Ecological meta-networks integrate spatial and temporal dynamics of plant-bumble bee interactions

Oikos

Volumn 123, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 714-720

  Devoto, Mariano ^a,b   Bailey, Sallie ^a   Memmott, Jane ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^c FORESTRY COMMISSION   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BEE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; FOOD AVAILABILITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PATCH SIZE; PLANT COMMUNITY; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; POPULATION DECLINE; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPECIES RICHNESS; SURVIVAL; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

BOMBUS (GENUS);

EID: 84900392340     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.01251.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ahrné K. et al. 2009. Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) along a gradient of increasing urbanization. - PLoS ONE 4 : e5574.
2. Alarcón R. et al. 2008. Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant-pollinator interaction network. - Oikos 117 : 1796 - 1807.
3. Anonymous 1998. Native woodlands of Scotland. - Forestry Commission.
4. Anonymous 2000. Forests for Scotland. The Scottish forestry strategy. - Scottish Executive.
5. Aubin I. et al. 2008. Can plantations develop understory biological and physical attributes of naturally regenerated forests? - Biol. Conserv. 141 : 2461 - 2476.
6. Debinski D. E. and Holt R. D. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. - Conserv. Biol. 14 : 342 - 355.
7. Devoto M. et al. 2012. Understanding and planning ecological restoration of plant-pollinator networks. - Ecol. Lett. 15 : 319 - 328.
8. Fitter A. H. and Fitter R. S. R. 2002. Rapid changes in lowering time in British plants. - Science 296 : 1689 - 1691.
9. Fox L. R. and Morrow P. A. 1981. Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? - Science 211 : 887 - 893.
10. Gibson R. H. et al. 2011. Sampling method influences the structure of plant-pollinator networks. - Oikos 120 : 822 - 831.
11. Gilpin M. E. and Hanski I. A. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. - Academic Press.
12. Gimingham C. H. 1977. Status of pinewoods in British ecosystems. - In: Bunce R. G. H. and Jeffers J. N. R. (eds), Native pinewoods of Scotland : proceedings of Aviemore symposium, 1975. ITE - Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, pp. 1 - 4.
13. Gotelli N. J. and Graves G. R. 1996. Null models in ecology. - Smithsonian Inst. Press.
14. Goulson D. 2003. Bumblebees: behaviour and ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
15. Goulson D. and Stout J. C. 2001. Homing ability of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. - Apidologie 32 : 105 - 111.
16. Goulson D. et al. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53 : 191 - 208.
17. Gower J. C. 1975. Generalized Procrustes analysis. - Psychometrika 40 : 33 - 51.
18. Hatfield R. G. and LeBuhn G. 2007. Patch and landscape factors shape community assemblage of bumble bees, Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), in montane meadows. - Biol. Conserv. 139 : 150 - 158.
19. Heard M. S. et al. 2007. Landscape context not patch size determines bumble-bee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes. - Biol. Lett. 3 : 638 - 641.
20. Hegland S. J. et al. 2009. How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? - Ecol. Lett. 12 : 184 - 195.
21. Heinrich B. 1976. Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. - Ecology 57 : 874 - 889.
22. Heinrich B. 1979. Bumblebee economics. - Harvard Univ. Press.
23. Humphrey J. W. et al. 1999. Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests. - For. Ecol. Manage. 113 : 11 - 21.
24. Hunter F. A. 1977. Ecology of pinewood beetles. - In: Bunce R. G. H. and Jeffers J. N. R. (eds), Native pinewoods of Scotland : proceedings of Aviemore symposium, 1975. Inst. of Terrestrial Ecology, pp. 42 - 55.
25. Jackson D. A. 1995. PROTEST: a procrustean randomization test of community environment concordance. - Ecoscience 2 : 297 - 303.
