Assessment of the impact of dimensionality reduction methods on information classes and classifiers for hyperspectral image classification by multiple classifier system

Advances in Space Research

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1720-1734

  Damodaran, Bharath Bhushan ^a   Nidamanuri, Rama Rao ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Dimensionality reduction; Hyperspectral image; Land cover classification; Multiple classifier system; Remote sensing; Supervised classification

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFIERS; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTROSCOPY; SUPERVISED LEARNING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

CLASSIFICATION RESULTS; COMBINATION OF CLASSIFIERS; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION METHOD; GENERALIZATION CAPABILITY; LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER SYSTEMS; SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84900440899     PISSN: 02731177     EISSN: 18791948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2013.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. F.S. Al-Ahmadi, and A.S. Hames Comparison of four classification methods to extract land use and land cover from raw satellite images for some remote arid areas, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Earth Sci. 20 2009 167 191
2. U. Amato, R.M. Cavalli, A. Palombo, S. Pignatti, and F. Santini Experimental approach to the selection of the components in the minimum noise fraction IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47 2009 153 160
3. L.M. Bruce, C.H. Koger, and J. Li Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral data using discrete wavelet transform feature extraction IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 40 2002 2331 2338
4. X. Ceamanos, B. Waske, J.A. Benediktsson, J. Chanussot, M. Fauvel, and J.R. Sveinsson A classifier ensemble based on fusion of support vector machines for classifying hyperspectral data Int. J. Image Data Fusion 1 2010 293 307
5. C.I. Chang Orthogonal subspace projection (OSP) revisited: a comprehensive study and analysis IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43 2005 502 518
6. C.C. Chang, and C.J. Lin LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2 2011 27:1 27:27
7. G. Chen, and S.E. Qian Evaluation and comparison of dimensionality reduction methods and band selection Can. J. Remote Sens. 34 2008 26 36
8. A. Cheriyadat, and L.M. Bruce Why principal component analysis is not an appropriate feature extraction method for hyperspectral data IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. 2003 6 2003 3420 3422
9. L. Clemmensen, M. Hansen, and B. Ersbøll A comparison of dimension reduction methods with application to multi-spectral images of sand used in concrete Mach. Vis. Appl. 21 2010 959 968
10. Q. Du, H. Ren, and C.I. Chang A comparative study for orthogonal subspace projection and constrained energy minimization IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 41 2003 1525 1529
11. M. Fauvel, J. Chanussot, and J.A. Benediktsson Kernel principal component analysis for the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data over urban areas EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 1-15 2009 2009
12. M. Fauvel, J. Chanussot, and J.A. Benediktsson A Spatial-Spectral Kernel Based Approach for the Classification of Remote Sensing Images Pattern Recognition 45 2012 281 392
13. G.M. Foody Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment Remote Sens. Environ. 80 2002 185 201
14. G. Giacinto, F. Roli, and G. Vernazza Comparison and combination of statistical and neural network algorithms for remote-sensing Neurocomputation in Remote Sensing Data Analysis 1977 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany 117 124
15. J.C. Granahan, and J.N. Sweet An evaluation of atmospheric correction techniques using the spectral similarity scale IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. 5 2001 2022 2024
16. A.A. Green, M. Berman, P. Switzer, and M.D. Craig A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 26 1988 65 74
17. J.C. Harsanyi, and C.I. Chang Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 32 1994 779 785
18. M. Herold, M.E. Gardner, and D.A. Roberts Spectral resolution requirements for mapping urban areas IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 41 2003 1907 1919
19. R. Hueso, J. Legarreta, J.F. Rojas, J. Peralta, S. Pérez-Hoyos, T. Del Río-Gaztelurrutia, and A. Sánchez-Lavega The planetary laboratory for image analysis (PLIA) Adv. Space Res. 46 2010 1120 1138
