Su XJ Hu JS et al. A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a ring device versus conventional circumcision. J Urol 2012; 188: 1849-54
11. Li HN Xu J Qu LM. Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: Comparison of clinical effectiveness. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2010; 16: 325-7
12. Yilmaz E Batislam E Basar MM Basar H. Psychological trauma of circumcision in the phallic period could be avoided by using topical steroids Int J Urol 2003; 10: 651-6
13. Goldman R. The psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999; 83 Suppl 1: 93-102
14. Fink KS Carson CC DeVellis RF. Adult circumcision outcomes study: Effect on erectile function penile sensitivity sexual activity and satisfaction. J Urol 2002; 167: 2113-6
15. Masood S Patel HR Himpson RC Palmer JH Mufti GR et al. Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision: Re we informing men correctly?. Urol Int 2005; 75: 62-6
16. Menif K Khaldi A Bouziri A Hamdi A Belhadj S et al. Lidocaine toxicity secondary to local anesthesia administered in the community for elective circumcision. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2011; 30: 359-62
17. Lehr VT Cepeda E Frattarelli DA Thomas R LaMothe J et al. Lidocaine 4% cream compared with lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% or dorsal penile block for circumcision. Am J Perinatol 2005; 22: 231-7
18. Wang L Gao JJ Yuan LG. Compound lidocaine cream in the circumcision of children. Da Lian Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2011; 33: 157-9
19. Millard PS. Circumcision - what's wrong with plastic rings?. S Afr Med J 2012; 102: 126-8
20. Millard PS Fumo A Sabino E. Minimally invasive childhood and adult circumcision. Trop Doct 2012; 42: 23-4
21. Andrew J Schuman MD. Best new products for pediatricians 2009. Contemp Pediatr 2009; 26: 59.