From knowledge management system to e-learning tool

Intelligent Learning Infrastructure for Knowledge Intensive Organizations: A Semantic Web Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 81-104

  Lê, Tang Ho ^a   Moghrabi, Chadia ^a   Tivendell, John ^a   Hachey, Johanne ^a   Roy, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONCTON   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900200860     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-503-0.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Annett, J. (2000). Theoretical and pragmatic influences on task analysis methods. In J.M. Scraagen, S.F. Chipman, & V.L. Shalin, (Eds), Cognitive task analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Barnard, P., & May, J. (1999). Representing cognitive activity in complex tasks. Human- Computer Interaction, 14, 93-158.
3. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Drucker, P.F., (1993). The post-capitalist society. HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
5. ERCIM, Multiple authors in research challenges and perspectives of the Semantic Web, Report from the Joint European Commission and National Science Foundation, Euzenat, J. (Ed.), October 3-5, 2001, Sophia Antipolis, France, http://www.ercim.org/EU-NSF/semweb.html.
6. Duval, E., Hodgins, W., Rehak, D., & Robson, R., (2003). Introduction. Learning Objects. 2003 Symposium, Honolulu, HI.
7. Gagné, R., Bridggs, L., & Wager, W. (1998). Principles of instructional design. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College, Publishers.
8. Gordon, S.E., & Gill, R.T. (1997). Cognitive task analysis. In C. Zsambok, & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 131-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Howell, W.C., & Cooke, N. J.(1989). Training the human information processor: A review of cognitive models. In I.L. Goldstein, & Associates (Eds.)Training and development in organizations (pp. 121-182). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., & Wilson, B.G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
11. Lassila, O., & McGuinness, D.L. (2001). The role of frame-based representation on the Semantic Web. In Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 5(2001-03-07, 1403-2031) (Printed version), (1403-204X) (Electronic version).
12. Lê, T.H., (1998). Defining a common framework for teaching sessions. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE '98 Global Education on The Net), Vol. 1, October, 1998, (pp. 567-575), Pékin, China.
13. Lê, T.H., & Nguyen, T.H. (2001). Toward a universal knowledge management: Using ontology approach with methods and tools. In Proceedings of the Fifth World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics (SCI-2001), Orlando, FL, (pp. 79-83).
14. Lê, T.H., & Lamontagne, L. (2002). Building organizational memories using multi-dimensional knowledge networks. In R. D.-K., & N. Matta (Eds.)Knowledge management and organizational memories, (pp. 203-212). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Lê, T.H., & Lamontagne, L. (2003). A knowledge management tool for a collaborative authoring project. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS-2003), Angers, France.
16. Legendre, R. (1993). Dictionnaire actuel de l'éducation. Guérin, Montréal.
17. Lethbridge, T.C., & Laganière, R. (2001). Object-oriented software engineering: Practical software development using UML and Java. USA: McGraw-Hill.
18. McGuinness, D.L. (2000). Conceptual modeling for distributed ontology environments. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Conceptual Structures Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000), Darmstadt, Germany.
19. McGuinness, D.L., Fikes, R., Rice, J., & Wilder, S., (2000). An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2000), Breckenridge, CO.
20. Miller Eric, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead WWW2002. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/2002/Talks/www2002-w3ct-swintro-em/.
21. Moghrabi, C., & Boitet, C. (1998a). Using GETA's MT /NLP resources as an expert model in an intelligent tutoring system. In Proceedings, International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (ELRA), Granada, Spain, (Vol. 2, pp. 1235-1241).
22. Moghrabi, C., & Boitet, C. (1998b). Using language resources in an intelligent tutoring system for French. In Proceedings from the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL 98), Montreal, (Vol. 3, pp. 886-891).
23. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
24. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Noy, N., & McGuinness, D.L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. (technical report: SMI-2001-0880), Stanford Medical Informatics.
26. Palmer, S. (2001). The Semantic Web: An introduction. Retrieved from http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/#whatIsSw
27. Reigeluth, C. (1992). Elaborating the elaboration theory. Educational Technology Research & Development, 40(3), 80-86.
28. Sowa, J.F. (2000). Knowledge representation. CA: Brooks/Cole.
29. Spek, R., & Hoog, R. (1998). Methods and techniques for knowledge management. In Proceedings of The Fourth World Congress on Expert Systems, (tutorial document), Mexico.
30. Wiig, K.M. (1993). Knowledge management foundations. Arlington, TX: Schema Press, Ltd.
31. Wiley, D.A. (Ed.) (2000). The instructional use of learning objects (online version).
32. Woelk, D. (2002). E-learning, Semantic Web services and competency ontologies. University of Austin in Texas, Digital Media Collaboratory. Retrieved from http://dmc.ic2.org/publications.php
33. Woelk, D., & Lefrere, P. (2002). Technology for performance-based lifelong learning. ICCE 2002, 92-96.