Minimally invasive childhood and adult circumcision

Tropical Doctor

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 23-24

  Millard, Peter S ^a,b   Fumo, Afonso ^a   Sabino, Elis ^a  

^a Ilha de Moc mbique   (Mozambique)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ARTICLE; CIRCUMCISION; GOMCO CIRCUMCISION CLAMP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOB PERFORMANCE; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 84856983973     PISSN: 00494755     EISSN: 17581133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/td.2011.110265     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. World Health Organisation. Manual for Male Circumcision under Local Anaesthesia. Geneva: WHO, 2009
2. Bailey RC, Egesah O, Rosenberg S. Male circumcision for HIV prevention: a prospective study of complications in clinical and traditional settings in Bungoma, Kenya. Bull World Health Organ, 2008;86:669-77
3. World Health Organisation. Manual For Early Infant Male Circumcision Under Local Anaesthesia. Geneva: WHO, 2010
4. Lane V, Vajda P, Subramaniam R. Paediatric sutureless circumcision: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Surg Int, 2010;26:141-4
5. Elmore JM, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ. Sutureless circumcision using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond): appraisal after 18-month experience. Urology, 2007;70:803-6
6. Kaye JD, Kalisvaart JF, Cuda SP, Elmore JM, Cerwinka WH, Kirsch AJ. Sutureless and scalpel-free circumcision – more rapid, less expensive and better?. J Urol, 2010;184(Suppl):1758-62