20. L.O. Jimenez, and D.A. Landgrebe Supervised classification in high-dimensional space: geometrical, statistical, and asymptotical properties of multivariate data IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 28 1998 39 54
21. C. Joshi, J.De. Leeuw, A.K. Skidmore, I.C. van Duren, and H. Van Oosten Remotely sensed estimation of forest canopy density: a comparison of the performance of four methods Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 8 2006 84 95
22. S. Kaewpijit, J. Le Moigne, and T. El-Ghazawi Automatic reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet spectral analysis IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 41 2003 863 871
23. F.A. Kruse, A.B. Lefkoff, J.W. Boardman, K.B. Heidebrecht, A.T. Shapiro, P.J. Barloon, and A.F.H. Goetz The spectral image processing system (SIPS) - interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data Remote Sens. Environ. 44 1993 145 163
24. D. Lu, and Q. Weng A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance Int. J. Remote Sens. 28 2007 823 870
25. S. Lu, K. Oki, Y. Shimizu, and K. Omasa Comparison between several feature extraction/classification methods for mapping complicated agricultural land use patches using airborne hyperspectral data Int. J. Remote Sens. 28 2007 963 984
26. D. Lu, M. Batistella, M. Evaristo, de, and E. Moran A comparative study of Landsat TM and SPOT HRG images for vegetation classification in the Brazilian Amazon Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens. 74 2008 311 321
27. D. Lu, G. Li, E. Moran, L. Dutra, and M. Batistella A comparison of multisensor integration methods for land cover classification in the Brazilian Amazon GISci. Remote Sens. 48 2011 345 370
28. D. Manolakis, D. Marden, and G.A. Shaw Hyperspectral image processing for automatic target detection applications Lincoln Lab. J. 14 2003 79 115
29. Marpu, P.R.; Gamba, P.; Niemeyer, I.; 2009. Hyperspectral data classification using an ensemble of class-dependent neural networks. In: First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing, pp. 1-4.
30. S. Moussaoui, H. Hauksdóttir, F. Schmidt, C. Jutten, J. Chanussot, D. Brie, S. Douté, and J.A. Benediktsson On the decomposition of Mars hyperspectral data by ICA and Bayesian positive source separation Neurocomputing 71 2008 2194 2208
31. R.R. Nidamanuri, and B. Zbell Use of field reflectance data for crop mapping using airborne hyperspectral image ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 66 2011 683 691
32. N.R. Rao, P.K. Garg, and S.K. Ghosh Development of an agricultural crops spectral library and classification of crops at cultivar level using hyperspectral data Precision Agric. 8 2007 173 185
33. Ren, H.; Chang, C.I.; 2000. A target constrained interference-minimized filter for subpixel target detection in hyperspectral imagery. In: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp. 1545-1547.
34. Robila, S.A.; Gershman, A.; 2005. Spectral matching accuracy in processing hyperspectral data. In: IEEE International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, pp. 163-166.
35. G. Russell, and K.G. Congalton Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data 2008 CRC Press
36. P.K. Srivastava, D. Han, M.A. Rico-Ramirez, M. Bray, and T. Islam Selection of classification techniques for land use/land cover change investigation Adv. Space Res. 50 2012 1250 1265
37. B.W. Szuster, Q. Chen, and M. Borger A comparison of classification techniques to support land cover and land use analysis in tropical coastal zones Appl. Geography 31 2011 525 532
38. K.E. Themelis, F. Schmidt, O. Sykioti, A.A. Rontogiannis, K.D. Koutroumbas, and I.A. Daglis On the unmixing of MEx/OMEGA hyperspectral data Planet. Space Sci. 68 2012 34 41
39. P.S. Thenkabail, E.A. Enclona, M.S. Ashton, and B. Van Der Meer Accuracy assessments of hyperspectral waveband performance for vegetation analysis applications Remote Sens. Environ. 91 2004 354 376
40. J. Wang, and C. Chang Independent component analysis-based dimensionality reduction with applications in hyperspectral image analysis IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44 2006 1586 1600
41. H. Yang, Q. Du, and B. Ma Decision fusion on supervised and unsupervised classifiers for hyperspectral imagery IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 7 2010 875 879
42. J.M. Yang, B.C. Kuo, P.T. Yu, and C.H. Chuang A dynamic subspace method for hyperspectral image classification IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 48 2010 2840 2853