The behavioral outcomes of a technology-supported leisure activity in people with dementia

Technology and Disability

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 263-273

  Nijhof, N ^a,d   Van Hoof, J ^b   Van Rijn, H ^c   Van Gemert Pijnen, J E W C ^d  

^a PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Germany)

^b FONTYS UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c De Waag Centre for Forensic Psychiatry   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alzheimer; behavioral outcomes; nursing home; reminiscence; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DAY CARE; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEISURE; MALE; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; NURSING HOME; OSHKOSH SOCIAL BEHAVIOR CODING SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 84900433296     PISSN: 10554181     EISSN: 1878643X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-140398     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Wimo A, Prince M. World Alzheimer Report 2010. London: Alzheimers Disease International, 2010.
2. Bharucha AJ, Anand V, Forlizzi J, Dew MA, Reynoalds CF, Stevens S, et al. Intelligent Assistive Technology Applications to Dementia Care: Current Capabilities, Limitations and Future Challenges. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2009;17(2):88-104. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318187dde5.
3. Bamford C, Bruce E. Defining the outcomes of community care: The perspectives of older people with dementia and their carers. Ageing and Society. 2000;20(5):543-70. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X99007898.
4. Ott BR, Tate CA, Gordon NM, Heindel WC. Gender differences in the behavioral manifestations of Alzheimers disease. Journal of the Am erican Geriatrics Society. 1996;44(5):583-7.
5. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975; 12(3):189-98.
6. Van der Roest HG, Meiland FJ, Comijs HC, D erksen E, Jansen AP, Van Hout HP, et al. What do community-dwelling people with dementia need A survey of those who are known to care and welfare services. International Psychogeriatrics. 2009;21(5):949-65. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209990147.
7. Sterns HL, Camp CJ. Applied gerontology. Applied Psychology. 1998;47(2):175-98. doi 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1998. tb00020.x.
8. Buettner LL, Ferrario J. Therapeutic recreation-nursing team: A therapeutic intervention for nursing home residents with dementia: Therapeutic recreation news; 1997/1998 [Cited 2012 June 6]. Available from: Http://www.recreationtherapy. com/re-de m.htm.
9. Koger SM, Chapin K, Brotons M. Is music therapy an effective intervention for dementia A meta-analytic review of literature. Journal of Music Therapy. 1999;36(1):2-15. doi 10. 10 93/jmt/36.1.2.
10. Schreiner A, Yamamoto E, Shiotani H. Positive affect among nursing home residents with Alzheimers dementia: The effect of recreational activity. Aging and Mental Health. 2005; 9(2) :129-34. doi 10.1080/13607860412331336841.
11. Dupuis SL, Whyte C, Carson J, Sadler L, Meschino L. Liberating leisure from therapy. Leisure Studies Association annual conference; Leeds, England, 2010.
12. Woods B, Spector AE, Jon es CA, Orrell M, Davies SP. Reminiscence therapy for dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005;18(2). doi 10.1002/14651858. CD001120.pub2.
13. Astell AJ Ellis M Alm N Dye J Campbell J Gowans G. Facilitating communication in dementia with multimedia technology. Brain and language. 2004 33 1 304-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.043.
14. Theng YL, Bin Dahlan A, Akmal ML, Myint TZ. An exploratory study on senior citizensperceptions of the Nintendo Wii: The case of Singapore. Icreat; April 22-26; Singapore: ACM; 2009.
15. Van Rijn H, Van Hoof J, Stap pers PJ. Designing leisure products for people with dementia: Devloping " the Chitchatters" game. American Journal of Alzheimers Disease & Other Dementias. 2010;25(1):74-89. doi: 10.1177/1533317509333 039.
16. Koene M. Vragenderwijs Blauw deel 2 Grou, The Netherlands [Cited 2012 June 6]. Available from: Http://www.michel koene.333xVragenderwijs-Blauw-deel-2. htm.
17. Catwell L, Sheikh A. PLoS Med. Evaluating eHealth Interventions: The Need for Continuous Systemic Evaluation. 2009;6(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed. 1000126.
18. Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas LK. An evaluation frame work for health information systems: Human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2008;77(6):386-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011.
19. Pagliari C. Design and evaluation in eHealth: Challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2007;9(2). doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e15.
20. Kaufman D, RobertsWD, Merrill J, Lai TY, S. B. Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation. Nurse Researcher. 2006; 55(1):s37-42. doi: 10.1097/00006199-2006030 01-00007.
