Representing cognitive activity in complex tasks

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 93-158

  Barnard, Philip J ^a   May, Jon ^b  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; EXPERT SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

INTERACTING COGNITIVE SYSTEM PRODUCTION-RULE EXPERT SYSTEMS (ICSPERT); INTERACTING COGNITIVE SYSTEMS (ICS);

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0032686620     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.1999.9667267     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson, J. R., & Skwarecki, E. (1986). The automated tutoring of introductory computer programming. Communications of the ACM, 29, 842-849.
2. Barnard, P. J. (1985). Interacting cognitive subsystems: A psycholinguistic approach to short term memory. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (pp. 197-258). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Barnard, P. J. (1987). Cognitive resources and the learning of dialogues. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought (pp. 112-128). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Barnard, P. (1999). Interacting cognitive subsystems: Modelling working memory phenomena within a multi-processor architecture. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 298-339). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Barnard, P. J., Bernsen, N. O., Coutaz, J., Darzentas J., Faconti, G., Hammond, N. H., Harrison, M. D., Jørgensen, A. H., Löwgren, J., May, J., & Young, R. M. (1995). Assaying Means of Design Expression for Users and Systems. AMODEUS-2 project final report (Technical Report D13). Brussels, Belgium: CEC DG XIII. Available: ftp://ftp.mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk/pub/amodeus/deliverables/dl3.ps
6. Barnard, P. J., Blandford, A. E., & May J. (1992). Documentation accompanying AMODEUS Deliverable 19. Brussels, Belgium: CEC DG XIII.
7. Barnard P. J., Coutaz, J., Hammond, N., Harrison, M., Jørgensen, A. MacLean, A., & Young, R. M. (1992). AMODEUS: Final report (Technical Report D23). Brussels, Belgium: CEC.
8. Barnard, P., Grudin, J., & MacLean, A. (1989). Developing a science base for the naming of computer commands. In J. B. Long & A. Whitefield (Eds.), Cognitive ergonomics and human computer interaction (pp. 95-133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Barnard, P. J., MacLean, A., & Hammond, N. V. (1984). User representations of ordered sequences of command operations. Proceedings of Interact'84: First IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 434-438. London: IEE.
10. Barnard, P. J., & May, J. (1993). Cognitive modelling for user requirements. In P. F. Byerley, P. J. Barnard, & J. May (Eds.), Computers, communication and usability: Design issues, research and methods for integrated services (pp. 101-146). Amsterdam: Elsevier
11. Barnard, P. J., & May, J. (1995). Interactions with advanced graphical interfaces and the deployment of latent human knowledge. In F. Paternó (Ed.), Eurographics workshop on the design, specification and verification of interactive systems (pp. 15-48). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Barnard, P. J., May, J., & Salber, D. (1996). Deixis and points of view in media spaces: An empirical gesture. Behaviour and Information Technology, 15, 37-50.
13. Barnard, P. J., & Teasdale, J. (1991). Interacting cognitive subsystems: A systemic approach to cognitive affective interaction and change. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 1-39.
14. Barnard, P. J., Wilson, M., & MacLean, A. (1987). Approximate modelling of cognitive activity with an expert system: A strategy for the development of an interactive design tool. Proceedings of CHI+GI'87, 21-26. New York: ACM.
15. Barnard, P. J., Wilson, M., & MacLean, A. (1988). Approximate modelling of cognitive activity with an expert system: A theory based strategy for developing an interactive design tool. The Computer Journal, 31, 445-456.
16. Bellotti, V., Blandford, A., Duke, D., MacLean, A., May, J., & Nigay, L. (1996). Interpersonal access control in computer-mediated communications: A systematic analysis of the design space. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 357-432.
17. Card, S. K., & Henderson, D. A. (1987). A multiple virtual workspace interface to support user task switching. Proceedings of CHI+GI'87, 53-59. New York: ACM
18. Card, S. K., Moran T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Carroll, J. M., & Campbell, R. L. (1986). Artifacts as psychological theories: The case of human-computer interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 8, 247-256
20. Carroll, J. M., Kellog, W. A., & Rosson, M. B. (1991). The task-artifact cycle. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction (pp. 74-102). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Duke, D. J. (1995). Reasoning about gestural interaction. Computer Graphics Forum, 14, 55-66.
22. Duke, D. J., Barnard, P. J., Duce, D. A., & May, J. (1995). Systematic development of the human interface. APSEC'95: Second Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 313-321. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
23. Duke, D. J., Barnard, P. J., Duce, D. A., & May, J. (1998). Syndetic modelling. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 337-393.