26. Jordán F. and Osváth G. 2009. The sensitivity of food web topology to temporal data aggregation. - Ecol. Modell. 220 : 3141 - 3146.
27. Klein A.-M. et al. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. - Proc. R. Soc. B 274 : 303 - 313.
28. Kosior A. et al. 2007. The decline of the bumble bees and cuckoo bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombini) of western and central Europe. - Oryx 41 : 79 - 88.
29. Kwaiser K. S. and Hendrix S. D. 2008. Diversity and abundance of bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in native and ruderal grasslands of agriculturally dominated landscapes. - Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 124 : 200 - 204.
30. Leibold M. A. et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. - Ecol. Lett. 7 : 601 - 613.
31. McVean D. N. 1963. Ecology of Scots pine in the Scottish Highlands. - J. Ecol. 51 : 671 - 686.
32. Medan D. et al. 2006. Measuring generalization and connectance in temperate, long-lasting systems. - In: Waser N. M. and Ollerton J. (eds), Plant-pollinator interactions. From specialization to generalization. Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 245 - 259.
33. Memmott J. 1999. The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. - Ecol. Lett. 2 : 276 - 280.
34. Memmott J. et al. 2007. Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. - Ecol. Lett. 10 : 710 - 717.
35. Oksanen J. et al. 2010. vegan: community ecology package. R package ver. 1.17-2.
36. Peres-Neto P. R. and Jackson D. A. 2001. How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. - Oecologia 129 : 169 - 178.
37. Peterken G. F. 1996. Natural woodland. Ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
38. Peterken G. F. et al. 1992. Old-growth conservation within British Upland conifer plantations. - Forestry 65 : 127 - 144.
39. Pywell R. F. et al. 2005. Providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes. - Biol. Conserv. 121 : 479 - 494.
40. Ranta E. and Lundberg H. 1981. Resource utilization by bumblebee queens, workers and males in a subarctic area. - Holarct. Ecol. 4 : 145 - 154.
41. Ranta E. and Vepsäläinen K. 1981. Why are there so many species? Spatio-temporal heterogeneity and northern bumblebee communities. - Oikos 36 : 28 - 34.
42. Ranta E. and Tiainen M. 1982. Structure in seven bumblebee communities in eastern Finland in relation to resource availability. - Holarct. Ecol. 5 : 48 - 54.
43. Ranta E. et al. 1981. Patterns of resource utilization in two Fennoscandian bumblebee communities. - Oikos 36 : 1 - 11.
44. Rundlöf M. et al. 2008. Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees. - Biol. Conserv. 141 : 417 - 426.
45. Schoener T. W. 1979. Generality of the size-distance relation in models of optimal feeding. - Am. Nat. 114 : 902 - 914.
46. Steffan-Dewenter I. et al. 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. - Ecology 83 : 1421 - 1432.
47. Stenström M. and Bergman P. 1998. Bumblebees at an Alpine site in northern Sweden: temporal development, population size and plant utilization. - Ecography 21 : 306 - 316.
48. Steven H. M. and Carlisle A. 1959. The native pinewoods of Scotland. - Oliver and Boyd.
49. ter Braak C. J. F. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. - Vegetatio 69 : 69 - 77.
50. ter Braak C. J. F. and Verdonschot P. F. M. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. - Aquat. Sci. 57 : 255 - 289.
51. Vázquez D. P. and Aizen M. A. 2004. Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant-pollinator interactions. - Ecology 85 : 1251 - 1257.
52. Westphal C. et al. 2008. Measuring bee diversity in different european habitats and biogeographical regions. - Ecol. Monogr. 78 : 653 - 671.
53. Wilson D. S. 1992. Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. - Ecology 73 : 1984 - 2000.
54. Williams P. H. 1982. The distribution and decline of British bumble bees (Bombus Latr.). - J. Apicult. Res. 21 : 236 - 245.
55. Williams P. H. and Osborne J. L. 2009. Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. - Apidologie 40 : 367 - 387.
56. Zurbuchen A. et al. 2010. Maximum foraging ranges in solitary bees: only few individuals have the capability to cover long foraging distances. - Biol. Conserv. 143 : 669 - 676.