21. Van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, J. T, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: A literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 20 03;10(3):235-43. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1094.
22. Lunsman M, McFadden SH, Andel R, editors. Comparative analysis and interrater reliability of the Oshkosh Social Behaviors Scale for dementia patients. Gero ntological Society of America; 2007; San Francisco, California.
23. McFadden SH, Lunsman M. Continuity in the midst of change: Behaviors of residents relocated from a nursing home environment to small households. American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias. 2010;25(1):51-7. doi: 10.1177/1533317508320088.
24. Nielsen J. Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgen Kaufmann; 1993.
25. Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2004;37(1):56-76. doi: 10.1177/1533317508320088.
26. Efron B. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Annals of Statistics. 1979;7(1):1-26.
27. Edgington ES. Randomization tests. New York 1996.
28. Good P. Permutation tests: A practical guide for resampling methods for testing hypotheses New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
29. Linden A, Adams JL, Roberts N. Evaluating disease managemen t program effectiveness: An introduction to the bootstrap technique. Disease management & health outcomes. 2005; 13(3):159-67. doi: 10.2165/00115677-200513030- 00002.
30. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: Application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2005;5(37).
31. Teknomo K. Bootstrap Sampling Numerical Example 2006 [Cited 2012 June 20]. Available from: Http://people.revoledu. com/kardi/tutorial/Bootstrap/ examples.htm.
32. Lauriks S, Reinersmann A, Van der Roest HG, Meiland FJ, Davies RJ, Moelaert F, et al. Review of ICT based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. Aging Research Reviews. 2007;6(3):223-46. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2007. 07.002.
33. Cahill S, Begley E, Faulkner JP, Hagen I. " It gives me a sense of independence"-Findings from Ireland on the use and usefulness of assistive technology for people with dementia. Technology and Disability. 2007;19(2-3):133-42.
34. Cahill S, Macijauskiene J, Nygåd AM, Faulkner JP, Hagen I. Technology in dementia care. Technology and Disability. 2007;19(2-3):55-60.
35. Nijhof N, Van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC, Dohmen D, Seydel ER. Dementie en technologie. Een studie naar toepassingen Van techniek in De zorg voor mensen met dementie en hun mantelzorgers. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie. 2009;40 (3):113-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03079573.
36. Duff P, Dolphin C. Cost-benefit analysis of assisitive technology to support independence for people with dementia-Part 2: Results from employing the ENABLE cost-benefit model in practice. Technology and Disability. 2007;19(2-3):79-90.
37. Topo P. Technology studies to meet the needs of people with dementia and their caregiv ers. A literature review. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2009;28 (1):5-37. doi: 10.1177/0733464808324019.
38. Orpwood R, Gibbs C, Adlam T, Faulkner R,Meegahawatte D. The design of sma rt homes for people with dementia-user interface aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2005;4(2):156-64. doi: 10.1007/s10209-005-0120-7.
39. Maetzel A, Strand V, Tugwell P,Wells G, Bombardier C. Economic comparison of Leflunomide and Methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20(1):61-70. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220010-00006.
40. Per is F,Martinez E, Badia X, Brosa M. Iatrogenic cost factors incorporating mild and moderate adverse events in the economic comparison of Aceclofenac and other NSAIDs. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(7):779-90. doi: 10 .2165/00019053-200119070-00006.
41. Neymark N, Adriaenssen I, Gorlia T, Caleo S, Bolla M, Brochon D. Cost-effectiveness of the addition of early hormonal therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer: Results d ecisively determined by the cut-off time point chosen for the analysis. European Journal of Cancer. 2001;37 (14):1768-74.
42. Chen M, Kianifard F. A nonparametric procedure associated with a clinic ally meaningful efficacy measure. Biostatistics. 2000;1(3):293-8. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.293.
43. Bredell H, Crookes RL, Heynes dPA, Schoub BD, Morris L. Molecular investigation of two possible cases of accidental HIV-1 transmission in South Africa. AIDS Research Human Retroviruses. 2003;19(7):613-7. doi: 10.1089/088922203322230987.
44. Henderson AR. The bootstrap: A technique for data-driven statistics. Using computer intensive analyses to explore experimental data. Clinica Chimica Acta 2005;359 (1-2):1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2005.04.002.