24. Green, A. J. K., & Barnard, P. J. (1990). Iconic interfacing: The role of icon distinctiveness and fixed or variable screen location. Human-Computer Interaction: INTERACT'90, 457-462. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. Hammond, N., & Allinson, L. (1988). Travels around a learning support environment. Proceedings of CHI'88, 269-273. New York: ACM.
26. Jørgensen, A., & May, J. (1997). Evaluation of a theory-based display guide. Proceedings of HCI International'97, 403-406. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Kieras, D. E., Meyer, D. E., Mueller, S., & Seymour, T. (1999). Insights into working memory from the perspective of the EPIC architecture for modelling skilled perceptual-motor and cognitive human performance. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 183-223). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kieras, D. E., & Polson, P. G. (1985). An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 365-394.
29. Landauer, T. K. (1987). Relations between cognitive psychology and computer systems design. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought (pp. 1-25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Landauer, T. K. (1995). The trouble with computers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Lim, K. Y., & Long, J. B. (1994). The MUSE method for usability engineering. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Long, J. B., & Dowell, J. (1989). Conceptions of the discipline of HCI: Craft, applied science and engineering. In A. Sutcliffe & L. Macaulay (Eds.), People and computers V: Proceedings of the HCI'89 Conference (pp. 9-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lovett, M. C., Reder, L. M., & Lebiere, C. (1999). Modelling working memory in a unified architecture: An ACT-R perspective. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 135-182). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. MacLean, A., Young, R., Bellotti, V., & Moran, T. (1991). Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 201-250.
35. May, J., & Barnard, P. J. (1995a). Cinematography and interface design. Human-Computer Interaction: INTERACT'95, 26-31. London: Chapman & Hall
36. May, J., & Barnard, P. J. (1995b). Towards supportive evaluation during design. Interacting with Computers, 7, 115-143.
37. May, J., & Barnard, P. J. (1997). Modelling multimodal interaction: A theory-based technique for design analysis and support. Human-Computer Interaction: INTERACTS'97, 667-668. London: Chapman & Hall.
38. May, J., Barnard, P. J., & Blandford, A. (1993). Using structural descriptions of interfaces to automate the modelling of user cognition. User Modelling and User Adaptive Interfaces, 3, 27-64.
39. May, J., Scott, S., & Barnard, P. (1995). Structuring displays: A psychological guide (Eurographics Tutorial Notes PS95 TN4). Geneva, Switzerland: European Association for Computer Graphics.
40. May, J., Tweedie, L., & Barnard, P. (1993). Modelling user performance in visually based interactions. People and Computers VIII: Proceedings of the HCI'93 Conference, 95-110. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Newell, S., & Card, S. K. (1985). The prospects for science in human computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 209-242
42. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. London: Academic.
43. Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 31-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Payne, S., & Green, T. (1986). Task action grammars: A model of the mental representation of task languages. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 93-133.
45. Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A methodology for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, 741-773.
46. Reisner, P. (1982). Further developments towards using formal grammar as a design tool. Human Factors in Computer Systems, 304-308. New York: ACM.
47. Shum, S., & Hammond, N. (1993). Analysis of the expert system modeller as a vehicle for ICS encapsulation (AMODEUS-2 Project Document TA/WP5). Available: ftp://ftp.mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk/pub/amodeus/assay/ta_wp05.rtf
48. Teasdale, J., & Barnard, P. J. (1993). Affect, cognition and change: Re-modelling depressive thought. Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
49. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA - A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 5(1), 36-44.
50. Whiteside, J., & Wixon, D. (1987). Improving human computer interaction: A quest for cognitive science. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought (pp. 353-365). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Young, R. M., & Barnard, P. J. (1987). The use of scenarios in human computer interaction: Turbocharging the tortoise of cumulative science. Proceedings of CHI+GI'87, 291-296. New York: ACM.
52. Young, R. M., Green, T. R. G., & Simon, T. (1989). Programmable user models for predictive evaluation of interface designs. Proceedings of CHI'89, 15-19. New York: ACM.
53. Young, R. M., & Lewis, R. L. (in press). The SOAR cognitive architecture and human working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.