Challenges for dataset search

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8421 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2014, Pages 1-15

  Maier, David ^a   Megler, V M ^a   Tufte, Kristin ^a  

^a Portland State University   (United States)

Author keywords

data discovery; querying scientific data; ranked search

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

DATA DISCOVERY; EFFECTIVE TOOL; FEATURE-BASED; RANKED SEARCH; SCIENTIFIC DATA; SEARCH SERVICES;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84900327505     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05810-8_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Ageev, M., et al.: Find it if you can: A game for modeling different types of web search success using interaction data. In: Proceedings of SIGIR (2011)
2. Aula, A., et al.: How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? In: Proc. of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 35-44 (2010)
3. Bruno, N., et al.: Top-k selection queries over relational databases: Mapping strategies and performance evaluation. ACM Trans. Database Syst. TODS 27(2), 153-187 (2002)
4. Carey, M.J., Kossmann, D.: On saying "enough already!" in SQL. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 26(2), 219-230 (1997)
5. Chaudhuri, S., et al.: Integrating DB and IR technologies: What is the sound of one hand clapping. In: CIDR 2005, pp. 1-12 (2005)
6. Gaasterland, T.: Cooperative answering through controlled query relaxation. IEEE Expert 12(5), 48-59 (1997)
7. Hellerstein, J.M., Pfeffer, A.: The RD-tree: An index structure for sets. University of Wisconsin-Madison (1994).
8. Ilyas, I.F., et al.: A survey of top-k query processing techniques in relational database systems. ACM Comput. Surv. CSUR. 40(4), 11 (2008)
9. Jansen, B.J., et al.: Real life, real users, and real needs: A study and analysis of user queries on the web. Inf. Process. Manag. 36(2), 207-227 (2000)
10. Koposov, S., Bartunov, O.: Q3C, Quad Tree Cube: The new sky-indexing concept for huge astronomical catalogues and its realization for main astronomical queries (cone search and Xmatch) in open source database PostgreSQL. In: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV. pp. 735-738 (2006)
11. Kunszt, P., et al.: The indexing of the SDSS science archive. Astron. Data Anal. Softw. Syst. 216 (2000)
12. Lemson, G., et al.: Implementing a general spatial indexing library for relational databases of large numerical simulations. Scientific and Statistical Database Management, 509-526 (2011)
13. Megler, V.M.: Ranked Similarity Search of Scientific Datasets: An Information Retrieval Approach (PhD Dissertation in preparation) (2014)
14. Megler, V.M.: Taming the metadata mess. IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW), pp. 286-289. IEEE Computer Society, Brisbane (2013)
15. Megler, V.M., Maier, D.: Finding haystacks with needles: Ranked search for data using geospatial and temporal characteristics. In: Bayard Cushing, J., French, J., Bowers, S. (eds.) SSDBM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6809, pp. 55-72. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
16. Singh, G., et al.: A metadata catalog service for data intensive applications. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, p. 33 (2003)
17. Wang, X., et al.: Liferaft: Data-driven, batch processing for the exploration of scientific databases. In: CIDR (2009)