Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation

Discourse and Communication

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 209-228

  Zappavigna, Michele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Ambient affiliation; computer mediated communication; corpus linguistics; discourse analysis; identity; microblogging; social media; systemic functional linguistics; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900451677     PISSN: 17504813     EISSN: 17504821     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1750481313510816     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Androutsopoulos J.Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication.Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2006;10:419-438.
2. Bateson GSteps to an Ecology of Mind. Aylesbury: Intertext; 1972:.
3. Bednarek MThe Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum; 2010:.
4. Bednarek M.Expressivity and televisual characterization.Language and Literature. 2011;20:3-21.
5. Bednarek MCorpora, Grammar, Text and Discourse. Charles MGroom NJohn S, ed. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins; in press:.
6. Bednarek M,Martin JRNew Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum; 2010:.
7. Benwell B,Stokoe EDiscourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2007:.
8. Bernstein BPedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. rev. edn. London: Taylor & Francis; 2000:.
9. Bizzell PAcademic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1992:222-237.
10. boyd dA Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. Papacharissi Z, ed. New York: Routledge; 2010:39-58.
11. boyd d,Heer J.Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2006IEEE; 2006. 59c.
12. Brown PPoliteness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987:.
13. Bucholtz MStance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Jaffe A, ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2009:146-170.
14. Bucholtz M,Hall K.Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.Discourse Studies. 2005;7:585-614.
15. Campoy JMH,Espinosa JACStyle-shifting in Public: New Perspectives on Stylistic Variation. Philadephia, PA and Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2012:.
16. Coupland JSmall Talk. Harlow: Longman; 2000:.
17. Coupland NStyle: Language Variation and Identity. London: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
18. Eckert PLanguage Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. New York: Wiley; 2000:.
19. Ellison N,boyd dThe Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Dutton WH, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p; 2013:151.
20. Firth JRPapers in Linguistics, 1934-1951. London: Oxford University Press; 1957:.
21. Firth JRThe Tongues of Men [1937] and Speech [1930]. London: Oxford University Press; 1964:.
22. Firth JRSelected Papers of JR Firth, 1952-59. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press; 1968:.
23. Gilpin DRThe Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. Papacharissi Z, ed. New York: Routledge; 2010:232-250.
24. Halliday MAKLanguage as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press; 1978:.
25. Halliday MAK,Matthiessen CMAn Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold; 2004:.
26. Holmes J.Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace.Discourse Studies. 2000;2:159-185.
27. Hyland KCommonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang; 2009:25-52.
28. Jaffe AStance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
29. Knight NNew Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. Bednarek MMartin JR, ed. London and New York: Continuum; 2010:35-58.
30. Lopez LK.The radical act of 'mommy blogging': Redefining motherhood through the blogosphere.New Media & Society. 2009;11:729-747.
31. Malinowski BCommunication in Face-to-face Interaction. Laver JHutcheson S, ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1972:146-152.
32. Martin JREvaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Hunston SThompson G, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:142-175.
33. Martin JRResearch and Practice in Professional Discourse. Candlin Christopher N, ed. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press; 2002:187-227.
34. Martin JR.Realisation, instantiation and individuation: Some thoughts on identity in youth justice conferencing.DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada. 2009;25:549-583.
35. Martin JR,Rose DGenre Relations: Mapping Culture. London and Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub; 2008:.
36. Martin JR,White PRRThe Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005:.
37. Martin JR,Zappavigna M.Youth justice conferencing as ceremonial redress.International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse. in press;:.
38. Martin JR,Zappavigna M,Dwyer P,Cléirigh C.Users in uses of language: Embodied identity in youth justice conferencing.Text and Talk. 2013;33:467-496.
39. Marwick A.To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter.Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2011;17:139-158.
40. Oulasvirta A,Lehtonen E,Kurvinen E, et al.Making the ordinary visible in microblogs.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2010;14:237-249.
41. Page R.The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags.Discourse & Communication. 2012;6:181-201.
42. Papacharissi ZA Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge; 2010:.
43. Polanyi MThe Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith; 1983:.
44. Prior P. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Meeting; 2003Arlington, VA; 2003.
45. Schnoebelen T.Do you smile with your nose? Stylistic variation in Twitter emoticons.University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. 2012;18:117-125.
46. Seargeant P,Tagg CLanguage and Social Media: Communication and Community Online. London: Palgrave; in press:.
47. Simões A.Lingua-Identify-0.29. 2010;:.
48. Spencer-Oatey H.Theories of identity and the analysis of face.Journal of Pragmatics. 2007;39:639-656.
49. Stenglin MMultimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in the Contexts of Education. London: Continuum; 2008:50-66.
50. Sunderland J.'Parenting' or 'mothering'? The case of modern childcare magazines.Discourse & Society. 2006;17:503-528.
51. Tajfel H.Experiments in intergroup discrimination.Scientific American. 1970;223:96-102.
52. Thurlow C,Mroczek KDigital Discourse: Language in the New Media. New York: Oxford University Press USA; 2011:.
53. Trant J.Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework.Journal of Digital Information. 2009;10:1-44.
54. Urban Dictionary (2011) Urban Word of the Day, 9August. Available at: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=humblebrag.
55. Wenger ECommunities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
56. Wittels HHumblebrag: The Art of False Modesty. New York: Grand Central Publishing; 2012:.
57. Zappavigna M.Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter.New Media & Society. 2011;13:788-806.
58. Zappavigna MDiscourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum; 2012:.
59. Zappavigna MTacit Knowledge and Spoken Discourse. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic; 2013:.
60. Zappavigna MThe Language of Social Media: Communication and Community on the Internet. Seargeant PTagg C, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; in press:.
61. Zappavigna M,Dwyer P,Martin JRQuestioning Linguistics. Mahboob AKnight N, ed. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2008:103-117.
62. Zhao SNew Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. Bednarek MMartin J, ed. London: Continuum; 2010:195-218.
63. Zhao SLearning through multimedia interaction: The construal of primary social science knowledge in web-based digital learning materials. University of Sydney; 2011:.
64. Zimmerman DHIdentities in Talk. Antaki CWiddicombe S, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998:87-106.